Sentences with phrase «under applied arts»

Architecture is filed under applied arts.

Not exact matches

Colm O'Shea «As the book states very early on, there is nothing new under the sun in the art of speculation, and everything that was said then completely applies to the markets of today.

A new kind of political - economic - moral order was rising — under the hand of Providence, he thought — and perhaps the most striking thing about this new order was that in it «men have in our time carried to the highest perfection the art of pursuing in common the object of common desires, and have applied this new technique to the greatest number of purposes.»

I am a mixed martial arts fighter and I was wondering if this could be applied to operating under stress in the cage and if so would it be useful in a 5 min with 1 min rest drill to simulate mma rounds?

Under the system that is being adopted, students are assessed in the areas of academics, social / emotional development, critical thinking / problem solving, physical education, and fine and applied arts.

Under the tutelage of the photographers and conceptual artists Bernd and Hilla Becher at the city's Staatliche Kunstakademie, this generation of photographers took the methodical, taxonomic approach of the Bechers and applied conceptual modifications, veering from the pure «straight» photography of their mentors to produce works that functioned more self - consciously as art, and ushering in a new era for photography where the medium was not simply accepted as art but embraced.

Although Kazakhstan has a rich cultural tradition in applied arts and music, fine arts were only introduced under direct Soviet rule (1936 — 91).

Under the direction of Sandberg, the Stedelijk started a department of applied art in 1945 and a department of prints and drawings in 1954.

The applicants each applied for judicial review, contending that s 64 (1A) of PACE infringed their rights to respect for their private life under Art 8 (1) b of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Both parties appealed — O2 claiming that the defence under Art 6 did not apply and that in any event the CAD only covers use of a trade mark when it is the only way to identify the competitor or its goods or services, ie that the use of the mark is indispensible.

In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».

Thus it held that the duties imposed on housing authorities under the Housing Act 1996, Part VII do not give rise to «civil» rights or obligations and so ECHR, art 6 does not apply to it.

The reasoning in respect of Art 10 (2) applied also under Art 9 (2) and therefore the appeal would be dismissed.

That could be done by giving a heightened meaning to the words grossly offensive and indecent, or by reading into s 1 a provision to the effect that the section would not apply where to create an offence would be a breach of a person's Convention rights, that was, a breach of Art 10 (1), not justified under Art 10 (2).

He applied to challenge the order on two grounds: (i) that the effect of the order was to deprive him of his liberty, in breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention); and (ii), that the secretary of state had breached his statutory duty under PTA 2005, s 8 (1) in relation to consideration of criminal prosecution.

The obligations of the UK under Art 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 (the Vienna Convention), apply equally to the foreign head of a state in his personal capacity as they apply in his public capacity.

He held that this issue had to be ``... decided as a matter of substance, not form» and that fine distinctions made in English insolvency law between the position of the company in liquidation and the liquidator should not apply to the question that arose under Art 21.

Some of the particular duties which it had been suggested would follow — a duty not to close the home without regard to the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) right to a home of publicly funded residents, and perhaps even a duty to give priority to accepting such residents into the home — fitted uneasily with the ordinary private law freedom to carry on operations under agreed contractual terms, even accepting that, if the Convention applied, a private care home would be able to invoke that freedom as a relevant factor under Art 8 (2).