If Rudd won't budge from 5 % domestic cuts by 2020 via carbon imposts we could still get that easily by say a 20 % MRET
under a no growth scenario.
Under the growth scenario, Prop. 98 funding would rise through 2021 - 22 by $ 12 billion, to $ 87.5 billon, a healthy increase of 16 percent over four years.
Not exact matches
I have gone into this
scenario into some detail because I think it is extremely unlikely that China can maintain current
growth rates except
under very implausible assumptions.
This
under appreciated industrials company is benefiting from internal profitability initiatives and external
growth drivers, while low profit expectations embedded in the stock price make for an attractive risk / reward
scenario.
Under this scenario, growth drops steadily during the economic adjustment period, but in an orderly way for over a decade or more as Beijing slowly gets credit growth under con
Under this
scenario,
growth drops steadily during the economic adjustment period, but in an orderly way for over a decade or more as Beijing slowly gets credit
growth under con
under control.
This is the same criticism made in Stephen Gordon's comments about attributing all job
growth over the past eight years to the Conservative government: Much of this
growth would have happened
under most alternative policy
scenarios.
Under that
scenario, Social Security, health care, and interest will be responsible for 77 percent of nominal spending
growth.
As I have argued before, except
under implausible
scenarios (at least 2 - 4 % of GDP transferred every year from the state to households) I can not work out arithmetically any meaningful rebalancing process that is consistent with average GDP
growth much above 3 - 4 % during President Xi's 2013 - 23 term in office.
A separate discussion paper published by central bank staffers in October 2017 concluded that even
under an alternative
scenario in which the potential level of
growth was ultimately 1 per cent higher than forecast by 2020, the effects on inflation would be «small» and «therefore does not affect the stance of monetary policy.»
Under this
scenario, an eventual rise in wage
growth would likely be accompanied by a secular rise in realized inflation (inflation expectations would trend with energy prices), and the policy battle onward may resemble that of Paul Volcker instead of Ben Bernanke.
To be sure, correlations can change quickly — especially
under a
scenario of a downward jolt to
growth expectations.
«We see the market for natural flake graphite hitting more than 900,000 tonnes by 2020, so
under almost any
scenario we are positive about that demand profile
growth,» he said.
Figure 5 shows R&D spending
growth under a few additional paths (along with the 2.5 percent annual R&D
growth suggested by the alternate CBO
scenario).
Under the limited
scenario, «the difference in demand
growth is substantial, profound.»
Using results from simulations conducted using an ensemble of sophisticated models, Ricke, Caldeira, and their co-authors calculated ocean chemical conditions that would occur
under different future
scenarios and determined whether these chemical conditions could sustain coral reef
growth.
To get a sense for how this probability, or risk of such a storm, will change in the future, he performed the same analysis, this time embedding the hurricane model within six global climate models, and running each model from the years 2081 to 2100,
under a future
scenario in which the world's climate changes as a result of unmitigated
growth of greenhouse gas emissions.
In turn, the ministry, taking a holistic view of the dismal
scenario in Pakistan, has launched a vast number of projects that fall
under other ministries but that involve the effective use of science and technology for economic
growth.
«The fact that 17 out of the 40 SREES
scenarios explore alternative technological development pathways
under a high
growth...
scenario family A1 does not constitute a statement that such scenaarios should be considered as more likely than others..., nor that a similar large number of technological bifurcation
scenarios would not be possible in any of the other three
scenario families» (Nakicenovic et al, 2003, «IPCC SRES Revisited: A Response», Energy & Environment, 14, 2 & 3, 2003: 195).
While the higher levels of acidity predicted
under future climate
scenarios decreased their overall
growth, this was counteracted by Read more about Sea urchins in a climate conundrum - Scimex
In our context of root
growth, the Timer model could drive similar outcomes as the Sizer model only
under very restrictive conditions of small variability in the threshold time and the cell elongation rate, suggesting it is a less plausible
scenario.
The results of such calculations, using standard economic assumptions and actuarial survivor probabilities, are shown in Figure 1, where we plot the
growth of pension wealth over the career cycle for a typical educator in Missouri
under three different promotion
scenarios, in 2012 dollars.
Under the same
scenario, a $ 10,000 investment in the Monetta Fund, a large - company
growth fund with a 1.46 % expense ratio, would grow to just $ 35,000 over two decades.
The yields on mortgage REITs are attractive — MORT yields just
under 10 % — but it is not realistic to expect much in the way of dividend
growth going forward, and dividend shrinkage might actually be the more likely
scenario.
Note that with a 2 % initial yield, you can not get to 10 by 10
under any reasonable dividend
growth scenario.
The real - dividend - per - share
growth difference was a whopping 9.3 % lower (i.e., 6.3 %
under the positive / positive
scenario and the negative 3.0 %
under the positive / negative
scenario) than its average in the more usual case of both prior market return and subsequent dividend
growth being positive.
