Sentences with phrase «under the custody order»

For example, the parent may provide direct support if that parent has some overnights with the child under a custody order.

When one parent has more overnights with a child under a custody order, she is generally entitled to support payments from the other parent.

Further, if the parent ordered to pay support has at least 30 percent of the overnights with the child under a custody order, it is considered a shared custody arrangement and the court has discretion to reduce the obligation to account for any support provided directly by that parent during overnight visitation.

If your income is vastly greater than the other parent's, for instance, or if he was given some overnights with the children under the custody order, a court could use its discretion and choose to reduce the amount of support it orders.

Not exact matches

Under this statute, Chyna could file for a restraining order, and Kardashian could lose a future custody battle over their daughter, Dream.

Under District of Columbia law, custody of any child (ren) of the marriage may be granted jointly or to either parent by court decision (order).

Under Maryland law, custody of any child (ren) of the marriage may be granted jointly or to either parent by court decision (order).

Breech Twins and higher order multiples Previous CS Pre-Eclampsia Placenta praevia Cervical incompetence Previous late stillbirth Previous premature birth Grand multiparty Age under 18 Age over 35 Smoking Drug use Severe mental health issue Epilepsy Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Gestational diabetes Asthma GBS positive Abnormal antibodies Transplant recipient Congenital heart disease Known foetal abnormality Immunosuppressive medication MS Physical disability Intellectual disability Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Previous shoulder dystocia Previous 3rd or 4th degree tear Sickle Cell anaemia BMI under 18 or over 35 at conception Previous massive PPH APH in current pregnancy HIV / AIDS Hepatitis B or C Active TB IUGR Oligohydramnios Polyhydramnios Child previously removed from custody because of abuse Uterine abnormalities such as uterine septum or double uterus Previous uterine surgery for fibroids Chronic renal problems Hypertension Auto immune condition Previous stroke or blod clot Cancer Domestic violence or abusive home Prisoners Homeless women

(borrowed from Dr Kitty) Breech Twins and higher order multiples Previous CS Pre-Eclampsia Placenta praevia Cervical incompetence Previous late stillbirth Previous premature birth Grand multiparty Age under 18 Age over 35 Smoking Drug use Severe mental health issue Epilepsy Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Gestational diabetes Asthma GBS positive Abnormal antibodies Transplant recipient Congenital heart disease Known foetal abnormality Immunosuppressive medication MS Physical disability Intellectual disability Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Previous shoulder dystocia Previous 3rd or 4th degree tear Sickle Cell anaemia BMI under 18 or over 35 at conception Previous massive PPH APH in current pregnancy HIV / AIDS Hepatitis B or C Active TB IUGR Oligohydramnios Polyhydramnios Child previously removed from custody because of abuse Uterine abnormalities such as uterine septum or double uterus Previous uterine surgery for fibroids Chronic renal problems Hypertension Auto immune condition Previous stroke or blod clot Cancer Domestic violence or abusive home Prisoners Homeless women

Here you will find tips on what to do if the other parent doesn't fulfill his or her obligations under your parenting agreement or violates a court order related to custody or visitation.

The office investigates deaths of unarmed people in police custody, under an executive order by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Schneiderman's office is already overseeing its first case under the executive order, involving a Mount Vernon woman who died in police custody.

Except for the stacking of cages without an impervious barrier, a crime could be charged for violations only if the breeder «repeatedly violates» the law «so as to pose a substantial risk to the health and welfare of animals in such person's custody, or knowingly violates an agreed - to remedial order involving the safety and welfare of animals under this section.»

Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation

Section 524 of the Criminal Code sets out that where an accused has been arrested while on interim release for contravening that summons than the judge should cancel the interim release order and detain the accused in custody, unless the accused shows cause why his detention in custody is not justified under Section 515 (10) of the Criminal Code.

Having a second hearing after a guardian has investigated and discovery has been conducted allows the court to determine how accurate the submissions at the initial hearing were and how well the child (ren) are doing under the initial custody order.

The Second Department ruled that, in any event, Ontario's Hague return order meant that Ontario had deferred jurisdiction to New York and that substantial evidence was available in New York so that, even if the six month rule had not been satisfied, a New York court had jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination under Domestic Relations Law Sec. 76.

The parents claimed that s. 32 (6)(a) of the Children and Youth Care Protection Act, which prohibited the addition of conditions in continuous custody orders was contrary to the parents» rights under s. 7 of the...

If the order to remove the pin had not resulted in the attorney actually being led away into custody and her client being left in the courtroom, the incident might have gone under the radar.

