The ultimate undifferentiated subject of a man's experience, that is, his self, could not be other than the ultimate undifferentiated subject of any other man's experience or, indeed, Brahman itself, the one
unchanging subject of all change.
Whitehead's rejection ofthat position was emphatic: «It is fundamental to the metaphysical doctrine of the philosophy of organism that the notion of an actual entity as
the unchanging subject of change is completely abandoned» (PR 29 / 44).
Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 29) Neither is the Whiteheadian self
an unchanging subject of change.
Furthermore, the notion of the purely numerical identity of
an unchanging subject of change seems vague or even incoherent.
It is fundamental to the metaphysical doctrine of the philosophy of organism, that the notion of an actual entity as
the unchanging subject of change is completely abandoned No thinker thinks twice; and, to put the matter more generally, no subject experiences twice.
Not exact matches
A substance, according to the Cartesian tradition, is a
subject of change that is itself
unchanging except for (a) purely external
changes such as location, etc. and (b) its creation or annihilation.
Kolb's «laws» are not something frozen for all time and given to us on
unchanging slabs - they are living, growing, responsive reflections
of our society, and thereby
subject to
change.