A will that is otherwise valid under Ontario law, may not be valid and cause the gift to fail
under the law of the country where the property is located due to non-compliance with local execution or attestation requirements.
Not exact matches
@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge
of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation
under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans
of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's»
of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into
law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles
of Darts, even though our
country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers
of Darts becoming government instead
of staying in the realm
of sport
where it belongs
That is
where the idea
of a «flag
country» is defined
under international
law.
The game takes place in Taiwan in the 1960s, the middle
of a period known as the «White Terror»
where the
country was
under a long period
of Martial
Law, and fear
of Communism and Mainland China led to an era
of brutal government suppression
of the media and suspected Communist Sympathisers.
Recognition and enforcement may be refused
under article V (1)(d) if, «failing» an express or implied agreement between the parties, the composition
of the tribunal or the procedure did not accord with the «
law of the
country where the arbitration took place».
122 State
law allowing issuance
of a ne exeat order
under particular circumstances could also provide a basis for a good problem — for example, whether in the course
of a contested divorce, one parent should be allowed to take the children with her to another
country where the parent has a temporary work posting like a sabbatical or visitorship.
Section 2 (c)
of the Act defines the term «International Commercial Arbitration» and it means an Arbitration relating to disputes arising out
of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial
under the
law in force in Bangladesh and
where at least one
of the parties is: (i) an individual who is a national
of or habitually resident in, any
country other than Bangladesh; or (ii) a body corporate which is incorporated in any
country other than Bangladesh; or (iii) a company or an association or a body
of individuals whose central management and control is exercised in any
country other than Bangladesh, or (iv) the Government
of a foreign
country.
The Supreme Court found that security can only be ordered
where an application for recognition and enforcement
of a foreign arbitral award is being adjourned due to challenges to the award in the courts
of the
country in, or
under the
law of which, it was made.
Where the Minister certifies by notice, published in the Canada Gazette, that any
country that is not a treaty
country grants or has undertaken to grant, either by treaty, convention, agreement or
law, to citizens
of Canada, the benefit
of copyright on substantially the same basis as to its own citizens or copyright protection substantially equal to that conferred by this Act, the
country shall, for the purpose
of the rights conferred by this Act, be treated as if it were a
country to which this Act extends, and the Minister may give a certificate, notwithstanding that the remedies for enforcing the rights, or the restrictions on the importation
of copies
of works,
under the
law of such
country, differ from those in this Act.
In anti-money laundering
law, the concept
of funds or income «lawfully obtained» has always been used and it means income or funds obtained lawfully
under the
laws of the
country from
where the income or funds arise (see for example, the Criminal Finances Act 2017).
The general rule is that Quebec will recognize foreign judgments, but there are several exceptions, including whether the
country where the decision was rendered has jurisdiction
under the provisions
of Quebec
law.
Additionally, if you have been accused
of or convicted
of a crime performed while not residing in the
country where you are accused or have been convicted, then the residence
country may only grant the extradition request if the offense is also a crime
under domestic
law.
The major implications for banks targeted by HMRC will be the administrative burden
of producing the information requested; the risk
of breaching confidentiality
laws in the
countries where the offshore accounts are held — for example
under Swiss and Cayman Islands
law there are criminal sanctions for breaching client confidentiality — and other conflict
of laws issues; and the risk
of Financial Services Authority investigations if it seems that the bank had encouraged the use
of offshore accounts in a misleading way, eg by advertising them as tax - free, or by suggesting that HMRC would never know about the income earned on sums in the accounts.
To provide certainty to businesses, the ACL sets out four situations
where you can safely make a
country of origin claim without it raising concerns
under the
law.
Sexting that involves minors
under the age
of consent sending an explicit photograph
of themselves to a romantic partner
of the same age can be illegal in
countries where anti-child pornography
laws require all participants in pornographic media to be over the age
of majority.
Werner v. Katal
Country Club (234 A.D. 2d 659)- broker may recover a commission in the absence
of being the procuring cause in a transaction
where the seller terminates the broker's activities in bad faith and as a mere device to escape the payment
of the commission; triable issue
of fact exists as to seller's bad faith
where seller engaged in direct negotiations with buyer and withdrew proposed contract indicating broker was the procuring cause and inserting himself as procuring cause after broker refused to reduce his commission; cause
of action against attorney
under Judiciary
Law § 487 (1).