Kremer and his colleagues then wanted to determine what would happen to phytoplankton distributions
under future warming scenarios.
Not exact matches
They then compared how 10 different vegetation classes, ranging from grasses to trees, would likely respond in the Arctic
under these different
future warming scenarios.
As can be seen your graph, our climate models make a wide range of predictions (perhaps 0.5 - 5 degC, a 10-fold uncertainty) about how much «committed
warming» will occur in the
future under any stabilization
scenario, so we don't seem to have a decent understanding of these processes.
Accurate answers to this question are subject to data constraints, as neither of the available projection datasets
under future climate change
scenarios is designed for a 1.5 / 2 °C temperature
warming levels.
[*) That's a really rapid
warming under both
scenarios, considering the baseline (1961 — 1990, so not «preindustrial») and the used definition of
future climate (2070 - 2100)-RSB-.
Coastal state and US total 2010 census populations living on land falling below
future committed high tide lines
under different fixed long - term
warming scenarios, assuming the inevitable collapse of the WAIS
under any
scenario (triggered case)
Coastal state and US total 2010 census populations living on land falling below
future committed high tide lines
under different fixed long - term
warming scenarios, making no assumptions about the inevitability of WAIS collapse (baseline case)
The authors also published their own response with Carbon Brief, pointing out that they «present no evidence in our paper to suggest that
future CO2 - induced
warming under any emissions
scenario will be lower than the projections given in AR5 [the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's fifth assessment report]».
His new research, published in Earth's
Future, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, presents a global assessment of the economic costs and the population affected by river floods
under different global
warming scenarios.
We estimate that anthropogenic influence has caused a more than 60-fold increase in the likelihood of the extreme
warm 2013 summer since the early 1950s, and project that similarly hot summers will become even more frequent in the
future, with fully 50 % of summers being hotter than the 2013 summer in two decades even
under the moderate RCP4.5 emissions
scenario.
The results can give us projections of
future global
warming under a variety of
scenarios, and also give us an estimate of the global climate sensitivity.
In their study, Dim Coumou, from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, and Alexander Robinson, from Universidad Complutense de Madrid, used state - of - the - art climate models to project changes in the trend of heat extremes
under two
future warming scenarios — RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 — throughout the 21st century.
MIS 11 also appears to have been possibly the
warmest and longest interglacial of the past 5 million years and had an extended period with little or no continental ice, which is projected to occur
under some
future global
warming scenarios.
Forecasts of
future ice sheet behavior appear even more uncertain:
Under the same high — global
warming scenario, eight ice sheet models predicted anywhere between 0 and 27 cm of sea level rise in 2100 from Greenland melt.