Generally, the remaining
uncorrected effect from urban heat islands is now believed to be less than 0.1 C, and in some parts of the world it may be more than fully compensated for by other changes in measurement methods.4 Nevertheless, this remains an important source of uncertainty.The warming trend observed over the past century is too large to be easily dismissed as a consequence of measurement errors.
Not exact matches
Strongest regional
effects between IQ subscales and normalized path length were found for PIQ and POI scores (linear regression, r < − 0.4, p < 0.05
uncorrected, df = 18)(supplemental Fig. 5, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
No doubt the crew at wattsupwiththat think it's all due to the
uncorrected urban wet island
effect and bad siting of rain gages.
[AR4 3 ES] The error in the ISPM was apparently due to the citation of of raw T2 channel satellite trends, which are
uncorrected for the
effect of stratospheric cooling [AR4 3.4.1.2].
Based primarily upon the range of urban minus rural adjusted dataset comparisons and the degree of agreement of these products with a broad range of reanalysis products, it is unlikely that any
uncorrected urban heat - island
effects and LULC change
effects have raised the estimated centennial globally averaged LSAT trends by more than 10 % of the reported trend (high confidence, based on robust evidence and high agreement).
The
effect on global temperature (the left side of the figure; see larger GIF) was of order one - thousandth of a degree, so the corrected and
uncorrected curves are indistinguishable.
I would also observe that this data is
uncorrected for urban heat island
effects (as cities urbanize they get hotter, and
effect that is different than CO2 - cause global warming and is usually corrected for in global warming studies).
An interaction
effect of priming, attachment style and valence emerged in two clusters [p < 0.005, k > 20,
uncorrected; peak voxel coordinates: -LRB--33,51,0) and (24,63,9); peak Z scores = 3.79 and 3.40].