«The fact that 17 out of the 40 SREES
scenarios explore alternative technological development pathways
under a high
growth...
scenario family A1 does not constitute a statement that such scenaarios should be considered as more likely than others..., nor that a similar large number of technological bifurcation
scenarios would not be possible in any of the other three
scenario families» (Nakicenovic et al, 2003, «IPCC SRES Revisited: A Response», Energy & Environment, 14, 2 & 3, 2003: 195).
In a section of the paper citing analysis in «The World Food Economy,» a book he co-authored in 2007, Southgate concludes that a low
growth scenario for population, leading to just
under 8 billion people by 2050, could see a 26 - percent drop in food prices even with substantial rise in consumption.
Forecasting the expected permafrost thaw, the authors found that even
under the most extreme climatic
scenario tested this thawed soil
growth will not exceed 10 meters by 2100 or 50 meters by the turn of the next millennium.
The latest relevant ABARE publication («Economic impact of climate change policy», ABARE Research Report 06 - 7) says that global CO2 emissions in its reference case closely follow those
under the IPCC's A2
scenario to 2030 and that the latter
scenario assumes a decline in economic
growth after that year (pps.
In practice the
growth in emissions is likely to be considerably less than this, because the IEA Reference
Scenario does not take account of new policies that are
under consideration in many countries.
60 TW (thermal) was seen as a likely requirement by 2100,
under the high
growth IIASA
scenarios.
The missing variable fallacy of neglecting a factor entirely, implicitly treating it as 0 % effect, minimizing mention to quickly skip on (except when the target audience unavoidably already has heard of it), is common when something is so extraordinarily dangerous to the CAGW movement as to be he - who - must - not - be-named to them, a distinction which belongs to the magnitude of beneficial effects of CO2 (several tens of percent rise in plant
growth rates
under a more extreme
scenario of CO2 doubling, plus as huge a rise in water usage efficiency, if the plants aren't underfertilized meanwhile) and to the dominating influence of cosmic rays on climate as in the link in my name.
This is based on assumed annual demand
growth of 6.34 %; further
scenarios with higher
growth rates and low addition of renewables capacity do require new coal stations, but still only at most half of those
under construction.
In the United States, oil and natural gas will supply 68 percent of energy needs by 2040, even
under the most optimistic
scenarios for renewable energy
growth.
Ellie Johnston: «
Under a
scenario where emissions continue at the current pace, most of the pollution
growth comes from the anticipated increase in fossil fuel use by developing nations.»
GAS — In a 2C world gas
growth will be «at a lower level than expected
under a business as usual
scenario», the report finds.
«Even
under best - case
scenario conditions,» Hickel argued, «absolute decoupling of GDP
growth from material use is not possible on a global scale,» and certainly is not enough to reduce material use sufficiently to stay within planetary boundaries.
A report from the World Resource Institute, published earlier this year, put the total climate finance from developed nations and international institutions at $ 42 billion in 2012 and projected that it could reach $ 77 billion by 2020
under a medium -
growth scenario.
Imagine what the percentage would be
under a
scenario of reduced demand
growth!
The exposed population could grow by 3 million between 2000 and 2030 and an additional 1.2 million by 2060 to reach 32.4 million
under scenario D. Scenario D proved to be the highest - end - of - growth scenario for «richer economies», which is due to the underlying assumptions made in the scenarios (see T
scenario D.
Scenario D proved to be the highest - end - of - growth scenario for «richer economies», which is due to the underlying assumptions made in the scenarios (see T
Scenario D proved to be the highest - end - of -
growth scenario for «richer economies», which is due to the underlying assumptions made in the scenarios (see T
scenario for «richer economies», which is due to the underlying assumptions made in the
scenarios (see Table 1).
By 2060, the LECZ population is likely to approach 1.4 billion people (534 people / km2)
under the highest - end
growth assumption, which would be 12 % of the world's population of 11.3 billion (
scenario C).
Here we use climate projections
under alternative mitigation
scenarios to show how changes in environmental variables that limit plant
growth could impact ecosystems and people.
The least squares regression approach probably
under - estimates that A
scenario growth rate, but that is OK, that just makes the conclusion more robust.
My reference to hubris was made simply to bring
under your attention that horror
scenario's expect mankind to continue
growth at the same rate as ever: Assumptions like that used to be considered pipe dreams.
We then used daily climate projections (from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 [CMIP5]-RRB-
under strong (i.e., representative concentration pathway [RCP] 2.6), moderate (i.e., RCP 4.5), and business - as - usual (i.e., RCP 8.5) mitigation
scenarios to quantify the number of days in a given year that fall within climate thresholds for plant
growth.
In the graph below, the black line shows the increase in plant
growth the IPCC models project
under a high - emissions
scenario.
Change in net primary productivity (plant
growth) projections from CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) models,
under a high emissions
scenario (RCP8.5).
Under low -
growth scenarios (A2 and B2), world GDP would double by 2020 and increase more than 10-fold by 2100.
First, you need to ask about the fees / charges / penalties related to the policy,
under what conditions you may cash out, the worst - case
scenario of your investment's
growth, and how soon you will qualify to receive a return.