Sentences with phrase «under should only»

Finally, please understand that children 3 and under should only wear jewelry under close parental supervision.

Children 10 and under should only participate in these experiments under the supervision of an adult.

Not exact matches

Non-GAAP information is not prepared under a comprehensive set of accounting rules and should only be used to supplement an understanding of Gilead's operating results as reported under GAAP.

The «checkings account» wallet should only be used for quick access and you should keep under $ 100 worth of Bitcoin Cash in that wallet.

Mr. Barton said he was not trying to suggest that BP shouldn't pay the costs, only that the energy giant had been denied due process under the U.S. legal system.

In rendering her decision, District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn stated that the Coalition's motion should be granted because its proposed brief «provides a unique perspective» as the only filing party «representative of financial professionals in the United States already operating under a fiduciary standard.»

In 1966 the 6 - volume report declared that fairness should be the foremost objective of the taxation system; the existing system was not only too complicated and inefficient, but under it the poor paid more than their fair share while the wealthy avoided taxes through various loopholes.

But we should also keep in mind that Under Armour is still driving stellar growth in international markets, where revenue climbed 52 % (57 % at constant currency) last quarter and still only comprised around 20 % of total sales.

Despite the exemptive relief from dealer registration requirements provided by the securities regulators in these decisions, issuers should bear in mind that under applicable Canadian securities laws a person is only required to register as a dealer if they are engaging in or holding themselves out as engaging in the business of dealing in securities.

Under these circumstances, you should only consider buying a variable annuity because of its other features, such as lifetime income payments and death benefit protection.

It's important to note that under the rules of HUD (the US Department of Housing and Urban Development), your lender can only hold up to two months of payments, and should not ask you for extra payments as «cushion» beyond that limit.

Graham warns that only companies of a certain caliber should be considered for this strategy: 10 + years of strong earnings under their belt, with no negative annual earnings, and they must have cash to survive a continued downturn.

U.S. District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn stated the Coalition's motion should be granted because its proposed brief «provides a unique perspective» as the only filing party «representative of financial professionals in the United States already operating under a fiduciary standard.»

The only change in society is that all life - long partnerships are treated equally under the law — and that is the way it should be.

Not only must one be ready for both events, one should live under the weight of eternity that both place before the mind.

The study, conducted in May of 2014, responded to a 2013 poll by Lifeway Research, which stated that only 8 percent of American adults felt that «under God» should be removed from the Pledge.

For their part, AHA inserted «a brief description of the history of the Pledge of Allegiance, including the information that «under God» was only added as recently as 1954 in response to the Cold War and that some Americans feel that the Pledge should focus on unity rather than religion.»

Only children under the age of 6, should believe in Santa.

Training in pastoral counseling should include not only intensive study of the literature and case seminars, but also clinical training in a hospital under a trained supervisor.

But the orthodoxy of a Catholic theologian should not be suspect only because he does his duty honestly and weighing his own views, remaining in an open dialogue with the magisterium and prepared to leave the last word to the authorities of the Church, always lovingly adapting his individual under - standing of the faith to that of the whole Church.

For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support...

The Aristotelian universal should not be thought of as an abstract essence which has only a contingent relationship to the particulars which are subsumed under it.

Only a human with such disregard for religion and for our earth could write that the POPULATION SHOULD BE KEPT UNDER» 500,000.»

Judge made the biggest mistake of his life to let that mosque to be built.and problem is that people will pay heavily for that decision.Islam is the source of problem, Koran is the source problem.They use our freedom of religion, they sneak in cities under the name of peace and love then they strike hard, though other religions have no rights in their contries.Here is statement from Omar Ahmed chairman of the Board of council on America Islamic Relation:» Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth «Does this sounds to you religionf peace, love and logic?or terrorist thresd for thr future?

(a) Christianity tells people not only what they should believe, but what they MUST believe under threat of «burning in hell» or other of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them;

(a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they must believe under threat of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them;

The common principle here is only that each human should be moving toward actualization, with others, in and under the divine Love — a Love, one may be sure, that prefers variety, novelty, and even oddity (if I may say so!)

