The federal government could, however, decide to resume enforcing these laws any time it wanted to and the states would have little - to - no recourse to stop it from doing so, other than attempting to argue in court that federal drug laws aren't authorized
under the Constitution in the first place.
As for Congress, the Obama climate team has always bluntly communicated the limits on presidential discretion
under the Constitution in explaining what the country can, and can't commit to in these negotiations.
Questioned about rights of privacy, the appellate judge cited several amendments in the Bill of Rights and said, «I do think the right to privacy is protected
under the Constitution in various ways.»
Not exact matches
Davis sought Supreme Court review after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled
in May that the failure to obtain a warrant did not violate Davis» right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures
under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
People, person, or persons as used
in this
Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States
under this
Constitution.
«It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance
in which it would be necessary and appropriate
under the
Constitution and applicable laws... for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,» he wrote.
Congress has formal authority over trade policy
under the US
Constitution, but it has generally delegated much of its authority to the executive branch
in modern times.
Given that Congress jealously guards its powers
under the
Constitution, such an effort would likely gain the support of representatives from most states, not only those with an economic interest
in maintaining NAFTA.
Remember, health and safety are clearly
under provincial jurisdiction
in our
Constitution.
Under Section 92A of the
Constitution Act, provinces, «may make laws
in relation to the export from the province to another part of Canada of the primary production from non-renewable natural resources.»
A logical and well thought arguments backed by solid facts are the primary requirements
under the
Constitution to put a stop to any business
in India»
Equality
under and before the law is a solemn promise conveyed to all our citizens
in the
Constitution itself.
«We urge the Iranian government to uphold this right for religious minorities
in Iran,
in line with its obligations
under international law and the provisions upholding the rights of religious minorities
in its own
constitution.»
It removes proposals to revise the
Constitution from the realm of partisan political controversy, and it necessitates the retention of means, similar to those which have been used
in the past, to give the needed flexibility to the development of the Constitutional system — means which, as we have already seen, placed the political destinies of the American people
under the immediate direction of a group of benevolent guardians.
They are revealed by God's historical and dialogical self - revelation by words and deeds, and
in the fullness of time by God's eternal Son becoming flesh
in a certain time and space of history;
in church history
under the guidance of the Holy Spirit they have to be witnessed to and developed through the living tradition (see the dogmatic
constitution Dei Verbum, 2, 8).
In Lucia v. SEC, the argument centered on the question of whether administrative judges are wielding the power to settle cases decisively and issue orders, even though they are not appointed and confirmed as judges according to the form prescribed
under Article III of the
Constitution.
(A decision for same - sex marriage by a state could as
in the case of Massachusetts, preempts the debate
in that state, but it is less far - reaching because it leaves other states to arrive at a different conclusion — unless, as some same - sex - marriage proponents have claimed, other states are required to recognize such marriages
under the
Constitution's requirement of giving «full faith and credit» to other states» proceedings.)
Seven of the nine justices voted
in favor of making abortion a fundamental right
under the
Constitution.
Tom Tom «He doesn't seem to grasp the idea that we «agree» to have a system of jurisprudence that determines what is legal and what is not
in such a way as to preserve our individual rights as they are guaranteed to us
under our
Constitution»
If the framers of the
Constitution had been more morally courageous
in identifying slavery as an evil, or if the later compensatory amendment had rooted liberty
in a common human nature rather than on weaker procedural grounds of equality
under the law, then perhaps the expansion of protected classes and arbitrary rights would not have advanced so stridently.
In this sense they are more like books or magazines than television, and they are entitled to the same protection
under the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution accorded books and magazines.
Ignacio Comonfort was the first president elected
under the
constitution of 1857,
in which the Church was legally restrained.
The most sustained religious discussion
in these huge volumes has to do with the line
in Article VI of the
Constitution that «no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust
under the United States.»
The executive role
in foreign affairs, at least
under the
Constitution, pales
in comparison to that of Congress.
I, RICK PERRY, Governor of Texas,
under the authority vested
in me by the
Constitution and Statutes of the State of Texas, do hereby proclaim the three - day period from Friday, April 22, 2011, to Sunday, April 24, 2011, as Days of Prayer for Rain
in the State of Texas.
