Of the 26 maintained mainstream schools
under local authority control in the area, seven have a predicted deficit by the end of this academic year, 10 are predicting one the end of 2018 - 19, and 12 by 2019 - 20.
Not exact matches
The Harris Academy
in Peckham has increased the number of students getting five good GCSEs — from 12 percent when it was
under local authority control to almost 90 percent now.
Academies were first introduced
under Tony Blair's Labour government back
in 2000 as a way to raise standards
in schools by taking them away from the
control of
local authorities and offering more autonomy over finances and day to day school management.
After the case, an HSE inspector said: «Although the school had not been
under local authority control since 2011, it failed to ensure employees and management received adequate training to make up for the loss of
local authority support and ensure that a suitable asbestos management plan was
in place.»
The plans outline that every school will be
in the process of being converted into an academy by 2020, with no schools remaining
under local authority control by 2022.
An Academies Act, passed
in the summer, paved the way for groups of parents, teachers and charities to set up their own «free schools», and for the expansion of the academies programme,
under which schools are being encouraged to «opt out» of
local authority control.
In May 2012, the government's committee on climate change (CCC) published its «advice on how
local authorities can reduce emissions and
control climate risk»
under the 2010 Climate Change Act.
In reaching this decision the following were considered to be decisive factors: (i) LQHT was permeated with state control and influence with a view to meeting the government's aims for aff ordable housing; (ii) the nature and extent of the public subsidy of LQHT's activities; (iii) 10 % of LQHT's stock had been transferred to it from the public sector; (iv) that LQHT, as a registered social landlord, was obliged to cooperate with the local authority, if requested, in offering accommodation to people with priority under the authority's allocation scheme; (v) the termination of a tenancy could not be regarded as separate from housing management so as to be considered an act of a private natur
In reaching this decision the following were considered to be decisive factors: (i) LQHT was permeated with state
control and influence with a view to meeting the government's aims for aff ordable housing; (ii) the nature and extent of the public subsidy of LQHT's activities; (iii) 10 % of LQHT's stock had been transferred to it from the public sector; (iv) that LQHT, as a registered social landlord, was obliged to cooperate with the
local authority, if requested,
in offering accommodation to people with priority under the authority's allocation scheme; (v) the termination of a tenancy could not be regarded as separate from housing management so as to be considered an act of a private natur
in offering accommodation to people with priority
under the
authority's allocation scheme; (v) the termination of a tenancy could not be regarded as separate from housing management so as to be considered an act of a private nature.