Sentences with phrase «under the question on»

The defence have come under question on several occasions so far this season, and with Kompany injuried and Mangala on loan, it'll have to be much more of the same.

In Texas, the Texas Association of REALTORS ® has updated its Sellers» Disclosure Notice to include mold under the question on environmental hazards.

Not exact matches

Mattel argued that these items are toys, and should enter the country tariff - free under tariff item 9503.00.90... To help answer the question, the CBSA brought in Dr. Christopher Fennell, Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa, for his expert opinion on infant cognitive development.

Many observers, though, balked at the $ 710 million cost of the acquisitions, questioning whether Under Armour could quickly produce any return on investment — two of the three companies were unprofitable — let alone succeed in a space that shares little with making shirts and shoes.

On Tuesday, while under questioning by MPs, Silvester maintained his company did contract work for Cambridge Analytica's parent company SCL, but that it had never been part of either firm.

Now on the left hand side click the «Questions» link (under «By Type»), and you should see a list of questions about yourQuestions» link (under «By Type»), and you should see a list of questions about yourquestions about your keyword.

Microsoft had been doing a decent job of keeping its new operating system under wraps until this morning, when its Chinese division posted a question to users on the Chinese social networking site Webio.com.

The campaign returned this year on Canadian stations during the Super Bowl under the modified moniker «Our Chicken, Your Questions.»

The case hinges on questions of who owns a piece of data and the circumstances under which the information can be viewed as residing in the public domain, accessible by all and sundry.

President Donald Trump's tax reform plan came under new criticism on Tuesday from two towering Wall Street figures, including billionaire investor Warren Buffett, who called into question a Republican drive to slash the U.S. corporate rate.

The question is whether Spiegel will stick to his under - the - radar image or address investors head - on.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Thursday called into question the need for regulatory relief for small institutions, noting that they have continued to be profitable despite new rules under the Dodd - Frank Act.

Zuckerberg said on Wednesday under questioning by U.S. Representative Ben Luján that, for security reasons, Facebook also collects «data of people who have not signed up for Facebook.»

Timothy D. Cook, Apple's chief executive, is expected to come under sharp questioning at a Congressional hearing on Tuesday.

The correct fiduciary decision - making process for selecting an investment under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, is to investigate the particular investment in question so as to fully understand it and, based on the facts gathered, make a rationale decision as to whether it fits the role prescribed for it in the plan's investment portfolio.

Unlike agents within the company's advisor network, independent agents who choose to sell Principal's products aren't under any contractual obligation to do so and questions remain on whom the fiduciary obligation falls: the insurance company or the distributor?

Depending on the element in question, the need for new development is needed to keep prices under control, or even necessary to prevent shortages.

According to [redacted], the agenda comprised questions on how deniable cash payments were to be made to hackers who had worked in Europe under Kremlin direction against the CLINTON campaign and various contingencies for covering up these operations and Moscow's secret liaison with the TRUMP team more generally.

DOL notes that like the FAQs issued on Oct. 27 on the Prohibited Transaction Exemptions, the FAQ for advisors focuses particularly on specific technical questions raised by financial service providers, and it is limited to investment advice concerning plans covered under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, IRAs and other plans covered by Section 4975 (e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.

On the second day of deliberations, the jury asked what «fraudulent intent» meant, and asked clarifying questions about the definition and scope of assets under management.

The program size analysis generally focus on two questions: Does the company already have a sufficient number of shares available under its existing plans?

By suing, she potentially has the power to require Donald «grab» em by the pussy» Trump to answer questions about his sexual conduct under oath, whether he committed campaign finance violations, and to focus attention on whether Trump has used non-disclosure agreements to cover - up his sexual conduct.

However, under questioning from journalists on this matter, Zuckerberg stated: «I don't think there's been any meaningful impact that we've observed, but it's not good — I don't want anyone to be unhappy with our services.»

On October 29, 2009, under questioning in the legislature, the B.C. Liberal government was forced to admit that the full bill for the B.C. Place roof project would be $ 563 million, including the retractable roof, the revitalization and the refurbishment and the maintenance costs.

Looks like they'd question why the Repubs did not deliver on one of these issues in 6 years of absolute control in DC under Bush.

On the question of fascism, however, the facts of Gadamer's career under the Nazis (covered by a quarter of the book) do not lead us to any dramatic or even noteworthy conclusions.

In Lucia v. SEC, the argument centered on the question of whether administrative judges are wielding the power to settle cases decisively and issue orders, even though they are not appointed and confirmed as judges according to the form prescribed under Article III of the Constitution.

