Sentences with phrase «under judicial conduct»

Not exact matches

Under the bill CCTV cameras will fall under a statutory code of conduct, with citizens able to apply for a judicial review if they believe they are being used inappropriaUnder the bill CCTV cameras will fall under a statutory code of conduct, with citizens able to apply for a judicial review if they believe they are being used inappropriaunder a statutory code of conduct, with citizens able to apply for a judicial review if they believe they are being used inappropriately.

In terms of procedural fairness, the conduct of the Tribunal «must be sufficiently serious to offend our most basic notions of morality and justice» and judicial intervention is only warranted when «the Tribunal's conduct is so serious that it can not be condoned under the law of the enforcing State» (para 65).

A spokesman for the Judicial Communications Office confirms that following the investigation under the Judicial Discipline Regulations 2006, the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice had concluded that the judge's conduct amounted to misconduct.

The Ontario Judicial Council (OJC) has similar powers under the Courts of Justice Act as the CJC to make a complaint, investigation, hearing and disposition or conduct a hearing for provincially appointed judges.

Under rule 8.4 (f), a lawyer may not «knowingly assist a judge... in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct.»

(judicial review arising from failures of due process in the Bar's disciplinary arrangements discovered by a report by COIC in 2012; time expired disciplinary judges — whether a tribunal «established by law» under ECHR Art. 6 and Art. 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; whether Art 47 now has direct effect in UK; whether laid down selection process of disciplinary judges had to be followed at all; whether prosecutor could partake in selection process of disciplinary judges; whether a disciplinary judge could properly receive an undisclosed salary from the prosecutor; whether logjam in Visitorial appeals process caused unlawful delay; whether proper Art. 6 security of tenure when BSB sits on committee (COIC) with the power to remove disciplinary judges from the «pool» at will; whether «discreditable» conduct should be defined).

(11) The Judicial Council's hearings and meetings under sections 51.6 and 51.7 shall be open to the public, unless subsection 51.6 (7) applies; its other hearings and meetings may be conducted in private, unless this Act provides otherwise.

(4) Subsection (3) also applies to mediations conducted under section 51.5 and to the Judicial Council's consideration of the question of compensation under section 51.7, if subsection 51.7 (2) applies.

(21) In conducting investigations, in making recommendations under subsection (8) and in making decisions under subsections (13) and (15), the subcommittee shall follow the Judicial Council's guidelines and rules of procedure established under subsection 51.1 (1).

Specific topics which have been covered in recent conferences include judicial ethics; interpreters; delivering reasons for judgment; assessing credibility; social media; technology and search warrants; managing a provincial offence trial; effectively communicating an oral judgment; risk assessment and indicators of lethality at bail hearings; the Youth Criminal Justice Act; eye - witness identification; conducting pre-trials; specific issues at trials of regulatory offences; fly - in - courts, residential schools; application of Gladue principles; mistrials and bias; accident reconstruction; search warrant issues; domestic violence issues; orders for examination under the Mental Health Act; child apprehension warrants under the Child and Family Services Act; evidentiary issues; discrimination and harassment in the workplace; stress management; and pre-retirement planning.

Nonetheless, when Best complained to the Canadian Judicial Council about Justice Shaughnessy's serious misconduct, the CJC didn't even investigate, saying that the judge's actions were not «conduct» under the CJC's mandate.

The complaint in the civil suit against Maggio claimed that Maggio had abused the public trust, which is a class D felony in Arkansas, and that this abuse made him liable to Ms. Bull's estate under the statute that allows victims of a felony to bring a civil action; that Maggio breached a fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs by engaging in conduct that violated certain judicial and statutory rules; that Maggio engaged in a civil conspiracy with Gilbert Baker and Michael Morton; and that Maggio acted in concert with Morton and Baker.

Nothing in KRS 432.230 to 432.270 shall prevent any court or judge from proceeding against any person writing or publishing a libel or slanderous words concerning such court or judge in relation to his judicial conduct in court by indictment, nor prevent any court from punishing any person guilty of a contempt in resisting or disobeying any judicial order or process issued by or under the authority of such court.»

We emphasize that this does not deprive the judge of a remedy where procedural or fairness issues arise in an inquiry, just that the sui generis judicial conduct process under the Judges Act has built into it a mechanism (by way of appeal from the Committee to the Council at the end of the inquiry process) to address those issues through the Council which is itself a superior court.

To a foreign investor affected by such judicial measures, it is not always clear, however, what judicial measures (especially in countries like India with one of the most activist Supreme Courts in the world) can be subject to a claim under investment treaty law; which theory of liability is appropriate for a state's liability arising out of judiciary's conduct (or omissions); and which policy issues these different theories of liability raise.

The Supreme Court considered that the Crown Court can in the same way operate a closed material procedure on PII grounds on an inter partes application under the CJPA, s 59 (7) and that the High Court can conduct a closed material procedure on judicial review of a magistrate's order for a warrant under PACE, s 8 or a magistrate's order for disclosure or a Crown Court's order under s 59 (7) of the 2001 Act.

The far from straightforward case - law on the distinction between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property and its treatment in the judicial search for a fair outcome in the exercise conducted under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 is carefully and clearly analysed in Chapter 5.