Sentences with phrase «under labour arbitrators»

Not exact matches

Non-managerial employees working for a federally regulated employer, such as a bank, or airline, can pursue an unjust dismissal complaint under the Canada Labour Code, which permits an arbitrator to award, among other remedies, reinstatement.

A single arbitrator appointed under The Labour Relations Act [40](LRA) concluded that the union's interpretation was correct.

In doing so, the Court of Appeal held that PIPA is applicable because a labour arbitrator is an «organization» under s. 1 of PIPA.

At the time the doctrine of judicial deference was first developed by the Court in the late 1970s and 1980s, the courts in the labour relations area, in particular, had a poor record of interfering with the sensible development of labour relations policy by labour relations boards and arbitrators under collective bargaining statutes.

However, it determined that an exception under s. 18 (1)(o) of PIPA applied to the requirement to obtain consent, as collection, use and disclosure without consent is «required or authorized by law» based on s. 96 of the Labour Relations Code, which requires arbitrators to file a copy of their awards with the director, who in turn is required by law to make the award «available for public inspection».

For example, arbitrators appointed under the Ontario Labour Relations Act have the statutory authority to make preliminary rulings, while arbitrators in New Brunswick do not.

Under s. 48 (12)(b) of the Ontario Labour Relations Act, an arbitrator is empowered to order pre-hearing disclosures that would provie the authority and discretion to order a psychiatric assessment, especially where there is conflicting medical evidence.

[247] Some labour arbitrators in Ontario have considered a breach of a collective agreement as a factor in assessing undue hardship: see, for example, Chatham - Kent Children's Services v. Ontario Public Service Employees» Union, Local 148 (Bowen Grievance), [2014] O.L.A.A. No. 424 (note, however, that the arbitrator in this case relied on Renaud, supra note 208, a case that arose under British Columbia's Human Rights Act, S.B.C. 1984, which did not enumerate specific factors for assessing undue hardship, as the Ontario Human Rights Code does).

She sits as a grievance arbitrator and unjust dismissal adjudicator under the Canada Labour Code and for a number of years she was a Panel Chair on the Insurance Councils Appeal Board.

Farris partner Alison Narod is an administrative decision - maker, hearing cases as Disciplinary Panel Chair of Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and as a tribunal member in the Community Care and Assisted Living Appeal Board and for a period on the list of arbitrators under BC Labour Relations Code.