Third, and at issue here, is the attenuation doctrine: Evidence is admissible when the connection between
unconstitutional police conduct and the evidence is remote or has been interrupted by some intervening circumstance, so that «the interest protected by the constitutional guarantee that has been violated would not be served by suppression of the evidence obtained.»
Not exact matches
They cited a two - year study
conducted by UB and Cornell Law Schools that found that Buffalo
police, especially Strike Force and Housing officers, engage in
unconstitutional and discriminatory practices.
For example, where
police use more force than necessary in
conducting a search, a court may find the
conduct of the search unreasonable and therefore
unconstitutional.