Sentences with phrase «under oath if»

Insurers frequently conduct an examination under oath if they suspect a claim is fraudulent.

The members of the LERB can call witnesses and hear evidence under oath if asked to do so but the board can decide not to accept new evidence.

You also have a duty to provide honest and truthful statements, provide an inventory or proof of purchases where applicable, and even to submit to an examination under oath if requested by the adjuster.

A common practice by insurers is to conduct an examination under oath if they suspect a claim is fraudulent.

Insurers frequently conduct an examination under oath if they suspect a claim is fraudulent.

B. Upon the written request of an authorized representative of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, Settling Defendants shall submit written reports or respond to written interrogatories, under oath if requested, relating to any of the matters contained in this Final Judgment as may be requested.

Insurers frequently conduct an examination under oath if they suspect a claim is fraudulent.

Not exact matches

«Mark Zuckerberg ought to be subpoenaed if he doesn't appear voluntarily, to appear under oath, in public, along with other CEOs in the same space,» Senator Richard Blumenthal told reporters on Monday night.

And, testifying under oath, Summers, now the president of Harvard, dismissed the adverse consequences of his friends» frisky financial behavior: «I had enough knowledge of Russian mores and Russian practices and Russian views from the conversations that I had with Chubais and Vasiliev [senior Russian officials] to be confident that the set of issues contained the allegations were not issues that were consequential for them; and indeed that they would have, in part, valued advisers more extensively if they were more involved in actual private - sector activities.»

Examinations under oath can be extremely broad and if a policyholder does not cooperate in any way, insurance companies can use that as grounds to deny their claim.

Giuliani contends that even if Trump was told about it, he wouldn't have remembered it and that he wasn't «under oath.»

Quote: «If anyone disagrees with anything I say, I am quite prepared to not only retract it, but also to deny under oath I ever said it.»

If Trump is deposed and lies under oath, he could be impeached for perjury just as Clinton was.

If someone divorces they get all of their friends to sing (under oath) a lie (absolute lie) that the other spouse did not want children.

To be unaware of the true dimensions of life, to be insensitive to the realities beyond your narrow little swath of existence, to talk to no one save the people who mirror your own prejudices back to you, to be the victim of your own narrow insecurity in life, this is to bear false witness just as surely as if you testified to the truth of a lie under oath.

19 And the priest shall put her under oath, and say to the woman, «If no man has lain with you, and if you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a cu «rsIf no man has lain with you, and if you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a cu «rsif you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a cu «rse.

20 But if you have gone astray while under your husband's authority, and if you have defiled yourself and some man other than your husband has lain with you» — 21 then the priest shall put the woman under the oath of the cu «rse, and he shall say to the woman — «the Lord make you a cu «rse and an oath among your people, when the Lord makes your thigh rot and your belly swell; 22 and may this water that causes the cu «rse go into your stomach, and make your belly swell and your thigh rot.

19 «The priest shall have her take an oath and shall say to the woman, «If no man has lain with you and if you have not gone astray into uncleanness, being under the authority of your husband, be immune to this water of bitterness that brings a curse; 20if you, however, have gone astray, being under the authority of your husband, and if you have defiled yourself and a man other than your husband has had intercourse with you» 21 (then the priest shall have the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman), «the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people by the LORD»S making your thigh waste away and your abdomen swell; 22and this water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.&raquIf no man has lain with you and if you have not gone astray into uncleanness, being under the authority of your husband, be immune to this water of bitterness that brings a curse; 20if you, however, have gone astray, being under the authority of your husband, and if you have defiled yourself and a man other than your husband has had intercourse with you» 21 (then the priest shall have the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman), «the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people by the LORD»S making your thigh waste away and your abdomen swell; 22and this water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.&raquif you have not gone astray into uncleanness, being under the authority of your husband, be immune to this water of bitterness that brings a curse; 20if you, however, have gone astray, being under the authority of your husband, and if you have defiled yourself and a man other than your husband has had intercourse with you» 21 (then the priest shall have the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman), «the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people by the LORD»S making your thigh waste away and your abdomen swell; 22and this water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.&raquif you, however, have gone astray, being under the authority of your husband, and if you have defiled yourself and a man other than your husband has had intercourse with you» 21 (then the priest shall have the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman), «the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people by the LORD»S making your thigh waste away and your abdomen swell; 22and this water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.&raquif you have defiled yourself and a man other than your husband has had intercourse with you» 21 (then the priest shall have the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman), «the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people by the LORD»S making your thigh waste away and your abdomen swell; 22and this water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.»