So the laws of matter, while they can of course and should be studied and unravelled from the point of view of material science, will only find their full perspective and interpretation in the highest synthesis of all - the Incarnation and the gathering of things under Christ as Head.

The only foothold for Episcopal control is in the following from article 5, which suggests that the priest should «ensure that the welfare of these faithful harmonises with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the guidance of the bishop in accordance with canon 392, avoiding discord and favouring the unity of the whole Church.»

(a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they MUST believe under threat of «burning in hell» or other of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them;

Although Americans remain split between the «pro-life» and «pro-choice» labels, only 20 % think abortion should be illegal in all circumstances, while 77 % say it should be legal under all or some circumstances.

It ought to be inconceivable to a Christian that any obstacle, beyond those of temporal and finite necessity, should be placed in the way of the full and free growth, in and under God, of any man or woman or child, because each and all of them now must be seen as blood - brothers, not of us only, but of the most - high God.

In this section, I have been concerned to show that the genetic approach is not only contradicted by all relevant external evidence, but also employs an extremely dangerous interpretative strategy: dangerous to the piecemeal investigation of Whiteheadian doctrines; dangerous to the mind - set with which new interpretations of Whitehead's philosophy should be received and evaluated and dangerous because of the inherent circularity of its reasoning, to the integrity and validity of any compositional analysis conducted under the umbrella of its assumptions.

Unless it can be independently known that the entity under consideration could be present only in a perceptible manner, we should concede that the question of the entity's presence has been left open rather than decided negatively.

As Christ was sent, so too are we commissioned to go forth under the sign of his cross into the marketplaces of our contemporary society, equipped to tell the story encapsuled in John 3:16: «For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life.»

George H. W. Bush declaring (while I was serving in the military, and just before he became president) saying that atheists not only are not patriots, but they should not be citizens, and declared it was because we are one nation under god... a belief that he can not prove... he never apologized.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

If I now proceed to state my own hypothesis about the farther limits of this extension of our personality, I shall be offering my own over-belief — though I know it will appear a sorry under - belief to some of you — for which I can only bespeak the same indulgence which in a converse case I should accord to yours.

Dr Chito Medina, MASIPAG partner scientist, said that Health Impact Assessments and Environmental Impact Assessments as required under the JDC should be done by an independent group of experts, and the process can not be confined from the data presented only by the proponents.

Perhaps you have only known Arsenal under Wenger this last decade and so have no comparison to how a team should be properly motivated.

should hire mma figheters to kick the crab out of our players when they lose our players only play well under pressure the mma fighters will scare the hell out of them they will be under pressure they will play well every single match and well win the quadruple

The first goal chambers didn't get his head on a simple stoke's cross, the cross was only his head height and he wasn't under pressure, sure the ball had a bit of spin but it shouldn't have gone past the first man; the second goal mertersaker and chambers both ball watched and failed to track one runner into the box; the third goal chambers got out - muscled and rooted to the ground while walters jumped on top of him for a clean header, in the six yard box.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

i think we should sell TW just to see if he dose better under another manager so for us to know whether or not we are holding back progress with players, OX its still early days not much improvement there, JW did well only for a short while at Bournemouth but Arsenal runs in his veins of JW he will only be happy at Arsenal

I even went on to mention how its not only Iwobi that's stagnant under Wenger, I mentioned our so called youngsters who should be soaring but are no where to be found, add Bellerin to that list!!

«Fans should cheer for Temple because the Owls will only continue to get better under head coach Matt Rhule.

Ohio State's been getting first - place love from our friends at OBNUG all season because of its compilation of wins over FBS teams, but now that there are only two teams left with goose eggs under the L, there should be a worthwhile comparison between those two teams for the No. 1 spot... except there just isn't.

Perfect player that should be first choice, and in a years time he'll only have a handful of starts under his belt, whilst others in the same position consistently under perform.

What I can't understand (and never mentioned) is why Sanchez was only signed under a 4 year contract, 5 years should have been the bare minimum with the club having a further 1 year option to take up!!

He should have inform earlier those kinda offer not when his under some immense pressure then only those kinda story came out....