Sentences with phrase «under federal court order»

Last year, Indianapolis - based Simon Property Group, which owned the mall with the Ghermezians and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association, was forced to sell the Ghermezians its 27.5 % stake in the property under a federal court order.

As a result, in 1992, the Canadian Armed Forces, under Federal Court Order, discarded all discriminatory and restrictive policies regarding the service of gay military personnel;

March 28, 2018 • Orange County, Calif., is under federal court order to deal with a worsening homelessness crisis.

As Ivey will tell you, she had about three hours to prepare before taking over the governorship, coming into office at the height of a controversy that forced out her predecessor and inheriting a prison system under federal court order.

Even before the storm, the power authority had been operating under a federal court order for Clean Air Act violations and was reported to have cheated its ratepayers for many years.

The county is under a federal court order to clean up the lake.

Not exact matches

The documents indicate that under the program, launched in 2001, a federal judge sitting on the secret surveillance panel called the Fisa court would approve a bulk collection order for internet metadata «every 90 days».

Those orders, now or soon to be under review in three separate federal appeals courts, declared that President Trump and his aides very likely violated federal law in acting to shut down DACA.

55 (1) Judicial review by the Federal Court of Appeal with respect to any order made under subsection 54 (1) is commenced by making an application for leave to the Court.

The government says over time some actions have been taken by the communities under state pressure to end the discrimination but that federal authorities are seeking a court order to prevent future discrimination by the defendants.

Christians fleeing the Middle East will not take first priority under an updated version of President Donald Trump's executive order on travel and refugees, which he signed Monday morning after weeks of debate and holdups in federal court.

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

Nigerian government now seeks a court order compelling the two companies to pay into the Federal government of Nigeria account with the Central Bank of Nigeria, the sum of USD 406,751,070 being the total value of the missing revenue from the shortfall / undeclared / under - declared crude oil shipments of the country, made by the companies to United States of America.

The election tribunals and Court of Appeal ordered the re-runs, after voiding the returns for most of the Rivers legislative seats, federal and state; before the Supreme Court, in a bizarre verdict, endorsed the governorship poll, held the same day, and under the same bloody conditions, as the state legislative elections.

She's not acting on behalf of the Supreme Court; she is acting under her own (pretty vast) authority as a federal judge under Article III of the Constitution, and issuing the order from a district cCourt; she is acting under her own (pretty vast) authority as a federal judge under Article III of the Constitution, and issuing the order from a district courtcourt.

«However, since the federal government continues to proclaim loudly that it operates under the rule of law it can not be operated to treat court orders with disdain.

He was sentenced to two years in prison and ordered to pay $ 280,000 in restitution, but the penalty was stayed pending a much - anticipated US Supreme Court decision involving the «honest services» section of the federal mail - fraud law under which he was tried.

; Patrick Akpolobolokemi, the former NIMASA Director - General was rough - handled and bundled into a van right in front of the court premises where a judge had just granted him bail; several persons are known to have been detained for periods far in excess of the constitutionally mandated 48 hours initially under spurious detention orders signed by magistrates courts in the Federal Capital Territtory!

But in her motion challenging the EFCC's ex parte application, Mrs. Jonathan, through her lawyers, argued that the EFCC's «Ex parte Originating Summons» was not one of the modes of commencement of action under Order 3, Rule 1 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or rules of cCourt (Civil Procedure Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or rules of courtcourt.

Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court also in Abuja had granted the ex-NSA bail on November 3 in the charges of unlawful possession of firearms but the bail was on November 4 scuttled by the SSS who instead of obeying court order laid siege on his Asokoro Residence and placed him under house arCourt also in Abuja had granted the ex-NSA bail on November 3 in the charges of unlawful possession of firearms but the bail was on November 4 scuttled by the SSS who instead of obeying court order laid siege on his Asokoro Residence and placed him under house arcourt order laid siege on his Asokoro Residence and placed him under house arrest.

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered that a former Peoples Democratic Party, PDP National Chairman, Haliru Bello Mohammed be placed under the watch of...

Courts in Rhode Island rarely require abusers to turn in their firearms, even when orders prohibit them from possessing firearms under federal law and there is evidence they pose a lethal risk to victims, according to research presented today at the American Public Health Association's 2016 Annual Meeting and Expo in Denver.

U.S. District Judge George W. White ruled last month that a federal court order that placed the district under state control will be lifted on Sept. 9.

In 2001 only the federal appeals court covering the states of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont had upheld the use of race in student assignment or magnet school admissions in school districts not already under court order; it did so on the grounds that the state had a compelling interest in racial diversity.

Resurrecting long - ignored school desegregation lawsuits of the 1970s, the DOJ petitioned a federal district court to permanently enjoin Louisiana from awarding any vouchers to students in districts operating under federal desegregation orders until the state had received authorization from a federal court.

Structured settlements are governed by both federal and state laws and must be closed under court order.

then you are entitled to bring an application before a court seeking a «court - ordered discharge» pursuant to a «hardship provision» under federal bankruptcy law

If you file for personal bankruptcy more than five years after the date of the «end of your education» then you are entitled to bring an application before a court seeking a «court - ordered discharge» pursuant to a «hardship provision» under federal bankruptcy law

A federal court in Washington, D.C. has ordered that financial and other data submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the federal Animal Welfare Act must be released to The Humane Society of the United States under the Freedom of Information Act.

Back on July 7, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected FERC's order revising PJM Interconnection's «Minimum Offer Price Rule» (MOPR), saying FERC exceeded its Section 205 authority under the Federal Power Act by commanding an entirely different approach to the MOPR than what PJM's stakeholders agreed upon...

«We are pleased the court ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restore DACA under the same conditions set forth by a federal court in California,» said New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the plaintiffs, in a statement.