[228] In making a custody order under s. 16 (1) of the DA, the court shall not take into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the ability of that person to act as a parent of a child (s. 16 (9)-RRB-.

On the legal custody issue, the Court of Appeals agreed with my client that the family court erred in finding he did not have final decision - making authority under the previous order, finding that the old order «implicitly granted him final decision - making authority by virtue of granting him primary legal custody.»

Additionally, in making a custody order under s. 16 (1), the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact (s. 16 (10)-RRB-.

Some people are under the incorrect assumption that if they file a custody case and are awarded a custody order, they will automatically receive child support.

Even under these circumstances, the judge followed through with his decision to adopt the psychologist's recommendations and ordered the immediate transfer of primary physical custody of the parties» child to Father with reasonable visitation for Mother.

Aliens ordered deported should be placed in ICE custody at the conclusion of proceedings pursuant to 8 CFR 241.4 and held through confinement or under strict monitoring until released due to a removal order being overturned or until removed from the US

Custody and access orders are granted and enforced under the Divorce Act.

Notwithstanding 1987 Wisconsin Act 355, section 73, as affected by 1987 Wisconsin Act 364, the parties may agree to the adjudication of a modification of a legal custody or physical placement order under this section in an action affecting the family that is pending on May 3, 1988.

When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents divorced, separated or living separate, and such children are natives of this State, or have resided five years within its limits, they shall not be removed out of its jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify the same, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise order.

There is a rebuttable presumption that continuing the current allocation of decision making under a legal custody order or continuing the child's physical placement with the parent with whom the child resides for the greater period of time is in the best interest of the child.

The court may modify an order of legal custody or physical placement if, after considering the factors under sub.

Violation of the provisions of this section or a court order under this section may be deemed a change of circumstance under section 452.410, allowing the court to modify the prior custody decree.

If the parent proposing the move or removal has sole legal or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the greater period of time or the parents have substantially equal periods of physical placement with the child, as an alternative to the petition, motion or order to show cause under par.

(a) If an individual who has been awarded custody of a child under this chapter intends to move to a residence: (1) other than a residence specified in the custody order; and

A minor child of divorced parents who is a native of or has resided five years within this commonwealth and over whose custody and maintenance a probate court has jurisdiction shall not, if of suitable age to signify his consent, be removed out of this commonwealth without such consent, or, if under that age, without the consent of both parents, unless the court upon cause shown otherwise orders.

The case involved an application under the Youth Criminal Justice Act for an intensive rehabilitation and custody supervision order.

Family relationships covered by the definition of «family member» in the PAFVA include current and former spouses, adult interdependent partners, others residing (or formerly residing) in intimate relationships, persons who are parents of one or more children, regardless of whether they have ever lived together, persons who reside together where one of them has care and custody over the other under a court order, and generally, those related to each other by blood, marriage, adoption, or adult interdependent relationships, as well as children in the care and custody of the above persons (PAFVA section 1 (1)(d)-RRB-.

Any entitlement to custody or access or incidents of custody under this section is subject to alteration by an order of the court or by separation agreement.»

Prior to this action being filed, the parties appear to have been operating under an informal joint custody arrangement without there being a formal custody order.

Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 2 Comments»

If you are divorced or otherwise under a child custody court order, your ability to move out of state with the children is restricted.

Posted Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments»

Posted Saturday, May 28th, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific 13 Comments»

Posted Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation

Posted Thursday, June 17th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Jurisdiction, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 4 Comments»

Under s. 679 (3) of the Criminal Code, an appellant must satisfy the court that: (i) his appeal is not frivolous; (ii) he will surrender into custody in accordance with the terms of the release order; and (iii) his detention is not necessary in the public interest (para. 8).

In making an order for custody or access under either the Divorce Act (federal legislation, for married parents pursuing a divorce) or the Children's Law Reform Act (Ontario legislation applying to parents who are not married, or who are not pursuing a divorce), the court will consider only the best interests of the child.

Under s. 34 (1) the court may instruct a person, a children's aid society or other body to supervise an order of custody or access.

The court under s. 30 (1) of this Act can order an assessment if it feels that more evidence is needed in order to make a decision about the custody of your child.

(5) Subject to the order, the inspection shall take place under the immediate supervision of a local registrar of the Superior Court of Justice who shall be present during the inspection, and, so long as the ballots or other documents are in the custody of the local registrar and not under inspection, they shall be kept in a secure place under lock and key.

[para. 49] Because of this, the court went on, it is not necessary for a court to order a non-removal clause after making an interim custody order: the fact that the court retains some degree of custody under the Hague Convention, ``... removal of the child is unlawful within the meaning of the Convention...» [para. 50]