Sentences with phrase «under the protocol account»

A press release circulated by the Japanese government added up the cold but convincing numbers: ``... the total emissions of energy - related CO2 from the countries undertaking obligations to reduce emissions under the Protocol account for only about 27 percent of the global emissions in 2008, which dropped down from 42 percent in 1990.

Not exact matches

With the enhancement of the dignity of the bishop and the extension of his judicial authority under the patronage of the Empire, the old cathedra upon which the ante-Nicene bishop had sat in his capacity as teacher, was gradually converted into a veritable throne, imitative of that of the emperor.25 It is quite possible that the courtly protocol and the sartorial details of the so - called Donation of Constantine are a reasonably accurate description of the dress, insignia, and prerogatives of the chief bishop of the West in the late imperial period, that even the account of the bestowal of these privileges primarily errs in fictionally ascribing to one emperor what was probably done by several in the course of the fourth and fifth centuries, and that once the fictional monopolization of these prerogatives by one bishop is removed, the Donation is recognized as supplying us with a picture of a late imperial prelate.26

ClimateCare will therefore not fund projects in countries that have binding targets under the Kyoto Protocol (i.e. developed countries that have ratified the Protocol) during the period when they have legally binding targets unless it can be assured that the emission reductions can be «retired» from the national account.

The document, in addition to the key initial accounting parameters, has also contained annual information on: (a) total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the sources listed in Annex A to the Kyoto Protocol; (b) GHG emissions and removals from land use, land - use change and forestry activities under Article 3, paragraph 3, of the Kyoto Protocol, and elected activities under Article 3, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol; and (c) transactions and holdings of Kyoto Protocol units.

Recognizing this, the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakesh Accords, adopted by CMP 1 in Montreal, Canada, in December 2005, include a set of monitoring and compliance procedures to enforce the Protocol's rules, address any compliance problems, and avoid any error in calculating emissions data and accounting for transactions under the three Kyoto mechanisms (emissions trading, clean development mechanism and joint implementation) and activities related to land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF).

More information on accounting of LULUCF activities under the Kyoto Protocol in the first commitment period is contained in the Kyoto Protocol Reference Manual.

Unlike the Convention, which includes all emissions and removals from LULUCF in a Party total emissions, the Kyoto Protocol restricts the accounting of the LULUCF sector to emissions and removals from specific activities that are defined under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Protocol.

Guidance on reporting and accounting of LULUCF activities under the Kyoto Protocol applicable in the first commitment period differs from the one applicable in the second commitment period.

Modalities, rules and guidelines for accounting of LULUCF activities under Articles 3.3 and 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol in the first commitment period

Depending of the reported commitment period, accounting of the LULUCF activities under the Kyoto Protocol shall apply guidelines contained in the following decisions: The annex to decision 16 / CMP.1: Land use, land - use change and forestry provides rules for accounting of LULUCF activities under KP in the first commitment period.

Since then, events have told a rather different story, with the U.S. waging a multi-front campaign — organizing a global network of bilateral agreements designed to render the U.N. climate process «irrelevant», sending out its flacks to argue that fossil technologies like «clean coal» and carbon capture are the best ways forward, insisting that the under - funded climate secretariat separate its Kyoto Protocol accounts from those related to the Framework Convention, ruthlessly undermining all attempts to talk about, or even talk about talking about, the future of the regime.

Annual compilation and accounting report for Annex B Parties under the Kyoto Protocol for 2015.

Currently deforestation and forest degradation account for 11 - 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions (see here and here) however, these emissions are not part of the control measures under the Kyoto Protocol.

In a joint statement released by U.S. President Obama and Indian Prime Minister Modi, recognizing, «the need to use the institutions and expertise of the Montreal Protocol to reduce consumption and production of HFCs, while continuing to report and account for the quantities reduced under the UNFCCC», the two countries «pledged to urgently arrange a meeting of their bilateral task force on HFCs prior to the next meeting of the Montreal Protocol to discuss issues such as safety, cost, and commercial access to new or alternative technologies to replace HFCs.»

Here are three good reasons why India and the United States should agree to phase - down production and consumption of HFCs under the Montreal Protocol (while accounting of emissions could remain under the UNFCCC) before the next meeting of parties of the Montreal Protocol in Bangkok this November.

The emissions sources which are included in the calculation: Currently emissions from aviation, shipping and imported consumer goods are not attributed to the country of consumption, under Kyoto protocol accounting.

Eligibility of Annex I Parties to participate in the mechanisms under Articles 6, 12 and 17 Elections - Information on the election and membership of the bodies of the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol Kyoto Protocol Reference Manual on Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amounts FCCC / KP / CMP / 2017/4 Twelfth Annual Report of the Compliance Committee to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol Previous annual reports of the Compliance Committee

«Once emissions and removals from wetlands can be accounted for under the Kyoto Protocol the entire finance stream for wetland management will change», said Susanna Tol of Wetlands International, a group that advocates for protection of wetlands.

Rix LJ (with whom Etherton and Jackson LJJ agreed on this point) indicated that the seemingly unfettered right to access accounts and certain categories of related documents of a local authority that is available to «persons interested» under section 15 must be «read down» — in accordance with Article 1, Protocol 1 of the ECHR (protection of peaceful enjoyment of possessions)-- so as to protect the commercial confidentiality of those documents or parts of those documents, unless disclosure is objectively justified.