In most ancient near Eastern cultures, including Israel, unmarried women were considered the property of their fathers (or the male head - of - house), and
under biblical law could either be sold into slavery to pay off debt or married for a bride price (Exodus 21:7, Nehemiah 5:5; Genesis 29:1 - 10).
With all of these discussions and opinions you shared in great detail regarding slaves bound
under biblical law, how can you say that you do not admit that the bible condones slavery?
Not exact matches
Investment for return (as Rodney Stark relates in The Victory of Reason) largely occurred against the grain of Church teaching, the Spanish Scholastics being largely ignored, and it was Calvin's application of
biblical law to trade and commerce that created the competitive tension
under which a millennium of misapplication and resultant economic suppression could begin to be corrected.
I refuse to live
under any «
biblical» magic book
law.
Yet even in the case of blood vengeance,
biblical law at least keeps the system
under the watchful eye of the elders, who arbitrate the claims of the respective parties, just as in the more direct cases of lex talionis.
That
biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions of the American idea: that government stood
under the judgment of divine and natural
law; that government was limited in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm of conscience; that national greatness was measured by fidelity to the moral truths taught by revelation and inscribed in the world by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
I am saying that whether one believes we are
under the
law or
under grace... there is still no
biblical mandate of sexual abstinence outside of marriage unless one is a woman and the property of a man whose property value goes down once she is no longer a virgin.
The
biblical interpretation stands, above all,
under the archetype of the covenant, but it is also consonant with the classical theory of natural
law as derived from ancient philosophy and handed down by the church fathers.
But according to the
biblical witness, man does not exist
under a cruel
law of self - preservation, nor is pleasure the goal of his life.
Had Mr Seay done his
Biblical homework (as well as his «flock»), he would have seen that
under the Mosaic
Law covenant, that tattoes were a violation of the
Law.
This new analogy invites us to place the originary expressions of
biblical faith
under the sign of the poetic function of language; not to deprive them of any referent, but to put them
under the
law of split reference that characterizes the poetic function.
TWU considers that sexual intimacy outside heterosexual marriage falls into this category of actions permitted
under Canadian
law but inconsistent with their
biblical view of sexuality.