The uncertainty over the evidence leaves parents with many questions and pediatricians with few answers.
Not exact matches
However, one of the panel's reservations was that ``... a statistical method used in the 1999 study was not the best and that some
uncertainties in the work «have been underestimated,»...» The panel concluded «Based on the analyses presented in the original papers by Mann et al. and this newer supporting
evidence, the committee finds it plausible that the Northern Hemisphere was warmer during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period
over the preceding millennium.
Based on this, the longer term planning should probably be based (from the available
evidence) on an assumption of a measurable increase in temperature
over the next 15 - 20 years, with the
uncertainty being in the range «slight cooling» to «significant warming».
The WGI contribution to the TAR — Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis — found, «In the light of new
evidence and taking into account the remaining
uncertainties, most of the observed warming
over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.»
Another issue for scientists in evaluating the film arises because we also work in a tradition of
evidence building up
over the years to give greater and greater understanding (and generally, but not always, leading to less and less
uncertainty); for us, this process is typically continuous and cumulative.
Fundamental
uncertainties arise from insufficient observational
evidence, disagreements
over how to interpret data, and how to set the parameters of models.
Climate scientists disagree because of fundamental
uncertainties arise from insufficient observational
evidence, disagreements
over how to interpret data, and how to set the parameters of models.»
Given the
evidence base and remaining
uncertainties, confidence is very high that the global climate is projected to continue to change
over this century and beyond.
Despite dataset and modelling
uncertainty, these results, together with the understanding of the causes of observed warming
over the past century, provide substantial
evidence of a human contribution to the observed decline in Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover extent.
Despite decades of persistent
uncertainty over how sensitive the climate system is to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels, we now have new satellite
evidence which strongly suggests that the climate system is much less sensitive than is claimed by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
• Poles to tropics temperature gradient, average temp of tropics
over past 540 Ma; and arguably warming may be net - beneficial overall • Quotes from IPCC AR4 WG1 showing that warming would be beneficial for life, not damaging • Quotes from IPCC AR5 WG3 stating (in effect) that the damage functions used for estimating damages are not supported by
evidence • Richard Tol's breakdown of economic impacts of GW by sector • Economic damages of climate change — about the IAMs • McKitrick — Social Cost of Carbon much lower than commonly stated • Bias on impacts of GHG emissions — Figure 1 is a chart showing 15 recent estimates of SCC — Lewis and Curry, 2015, has the lowest
uncertainty range.
The WGI contribution to the TAR (Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis) found, «In the light of new
evidence and taking into account the remaining
uncertainties, most of the observed warming
over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.»