July 16, 2015 — The Globe and Mail editorial regarding the need for majority voting in
uncontested director elections and for shareholder involvement in the director nomination process endorses the positions espoused by CCGG.
July 14, 2015 — CCGG's Executive Director Stephen Erlichman was quoted in The Globe and Mail about a legal panel's recommendations to amend the Ontario Business Corporations Act to require majority voting for
uncontested director elections and to remove Canadian residency requirements for directors.
CCGG Executive Director quoted in The Globe and Mail regarding legal panel's recommendations to amend the Ontario Business Corporations Act to require majority voting for
uncontested director elections and to remove Canadian residency requirements for directors
Until now,
uncontested director elections have been considered «routine.»
True majority voting should be mandatory in
every uncontested director election at all publicly traded corporations.
The Globe and Mail editorial endorses CCGG's positions on the need for majority voting in
uncontested director elections and for shareholder involvement in the director nomination process
July 14, 2015 — CCGG's Executive Director Stephen Erlichman was quoted in The Globe and Mail about a legal panel's recommendations to amend the Ontario Business Corporations Act to require majority voting for
uncontested director elections and to remove Canadian residency requirements for directors.
Not exact matches
The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines require any
director in an
uncontested election who fails to receive over 50 % of the votes cast «for» his or her election to tender his or her resignation to the board within five days of the election.
Submission to the NYSE re: Request by the U.S. Council of Institutional Investors that NYSE adopt a majority voting listing standard in
uncontested elections of
directors
L. (Sept. 1, 2014), http://us.practicallaw.com/4-578-4485 [http://perma.cc/8XRK-A4YL](«It appears that ISS negative vote recommendations based on the perceived lack of board responsiveness to shareholder concerns (as evidenced by the failure to implement a successful shareholder proposal) was the leading factor associated with
directors who failed to receive a majority of votes cast in an
uncontested election in 2014.»)
In connection with a shareholder proposal made at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company informed its shareholders that the Board had adopted a policy providing for majority voting for the election of
directors in
uncontested elections and that the Company would take steps to implement majority voting in its Articles and bylaws.
What makes the earlier analogy confusing to me now, and possibly obsolete, is the fact that this year, the
uncontested highlight of Art Dubai, which ran through the third week of March, was actually a conversation about Documenta, which brought Catherine David, Okwui Enwezor, and Adam Szymczyk — artistic
directors of Documenta 10 (1997), Documenta 11 (2002), and Documenta 14 (forthcoming in 2017), respectively — to the stage of the Global Art Forum, the fair's annual talks program.
Submission to the NASDAQ re: Request by the U.S. Council of Institutional Investors that NASDAQ adopt a majority voting listing standard in
uncontested elections of
directors
Submission to the NYSE re: Request by the U.S. Council of Institutional Investors that NYSE adopt a majority voting listing standard in
uncontested elections of
directors