Sentences with phrase «under federal poverty»

Eligibility overview: While Wisconsin did not expand Medicaid under Obamacare, the state covers everyone under the federal poverty line under the state's BadgerCare program.

For example, almost 47 million Americans live under the federal poverty line, and the same number have average household credit card debt of $ 16,000.

Based on a report released in April, the New York State Office of Indigent Defense is recommending all counties outside of New York City increase indigent defense eligibility under the federal poverty level guidelines, which could increase the number of cases county indigent defense offices are required to handle.

KIPP alumni are predominantly low - income students of color, the network says: 95 percent are African - American or Latino and nearly 90 percent qualify for free or reduced - price lunch under federal poverty guidelines.

A majority of my students fall under the federal poverty line and most of them share the same education experiences...

In this year as well as last, per capita sales were highest in counties with high poverty rates, where 20 percent or more of the population lives under the federal poverty line.

Not exact matches

So far, 31 states and the District of Columbia have expanded their Medicaid programs under the ACA to cover adults who earn up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level — or $ 16,394 per year.

Posted by Nick Falvo under aboriginal peoples, Balanced budgets, child benefits, Child Care, corporate income tax, CPP, debt, deficits, early learning, economic thought, federal budget, fiscal federalism, fiscal policy, homeless, housing, income distribution, income support, income tax, Indigenous people, inequality, labour market, macroeconomics, OECD, Old Age Security, poverty, privatization, public infrastructure, public services, Role of government, social policy, taxation, women.

Posted by Nick Falvo under Alberta, budgets, carbon pricing, child benefits, climate change, corporate income tax, debt, demographics, energy, environment, federal budget, health care, homeless, housing, HST, income support, income tax, inflation, population aging, poverty, public services, seniors, social policy, taxation.

Posted by Nick Falvo under aboriginal peoples, Alberta, Conservative government, federal budget, fiscal federalism, homeless, housing, Indigenous people, poverty, Role of government, social policy.

Under Obamacare, people who earn too much for Medicaid but are still low - income — up to 250 percent of the federal poverty line, about $ 30,000 for one person — receive cost - sharing reductions for their private insurance.

An Urban Institute study from that year estimated that one in six nonelderly (under age 65) Americans lives in a family in which adults work at least half - time but family income falls below twice the federal poverty level.

In doing some quick googling, it appears that anyone under 133 % of the poverty line threshold qualifies for federal medicaid.

The ACA requires health plans to offer reduced copayments and deductibles for customers under 250 percent of the federal poverty level, and CSR subsidies compensate them for the cost of those discounts.

-- The budget approves the creation of a Basic Health Program, an insurance program available under the Affordable Care Act that provides insurance for people whose incomes are between 138 and 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

Under this federal law, a family of four, earning up to $ 32,319 is eligible for Medicaid assistance, Poloncarz said, making it available to lower - income working families living above the federal poverty level.

SYEP was administered through Buffalo Urban League and provided services for 724 participating youths across Erie County, 563 of whom were categorized as having family incomes under 125 percent of the Federal Poverty Level.

By 2003, when the national child poverty rate had fallen to 17.6 percent, approximately 54 percent of children of immigrants lived in families with incomes under twice the federal poverty level, compared to 36 percent of children of native - born parents.

However, Welner expressed skepticism about the organization that issued the study showing that two - thirds of scholarship recipients in Arizona fall under 185 % of the federal poverty line.

To qualify for the Opportunity Scholarship Program, students must either receive benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or have a family earning no more than 185 percent of the federal poverty level when they enter the program ($ 43,568 for a family of four in 2013 — 2014).

For reference, students on Free and Reduced Lunch are at or under 185 % of the Federal Poverty Level.

In 2002 - 03, schools that received federal poverty money came under the No Child umbrella.

Under their plan, families at 220 percent of the federal poverty level would qualify — including far more students than those in poverty.

Under the voucher program headed to Walker's desk, students whose families earn less than 185 percent of the federal poverty level will be able to sign up between Aug. 1 - 9 with private schools that choose to participate.

Statewide Voucher Program — Income Eligibility Limit: Increase the annual family income eligibility level, beginning in the 2018 - 19 school year, so that a pupil could participate in the statewide voucher program with a family income of less than 220 percent of the federal poverty level rather than less than 185 percent of FPL as under current law.