20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have defiled yourself by sleeping with a man other than your husband» — 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse of the oath — «may the LORD cause your people to curse and denounce you when he causes your thigh to waste away and your abdomen to swell.

Moreover, if it's only a one year extension, the Mayor could be forced to come up to Albany next year and explain all this to Senate Republicans while under oath.

As a member of the Democratic MAJORITY party, nothing would make me happier than having a full on torture / war crimes investigation, under oath, with a penalty of prison time if convicted.

If you forced me to answer under oath, I'd probably select the Stormy Daniels «Update» segment as the «better» one, whatever «better» means in the subjective world of sketch comedy.

(b) If the respondent named in a charge filed under section 706 fails or refuses to comply with a demand of the Commission for permission to examine or to copy evidence in conformity with the provisions of section 709 (a), or if any person required to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) fails or refuses to do so, or if any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kepIf the respondent named in a charge filed under section 706 fails or refuses to comply with a demand of the Commission for permission to examine or to copy evidence in conformity with the provisions of section 709 (a), or if any person required to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) fails or refuses to do so, or if any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kepif any person required to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) fails or refuses to do so, or if any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kepif any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kept.

Gore, if found guilty of encouraging the endangered owl to lie under oath, could face congressional censure on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and owl - fucking.

At least one CEO is said to have «admitted under oath» to calling two other CEOs in late January 2010 «specifically to learn if the other two Publisher Defendants would sign with Apple prior to Apple's iPad launch.»

Again, if you get to a stage where you're under oath, you've got bigger problems.

You might even be required to make statements under oath, if it comes to that.

If the trustee suspects that you might have left assets out of your bankruptcy papers, they will schedule a 2004 exam and ask you questions under oath.

Examinations under oath can be extremely broad and if a policyholder does not cooperate in any way, insurance companies can use that as grounds to deny their claim.

«They are really fun if you are the attorney taking the examination under oath,» Stein said.

If you are asked, on a whiteness stand, under oath; can you personally prove that it was any warming; or are you just repeating liar's lies?!

So if there's a civil trial Gleick will have to take the stand and answer under oath everything he knows about the source of the forgery.

The truth will out if or maybe when Gleick is put under oath...

If suggesting that you will have issues testifying under oath is a threat of personal intimidation, why don't you have the guts to publish what I said?

The NAS (North) Report If North et al agreed with the Wegman findings, as they testified to the House Subcommittee under oath, how did this get expressed in the NAS panel report?

I'm an attorney and I'm pretty confident that if I could get Gavin Schmidt or James Hansen «in the box,» i.e. in a position where I could question them under oath with no opportunity to dodge, evade, or refuse to answer, I could completely humiliate them and demolish their positions.

If you do it under oath you go to jail for it.

Well, they would if they were under oath in front of Congress.

It drives me nuts that this man can be financially rewarded for saying things that would land him in prison if he declared them under oath.

However, defence counsel should not ask the witnesses if they believe the accused would lie under oath.199

If it is indeed a «crazy» move to lie under oath, then an order to testify means they'll have to admit their crime, plead guilty, and be convicted.

If someone makes a statement under oath and knows it is false, that person commits perjury.

I can also spend some time cross examining that witness on his or her understanding of what verification requires and on the concept of perjury (by answering interrogatories «under oath» the witness becomes subject to perjury if the answers are both material and knowingly false).

That way if the witness attempts to shift blame to his or her attorney, I can pull out the verification and show that the witness is being even more evasive by attempting the shift blame to the attorney for answers that witness verified under oath.

Side note: even if client lied, the client can not be prosecuted for that lie, because statements to an Atty are not under oath.

(2) If requested by the insurer, an applicant shall submit to an examination under oath, but is not required,

Is Goodling taking the Fifth because if she testifies under oath she would lie and face perjury charges rather than tell the truth?

If you won't agree to that, I'll consent to being examined under oath and answer the questions posed.

For example, the Canada Evidence Act states that the evidence of a person who affirms shall have the same effect «as if» taken under oath.

Under Alberta legislation, a witness may make an affirmation and declaration if they object to taking an oath, or are objected to as incompetent to take an oath, and the judge is satisfied of this.