Sentences with phrase «under market because»

Not exact matches

This spring, under the headline «Digital Ad Fraud Is Rampant,» one major marketing trade bleakly predicted nothing would be done about all this because everybody in the business was profiting, except marketers.

From what our clients tell us, they chose Fingerprint Marketing because of the accessibility, our hand holding, our creative and unique designs, and the variety of services we offer so they can keep all their marketing under Marketing because of the accessibility, our hand holding, our creative and unique designs, and the variety of services we offer so they can keep all their marketing under marketing under one roof.

«If you were to go on to UberEATS in many of the markets now, we'll be one of the early recommended restaurants, just because the operation that we run now we can actually get from order to delivery in under 30 minutes,» CFO Kevin Ozan said in January.

But it makes sense to boost that allocation now because years of under - performance have made foreign stocks so much more affordable relative to American ones — in Asia and Europe and in emerging markets from South Korea to Turkey.

When various constituencies discuss how the market will look under the wide range of future potential housing finance paradigms, the MBS investor needs to be at the table, because we are the ones who will price out the MBS relative to competing opportunities in the market, which ultimately drives the pricing of primary mortgage rates.

Service firms are getting into the act too: «Beth Harshfield, the owner of Exhibit Arts, an advertising and marketing company in Wichita, Kan., said she started bidding on military contracts six years ago because «I got tired of the local economy kicking the legs out from under us.»

But under McDonald the system grew more cumbersome, in part because the likes of HR and marketing became more powerful.

Because, under a free market system, one could argue they are required to.

Firstly, the iPod and the iPad are probably not good devices to compare with because they were (and are) sold under completely different market conditions.

On the one hand, new liquidity providers are likely to have fewer incentives to support market liquidity under more stressed conditions, because they lack access to any ancillary revenues from their clients.

Aetna has mostly pulled out of the individual markets under Obamacare for 2018 because of instability, with enrollment below expectations and premiums soaring.

«I generally always try to buy under market value with real estate so even if the market is flat or not growing I still make money because there is some in built - in equity buffer, although this is getting harder in the current market.»

Sprouts Farmers Market flies under the radar of many investors because it's not really a headline - making stock.

The Strategic Growth Fund is not appropriate for investors who wish to speculate under that specific set of conditions, because we have no historical evidence that it is sensible to take market risk, on average, once that syndrome emerges.

I know my earlier book Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First has changed lives, and this book not only expands and amplifies those powerful concepts under a specifically eco-friendly lens, its also going to reach a lot more people because it has the support and power not only of my personal network, but also the resources of both a big NYC publisher (John Wiley & Sons) and my superstar co-author, Mr. Guerrilla Marketing himself, Jay Conrad Levinson — the man who brought us not only all the Guerrilla Marketing books but also Uniteds Friendly Skies, Allstates Good Hands, and even the Marlboro Man.

I do believe that the market under - appreciates certain companies that have really strong moats because often times this durability allows for the company's runway to last longer than many expect.

But because oil prices have tanked so much and they're thought to be set on global markets — so not really under the Fed's control — recently they've been targeting the core PCE (sans energy and food prices).

We can argue about that, but there's no denying that D - F was put in place precisely because under - regulated financial markets helped inflate the housing bubble which kinda blew up the economy.

Whether the market rises or falls, or our portfolio is up or down, we try to have a good day every day, because the actions that define a «good day» are under our control.

Then they lean on President Obama and Tim Geithner to tell the Europeans: «You have to make Greece pay, so that we win the bets that we've made, because if we lose the bets, then we go under and the stock market crashes, and a lot of people can't collect on their money market funds.»

Because Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. or their affiliates will receive more than 5 % of the proceeds of this offering in connection with the repayment of our credit agreement, each of Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is deemed to have a conflict of interest under Rule 5121.

Under terms of the proposed agreement, Grab would buy out Uber's operations in certain markets in Southeast Asia and Uber will take a stake in Grab, the people said, asking not to be named because the talks are private.

We, on the other hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.

For example, if Bitcoin is not a currency, then Bitcoin forwards and Bitcoin swaps that involve the exchange of Bitcoin for another currency will not fall under the statutory definitions of the more lightly regulated foreign exchange forwards or foreign exchange swaps.10 Likewise, retail trading of Bitcoin derivatives will be limited to designated contract markets, rather than subject to the retail foreign exchange dealer regulations.11 Treating Bitcoin as a commodity that is not a currency dovetails with the stances taken by other U.S. regulators such as the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)(virtual currency does not have all of the attributes of real currency) 12, the Securities and Exchange Commission (Bitcoin investments are investment contracts because Bitcoin is a form of money) 13 and the Internal Revenue Service (treating Bitcoin as property for tax purposes).14

Some market participants say ICOs could be illegal because the companies are selling tokens that can be considered securities, which fall under the SEC's jurisdiction.