* Assure a stronger focus on equity by (a) asking states not just about the amount of funding in education, but also about the fairness of its distribution to high - and low - poverty and high - and low - minority districts and schools, and (b) asking states to document their efforts (required under federal law) to address gaps in teacher quality between high - and low - poverty and high - and low - minority schools.

Under this plan, «low - income families» — households with incomes less than 300 % of the federal poverty line could enroll their students in a private school.

A teacher who supports students in poverty under federal Title I grants might be adept at improving reading fluency, for example; she may lead a small group including English - learners, general education students, and a student with dyslexia who all need to work on that skill.

Using data from the 2012 - 2013 school year, the study determined that 51 percent of all students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade were eligible under the federal program for free and reduced - price lunch, a standard measure of the number of children living in poverty.

As of 2011, 118,809 Connecticut children, under the age of 18, lived in households with incomes below the Federal Poverty Level.

In total, 44 percent of the people who made payments to these collectors earn under 250 percent of the federal poverty level or less than $ 30,000 per year for an individual.

You've got a partial financial hardship id your annual federal student loan payments calculated under a ten - year standard repayment plan are greater than 15 % of the difference between your adjusted gross income (and that of a spouse, if you're married and file taxes jointly) and 150 % of the poverty guideline for your family size and state.

The poverty guidelines may be formally referenced as «the poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 9902 (2).»

With the federal government under pressure to reform Canada's pension system so that retiring baby boomers and future generations don't fall into poverty, the paper by the think - tank's chief economist William Robson and Alexandre Laurin offers one way to ease the challenge facing seniors at little cost to Ottawa.

They are still mandated by federal law for those with incomes under 250 % of poverty level (and the gold plating gets thicker as your income drops!).

While federal grants through LSC subsidiaries, such as the Northwest Justice Project, exist to help Americans in need, the income threshold of 125 % of the federal poverty line ($ 14,850 per year for an individual and under $ 30,375 for a family of four) means that many earn too much to qualify for help, yet too little to afford a lawyer.

Under the income - driven plans, monthly payments are determined based on adjusted gross income (AGI) as reported on your federal tax return and the federal poverty rate that corresponds to your family size.

A. Under the rules, «the poor» are not only those living below the federal poverty guidelines (a sliding income scale based on family size), but also the «working poor».

Under McDuffie's plan, the D.C. Bar Foundation would administer grants for lawyers to represent tenants with incomes at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty line.

If you're under age 65 and make less than 133 % of the Federal Poverty Level, you may be eligible for help.

In states that opted for Medicaid expansion, as permitted under former President Barack Obama's health care law, single adults making less than 133 % of the Federal Poverty Level can also get coverage.

Under the health care law, people who earn between 100 % and 400 % of the federal poverty level are eligible for a premium tax credit when they purchase a plan through the exchange.

Under the ACA, people who earn between 100 % and 400 % of the federal poverty level and purchase a plan through the exchange qualify for premium subsidies that offset their monthly insurance payments.

«Let's test the marketplace and see if it moves the needle» on lowering costs to about $ 50 per month and insuring more low - income drivers under 133 percent of the federal poverty level.

There are 966,400 families with children under age six who are not yet in kindergarten who could potentially benefit from home visiting — 28 % of these families have incomes below the federal poverty level.

The reasoning behind this proposition is that: A) EBHV programs are designed to serve women categorized as «at - risk» due to a variety of demographic factors, including single - parent household status, age at time of first pregnancy, being categorically undereducated, under or unemployed, and meeting federal standards of living at or below the poverty line; B) these programs serve women during pregnancy and / or shortly after the birth of their children, offering an excellent chance for the early prevention of trauma exposure; and C) intervention services are provided at the same times that attachment (whether secure or insecure) is being developed between mothers and children, providing the opportunity that generational risk may be mitigated.

The legislature in Washington directed the state to raise eligibility under the program from 200 % to 250 % of the federal poverty level, reversing an earlier attempt by the state agency, as part of a larger effort to cut state expenditures, to discontinue its existing Medicaid family planning expansion.

From that group, a little more than half fall under the category of «extreme poverty,» or 50 percent below the federal poverty level.

This equated to 44,923 of Rhode Island's 208,700 children under the age of 18 living below the federal poverty threshold, which was an income of $ 18,769 for a family of three with two children, and $ 23,624 for a family of four with two children in 2013.

Note: 2,552,000 children under three in the U.S. live below the federal poverty level.