No, Martin's questions would not be these things that we still hang on to finding ourselves engulf in complacency because doing nothing is far more easier than doing something desirable; rather wanting to be under achievers.

All of the matters mentioned thus far bear on the central question of ethics: Is it «right» for a Christian, under any circumstance, to take her or his own life?

This conflict, focused primarily on the question of whether and under what conditions the civilly divorced and remarried may be admitted to communion, grew fiercer in 2017.

He questioned the introduction of communion «under both species» on the grounds that it would necessarily require lay people to perform functions which were not properly theirs.

Then some guy named Alex pops on under the name AnImpartialOberserver, Alex, Alex the Inept I am not sure, asks some very good questions... but gets shot down.

Of course if anyone looks up, «No man knows my history» by Fawn M. Brodie, or «Under The Banner of Heaven, or Secret Ceremonies: A Mormon Woman's Intimate Diary of Marriage and Beyond,» as well as google different questions about mormon secret names, White Horse Prophesy, Mormons becoming Gods, God was once a man on another planet, mormon bigotry against Blacks, Joseph Smith and his 14 year old wife (WHILE he was still married to his living wife Emma) Helen Mar Kimball... I could go on.

They are called «nones» because they check «none» under a religion question on a survey.

«Yesterday, Bryce Harper was wearing «That's a clown question, bro» T - shirt under his warm ups,» Johnson reported on Friday.

Broken election promises, a theodicy question, and a reflection on Christian ministry under Trump.

I bet your defenses will crumble under questioning and you will fall back on the same tired arguments that all christians seem to use when cornered.

The question is how and under what circumstances — on what theological premises.

At Jerusalem itself the continued presence of the majority of the apostles simplified the question of authority, because they seem to have acted on all important questions as a body which sought and obtained the consent of the Church as a whole (Acts 6: 12 - 16, 15:22) under the joint guidance of the Spirit (Acts 15:28, cf. 6:3).

Question is PREACHER UNDER ATTACK OR JUST BEING EXPOSED... as discussed on internet radio show Center Stage last year... This show was 100 % accurate.

What we are finding is a lot of people feel that religion is under attack, when in most cases (not all, most) it is that they are being questioned and challenged on what they say, and they are not used to or comfortable with that.

The decision on Friday will open marriage legally in the remaining fourteen states, and will give new legal protection for those who got married under court rulings that actually could not be considered truly final until the Supreme Court itself had decided the constitutional question.

On the other hand, if one can bracket the cosmogonical question, the reference beyond the God - world system, and focus upon the journey within the system toward «the maximum attainment of intensity compatible with harmony that is possible under the circumstances of the actual situation» (PS 18:116), then perhaps one will find that the biblical images and the process - relational concepts are richly mutually illuminating after all.

The question is being answered and soon God will end this wicked system of things and bring back under his rule, anyone not on God's side will be destroyed.

instead of blaming religion we should stop being blind followers and start doing our part, namely that what God told us to do, to read for ourselves, to question what is being taught under prayer and based on knowledge of the Bible, knowing that If He really is God, and the Bible is His word, it can not contradict, and if it seems to do so, then maybe i should question my understanding of it before questioning Him!

Even as they complained about his leadership, Cox was off into new territories, raising respectful questions about the necessary role of play, ritual, and imagination, questions about the undeniable strength of the popular devotions of stubborn peasants — in Latin America under the traditional power of the landlords, and among the shipbuilders and electricians of Poland, who had the foot of communism on their necks.

Those loopholes may not be quite as large as Naumer suggests, however The bill — which focuses on tribes and not individuals or «almost any Indian» — requires that a tribe establish that an object or objects in question originated with it and come under one of the three categories — sacred object, funerary object, human remains.

Because Nietzsche's thought was appropriated by Hitler and Nazism (however legitimately or illegitimately the Nazis understood that self - contradictory philosopher — and the jury is forever out on that question), Nietzsche came under a cloud in Germany immediately after World War II.

But my point here is that unsatisfactory economic ideas and practices which have an impressive history of failure, which caused to founder that great nation California, which lie at the root of much of the shame and dread and division and hostility and cynicism with which our society is presently afflicted, are treated as immutable truths, not to be questioned, not to be interfered with, lest they unleash their terrible retribution, recoiling against whomever would lay a hand on the Ark of Market Economics, if that is the name under which this mighty power is currently invoked.

I want to spend the next few minutes thinking about these two questions, and to guide our thoughts in doing so I want to focus on those great words written by Paul, or someone under his influence... I Timothy 3:15... «the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth.»