The rigging of gold persists without regulatory or legal interference because it is based on a straightforward deal between the profiteering Deep State financial elite, and the western governments they control: the criminals are allowed to manipulate the gold market however brazenly they wish and keep whatever sums they steal, as long as they keep the gold price under control.

Maybe because in contrast to the conservative evangelicals, there is not the massive media industry operating vast television and radio broadcast networks and commercial marketing programs operating under the guise of «ministries.»

«We brewed it under license for a while and because of the growth that we've seen with Mackeson being in a number of our Caribbean markets — we were head to head with Guinness sharing up to 50 percent of the market with Guinness — we just believe this brand could globally, in time, be the No. 2 stout brand in the world,» Henderson says.

Irvine is under pressure in the dairy market because Lion is about to lose one of his single largest contracts in Australia to rival group Murray Goulburn Co-operative.

«Their passion was making sauces but they struggled to sell them under their own brand in supermarkets because they have no marketing budget and expertise and couldn't afford an account manager,» said Woolworths managing director of Australian supermarkets, Tjeerd Jegen.

See also Lucy Barbour, «Competition watchdog ACCC head Rod Simms (sic) denies claims an «effects test» would be «economically dangerous» (ABC Rural, 18 August 2014), in which the ACCC Chairman defends the ACCC's proposed effects test (and is also reported as saying that the current case against Coles was brought under the unconscionable conduct provisions rather than under s 46 because the misuse of market power prohibitions is a law that exists only between competitors...)

Many independent supermarket retailers would be unlikely to be able to commit to a new entrant in the pleaded market because a significant number of them have exclusive supply arrangements with Metcash, which holds equity in a number of the companies operating stores under the IGA banner, and which is the landlord in respect of a number of stores operated under the IGA banner.

«It is all well and good for Wenger to say he is on a one - man crusade against the transfer market escalating prices and that is very admirable, but actually it is poor planning because if you had gone out and got someone like Shkodran Mustafi at the beginning of the window, he wouldn't be under this pressure that he is now.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Our attitude in the transfer market is the same — go for the bargains so if they don't work they fly under the radar or wait until the last minute and get the players the other big teams don't want or try to pick up the player that is no longer wanted because a new big signing has come in.

If you are feeling confident you can also bet on the over 3.5 or 4.5 goal markets as well, but there isn't much point betting on the «under» parts of these markets because the odds are usually low (there are often 4 goals or less in a match).

Nestle does not include complementary foods (i.e. baby food) in its definition of breastmilk substitutes because it says they are not marketed for children under 6 months of age.

The placement of the Similac ad on your website is particularly dangerous because it is adjacent to a Health Canada article, «10 Valuable Tips for Successful Breastfeeding», despite the fact that research clearly indicates that formula marketing is most successful when it is done under the guise of promoting breastfeeding.

Labour are competitive despite Corbyn — and they're competitive because of the legacy power of the Labour brand on key issues like healthcare and housing, and also because Labour have created and marketed so many retail policies (which, to be fair, has occurred under Corbyn's leadership).

Under his leadership, Galicia prospered substantially, though not as much as Fraga had hoped, in part because he preferred state - run economies as opposed to markets, and adopted Gaullist - like economic policies with strong state planning, rather than free market programmes.

«The village of Elmsford is not part of the 31 eligible communities under the settlement, and that doesn't mean that just because we are building affordable housing in various communities that you can't have market - based housing,» says Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino who was invited to the ribbon cutting of the new amenities.

Formerly marketed by Merck & Co. under the trade names Vioxx, Ceoxx and Ceeoxx, it was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in 2004 because of concerns about increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Most developed countries see carbon markets as crucial under any new agreement because they seek out the cheapest emissions reductions, making climate change targets more achievable.

«If we are to conserve remaining wild populations of elephants, we must close all markets because, under current levels of corruption, they can not be controlled in a way that does not provide opportunities for illegal ivory being laundered into legal markets,» said the paper's author, Elizabeth Bennett, WCS Vice President for Species Conservation.

We do not knowingly collect personal information from children under 13 for marketing purposes, but because some information is collected electronically, it can appear to be the personal information of the purchaser of the product, and will be treated as such by this privacy policy.

Most people who train to build muscle operate under the assumption that they should only train arms once a week because that is what others have told them at the gym and the magazines on the market.

Unfortunately, many of the oral pure NAD + supplements you see on the market today don't typically induce the benefits described above, because they are often severely under dosed and ineffective.

The first rendition of the modern All Star was designed in 1917, and marketed under the name «Non-Skids», which makes sense because these shoes definitely have traction!

«Oracle helps us bridge the gap between customer marketing and acquisition marketing because they have so many different products under their umbrella,» said Tracy.