Not exact matches
«The amount of carbon released during this time was vast — more than 30 times larger than all the
fossil fuels burned to date and equivalent to all the current conventional and
unconventional fossil fuel reserves we could feasibly ever extract.»
We can not
burn all of the
fossil fuels (oil, gas, coal and
unconventional fossil fuels such as tar shale and tar sands) and release the CO2 into the air without creating a different planet.
Figure 1 helps make clear why the tar sands and other
unconventional fossil fuels ought not to be developed and
burned.
Now, I'll illustrate the emissions scenario from potential
burning of tar sands oil and other
unconventional fossil fuels (UFF) as contrasted with conventional
fossil fuels (oil, gas, and coal).
Gilles wrote: «Dangerous GW is supposed to occur above some relatively high amount of
burnt fossil fuels... this high amount is reachable only if we extract
unconventional resources, ok?»
I concluded that the world would recognize that it had to phase out coal without
burning it all, and not develop
unconventional fossil fuels such as tar sands.
It warns that the targets will remain far out of reach so long with continued exploitation of
fossil fuels, such as coal
burning for electricity and continued exploitation of
unconventional oil and gas.