Sentences with phrase «under court order since»

Deltona Animal Control Manager Jerry Swanger said the pair killed five cats in their owner's neighborhood and had been held under court order since Oct. 13.

Not exact matches

Under orders of India's Supreme Court, officials since last week have been auditing precious royal offerings kept in underground vaults of the famed Sree Padmnabha Swamy temple in the coastal state of Kerala.

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

«However, since the federal government continues to proclaim loudly that it operates under the rule of law it can not be operated to treat court orders with disdain.

The market, which has been under reconstruction since December 2014 after a court in Cape Coast ordered the demolition of the old one, was initially scheduled for completion next month.

Connecticut is an important exception to this trend, but that is because since 1996, the entire state has been under a state supreme court order to desegregate.

And the district had been operating under state control since 1995 and receiving court - ordered state aid that pushed its per student spending to beyond $ 20,000 a year.

Finding that, the Court went on to conclude that the provincial deemed trust under the PBA applies in CCAA proceedings, subject to the doctrine of federal paramountcy, because of the Amended Initial Order, and noting that that means that when there is a CCAA liquidation proceeding, the PPSA may determine the priorities rather than the federal scheme under the BIA (Indalex, para 52), since analogous priorities are not set out in the CCAA.

It has since engaged in bilateral discussions, as talks with the Commission are currently banned by order of its President, Jean - Claude Juncker, a measure we are also challenging under Article 263 TEU in the General Court in Luxembourg.

With 2,371 secret surveillance orders approved in 2007, federal surveillance activity under the jurisdiction of the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has risen for the 9th year in a row — more than doubling since 2000.

And here, since it appears from the statement in the order of the Court of Appeal that the question whether the Syndicalism Act and its application in this case was repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment was considered and passed upon by that court — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of eCourt of Appeal that the question whether the Syndicalism Act and its application in this case was repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment was considered and passed upon by that court — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of ecourt — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of eCourt has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of error.

The judge took the view that there was nothing objectionable in the granting of the ex parte order for recognition of the Award since this is the procedure provided in Part 43 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts and there is authority in both England and Australia that this is justifiable where the debtor under the Award is a state.

As applied to the stage reached here in the DIFC, the agreement to arbitrate is sufficient waiver to the orders for recognition under Article 42 of the Arbitration Law which are contained in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Court's order of 29 May 2017, and (though less clearly) the orders for enforcement as a judgment under Article 43 as contained in paragraphs 3 and 4, since they do not deal with execution and actual enforcement on assets.

However, the situation under the provincial Family Law Act was different: the Ontario court could still rule on questions relating to child support, since the foreign court in China had not already done so in its divorce order.

After pointing out that the husband would have an easier time satisfying his hefty support arrears without a bankruptcy trustee in the way — and after taking pains to clarify that such a discharge would have no effect on the wife's support entitlement (since by law a discharge does not release a person from child / spousal support or maintenance obligation arising under a court order), the court ordered him to pay $ 25,000 to the trustee immediately.

131 (1) Upon application by the corporation, a lessor of a leasehold condominium corporation, an owner or a mortgagee of a unit, the Superior Court of Justice may make an order appointing an administrator for a corporation under this Act if at least 120 days have passed since a turn - over meeting has been held under section 43.

The Court also declined to exercise its discretion to quash the order on the ground that the section of the Income Tax Act under which the order was made, has since been amended to eliminate the court's ability to grant such orders on an ex parte bCourt also declined to exercise its discretion to quash the order on the ground that the section of the Income Tax Act under which the order was made, has since been amended to eliminate the court's ability to grant such orders on an ex parte bcourt's ability to grant such orders on an ex parte basis.

Pursuant to s 47 (7): «the court can not give leave under subsection... (5) unless satisfied that there has been a change in circumstances since the placement order was made».

Either parent can apply to vary (change) a child support order made under the Family Law Act provided 6 months have elapsed since the order was made or the court last dealt with an application to vary.

Under the law, the court will change a custody order only if circumstances have changed since the time the original order was in place and if it is in the best interest of the child to modify the custody arrangement.

Under Michigan law, courts will not consider modification of child support obligations unless there has been a significant change in circumstances since the last order was established.

Under state law, unless the parent can prove a «substantial change in circumstances,» a parent can not request a modification unless at least two - and - a-half years have passed since the court issued the existing order.

(6A) Where, as provided by subsection (6), an order decreasing the amount of a periodic sum payable under an order is expressed to be retrospective to a specified date, any moneys paid under the second ‑ mentioned order since the specified date, being moneys that would not have been required to be paid under the second ‑ mentioned order as varied by the first ‑ mentioned order, may be recovered in a court having jurisdiction under this Act.

(6B) Where, as provided by subsection (6), an order discharging an order is expressed to be retrospective to a specified date, any moneys paid under the second ‑ mentioned order since the specified date may be recovered in a court having jurisdiction under this Act.