Few believers are likely to pledge their allegiance to a government
under which the courts»
in the name of «constitutional rights» they themselves have sole authority to read into the
Constitution» can systematically close off any form of political opposition by declaring it to betray the «inevitable inference» of animus.
Strauss seems to say it's found
in the clasical view of the best
constitution: All human ends are hierarchically ordered
under the highest human end.
We decide our own laws - as long as they fall
under the umbrella of a
Constitution written with the protection of individual freedom
in mind.
Thus, Nicholas Lash -
in, of course, The Tablet - on the Apostolic
constitution which has authorised and enabled the setting up of jurisdictions
under which Anglicans may become Roman Catholics not individually but collectively.
[40]
In the
constitution under Section V: The Sacraments of the Church, Sub-Section: A. Baptism, Clause 4, we read:
Homosexuality is not a protected class
under the U.S.
Constitution, so discrimination
in this way is not wrong.
This was not possible or practical
in his day nor is it
in ours
under the kind of
Constitution we have.
Whichever scholar has the better argument, they agree that the decision focused the debate over slavery and introduced into the already heady brew of issues involved
in that debate the question of the scope of judicial power
under the
Constitution.
The rulers, who, as
in Shõtoku's
constitution, represent heaven, are to provide a nurturant and paternal regime
under which the people can flourish.
Even today, some scholars argue that it did nothing more than declare that the Supreme Court is within its rights
in declining to exercise an authority putatively conferred upon it by Congress when such authority exceeds the jurisdiction granted to the Court
under Article Three of the
Constitution.
Like others who support the original understanding of the
Constitution, I disagree with many of the Supreme Court's decisions
under the establishment clause, but
in our system of government a federal - district judge like Judge Jones is bound by those decisions.
United
in it,
under its new
constitution adopted at Jerusalem and
under the farseeing chairmanship of Dr. John R. Mott, are not only all the Protestant missionary forces of the West, but also the National Christian Councils which
in recent years have come into being
in China, Japan, India and many other parts of what is commonly called the missionary field.
In answer to the objection against the lack of religious test for an officeholder
under the new
Constitution, Isaac Backus, outstanding Baptist minister, gave a stirring speech.
That the phrase «separation of church and state» does not appear
in the text of the
Constitution assumes much importance, it seems, to some who may have once labored
under the misimpression it was there and, upon learning they were mistaken, reckon they've discovered a key to solving a Constitutional mystery.
Under such a worldview, the religious liberty guaranteed
in the First Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution is downgraded to a more manageable freedom of worship, with the secularizing elites implicitly claiming to preside impartially over the rival communities of the faithful.
Fast - tracking, according to journalist Dave Johnson enables Congress to agree «to set aside its duties
under Article 1 Section 8 of the
Constitution and vote on TPP within 90 days of it being signed, to severely limit discussion and debate, not to filibuster the agreement
in the Senate and not to amend it not matter what problems turn up after the agreement is revealed».
The Founding Fathers reached consensus that republicanism contains a provision to abolish and reform the government
under new foundational laws, and is embodied
in Article 4, section 4 of the
Constitution.
Under the 1959
constitution there was an elected Legislative Council (Malay: Majlis Mesyuarat Negera), but only one election has ever been held,
in 1962.
Schneiderman last year filed a legal challenge to major fantasy sports operators, arguing the companies
in New York act as «games of chance» — outlawed
under the state's
Constitution.
In a way, I'm saying there should be no election until we have a new
constitution under the Sovereign National Conference.
This
Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made
in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges
in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing
in the
Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
If the father and / or mother of the baby born at Palmyra Island were U.S. citizens that would have been an alternate means by which the child would be a U.S. citizen at birth
in that case, and a U.S. citizen is also
under the U.S.
Constitution a citizen of the U.S. state
in which he or she resides.
Our clients have directed us
in the circumstances to petition His Excellency the President of the Republic to exercise his powers of prerogative of mercy
under Article 72 of the
Constitution of Ghana».
This
Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made
in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges
in every state shall be bound thereby, anything
in the
Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
Said President Weah: «Article 7 — The Republic shall, consistent with the principles of individual freedom and social justice enshrined
in this
Constitution, manage the national economy and the natural resources of Liberia
in such manner as shall ensure the maximum feasible participation of Liberian citizens
under conditions of equality, so as to advance the general welfare of the Liberian people and the economic development of Liberia.»