Sentences with phrase «under patent since»

Within hours of the decision, the University of Washington and Ambry Genetics, a closely held company in Aliso Viejo, California, said they would immediately offer expanded testing that included the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which Myriad has had under patent since the late 1990s.

Not exact matches

-LSB-...] Since then, many additional Apple patents on sophisticated under - display cameras and sensors have been filed, all referencing and building on this initial patent that started it all.

Until recently the payments had been upheld under the «scope of the patent test» since under the terms of settlement, the delayed generic entry still took place before the branded patent expired.

Since that post, there have been exciting developments in the progress of the two most advanced of these immunotherapies: PD01A, the AS - targeting active vaccine from Austrian biotechnology startup AFFiRiS AG, developed using its patented «AFFITOME» neo-antigen discovery platform of molecular mimicry; and PRX002, a humanized monoclonal Ab (mAb) under development from Prothena Corp PLC, the successor of aggregate - clearing immunotherapy pioneer Élan Pharmaceuticals.

Here since the «475 Patent did not claim a formulation and only claimed medicinal ingredients the «475 Patent should properly have been considered by the Minister or the Federal Court under section 4 (2)(a) which deals with claims to medicinal ingredients.

Oil States also argues that since the eighteenth century, actions challenging the validity of issued patents have been decided by courts of law, and thus the patent owner's right to a jury trial is preserved under the Seventh Amendment.

«It's pretty cool that patent examiners still show up, since they don't really have to under this loosey - goosey management system that hasn't been updated since Jimmy Carter was in the White House.»

Since joining JAMS, Judge Roberts has been appointed as a discovery master by federal and state courts to supervise discovery and review privileged documents in complex commercial, patent, and product liability cases, as an election monitor for unions under court supervision, as a consultant to monitor a four - year consent decree in an EEOC pattern and practice case against a major restaurant chain, and as a trustee for a 36 - story commercial retail and office building on Fifth Avenue

I'm so very skeptical because the USPTO has taken a long time since the filing of the reexamination requests to issue this Office action and, which is far more meaningful, it has determined that this design patent's single claim «stands twice rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a)[obviousness], rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a) / 102 (e)[obviousness in connection with a published patent application], and rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (e).»

It confirms that the patents and licenses that have been issued by Ontario since 1912 and under which private proponents have been operating will not be rendered invalid due to Canada's non-involvement in the issuance of such patents and licenses.

Regardless of the disclosure obligations under the PSIA, since Mr. Brown complied with section 27 of the Patent Act, more specifically with the Patent Rules and its Forms, section 53 could not be triggered in the circumstances.

Unfortunately for IV (and Bill Gates / Microsoft since they are IV's largest customer) and any other patent troll, since the licenses they obtained are obtained under duress (license my crappy patents or the troll will sue), the licenses are completely illusory.

Since the proposal covers software, it's possible that grantees might want to apply for patents for a few of the works covered under the policy.