However, a court may reduce (modify) to include any of the requirements relating to probation and community control, a legal sentence imposed by it within 60 days of its imposition; after the receipt by the court of a mandate issued by the appellate court upon affirmance of the judgment and / or sentence upon an original appeal; after receipt by the court of a certified copy of an order of the appellate court dismissing an original appeal from the judgment and / or sentence; or if further appellate review is sought in a higher court or in successively higher courts, after the highest state or federal court to which a timely appeal has been taken under authority of law, or when a petition for certiorari has been timely filed under authority of law, has written an order of affirmance or an order dismissing the appeal and / or denying certiorari.

The promise doctrine was developed through the Federal Courts» jurisprudence; under it, a judge reviewed a patent as a whole to identify any «promises» made in it, then assessed whether those promises had been met in order to satisfy the utility requirement of the patent under the Patent Act.

The Federal Court says it has no jurisdiction under PIPEDA to order the correction of a record of personal information.

Finding that, the Court went on to conclude that the provincial deemed trust under the PBA applies in CCAA proceedings, subject to the doctrine of federal paramountcy, because of the Amended Initial Order, and noting that that means that when there is a CCAA liquidation proceeding, the PPSA may determine the priorities rather than the federal scheme under the BIA (Indalex, para 52), since analogous priorities are not set out in the CCAA.

we noted one of the signs of the coming Legal Profession Apocalypse, namely that a California federal court judge, without any provocation or precipitating incident whatsoever, ordered opposing counsels in a trial to preemptively draw up a «civility code» under which they would conduct themselves.

With 2,371 secret surveillance orders approved in 2007, federal surveillance activity under the jurisdiction of the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has risen for the 9th year in a row — more than doubling since 2000.

The TransCanada decision came only a few days after the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal ordering the federal government to renegotiate the terms under which the Trans Mountain pipeline crosses a First Nations reserve in British Columbia, raising new questions about the fate of Kinder Morgan Inc.'s federally approved plan to expand the piFederal Court of Appeal ordering the federal government to renegotiate the terms under which the Trans Mountain pipeline crosses a First Nations reserve in British Columbia, raising new questions about the fate of Kinder Morgan Inc.'s federally approved plan to expand the pifederal government to renegotiate the terms under which the Trans Mountain pipeline crosses a First Nations reserve in British Columbia, raising new questions about the fate of Kinder Morgan Inc.'s federally approved plan to expand the pipeline.

Under the Alberta Business Corporations Act (or the federal one or any other provincial corporations act for that matter), any of these forms of «oppression» may be remedied by an order of the Court, which has a range of discretion under the legislaUnder the Alberta Business Corporations Act (or the federal one or any other provincial corporations act for that matter), any of these forms of «oppression» may be remedied by an order of the Court, which has a range of discretion under the legislaunder the legislation.

In order to secure a conviction in federal court under that statute, federal prosecutors must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused did knowingly associate with a criminal venture and intended on the venture being a success.

[1] Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta, the Minister of Justice and Solicitor General of Alberta and the Deputy Minister of Justice of Alberta (hereinafter referred to as the Alberta Crown) seek an order to strike the Second Amended Statement of Claim under Rule 221 (1) of the Federal Courts Rules

And here, since it appears from the statement in the order of the Court of Appeal that the question whether the Syndicalism Act and its application in this case was repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment was considered and passed upon by that court — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of eCourt of Appeal that the question whether the Syndicalism Act and its application in this case was repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment was considered and passed upon by that court — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of ecourt — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of eCourt has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of error.

The government had brought an application for an order under the All Writs Act 28 USC s 1651 directing Apple, Inc. («Apple») to assist in the execution of a federal search warrant by defeating the security of an iPhone that was seized in a drug investigation pursuant to a warrant issued by the court.

The government had brought an application for an order under the All Writs Act 28 USC s. 1651 directing Apple, Inc. («Apple») to assist in the execution of a federal search warrant by disabling the security of an iPhone that had been seized pursuant to a warrant issued by the court.

The Court specifically found that agents of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service — on the advice of and with the concurrence of their Department of Justice lawyers — misled the Federal Court of Canada in order to obtain a warrant or warrants under the CSIS Act.

In late January, she petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court again, asking for leniency with respect to the deadline for e-filing integration, and explicitly seeking permission to comply with the federal court order by making e-filed documents (including documents filed under seal) immediately available to the puCourt again, asking for leniency with respect to the deadline for e-filing integration, and explicitly seeking permission to comply with the federal court order by making e-filed documents (including documents filed under seal) immediately available to the pucourt order by making e-filed documents (including documents filed under seal) immediately available to the public.

In making an order for custody or access under either the Divorce Act (federal legislation, for married parents pursuing a divorce) or the Children's Law Reform Act (Ontario legislation applying to parents who are not married, or who are not pursuing a divorce), the court will consider only the best interests of the child.

The Supreme Court found that the pith and substance of the Guidelines Order was to require the decision - maker to gather information about environmental impacts within all the heads of power under Federal jurisdiction before making that decision about navigation.

The franchisor, 10313033 Canada Inc., purchased the assets of a previous franchisor under an order issued by the Quebec Superior Court authorizing the purchase under the federal Companies» Creditors Arrangement Act.

Until January 1, 2015 under the old copyright border regime, a copyright owner could only get Canadian Customs officers at the border to detain suspected infringing copies of works if the copyright owner or exclusive licensee had a court order from the Federal Court of Canada or from a superior court of law in one of the provicourt order from the Federal Court of Canada or from a superior court of law in one of the proviCourt of Canada or from a superior court of law in one of the provicourt of law in one of the provinces.