Sentences with phrase «under things so»

These little guys love to burrow under things so get a cage or an aquarium that is tall that allows them to behave more as though they're in their natural habitat.

Now that I know these tissue turtlenecks go under things so well, I'm going to start wearing them more and more.

Not exact matches

«From our standpoint, instead of having a patchwork of local governments trying to figure out how to legally classify these things, the bill just creates this baseline framework so no matter where you're at in California, these scooters will be classified for legal reasons under the same category,» Gray said.

The pause is so valuable because it allows you to get your emotions under control and think things through before you say or do something that you'll regret.

But anyway, so we talked a lot about whales and we said, «When you go whale watching and a whale breaches, a whale jumps up above the water, everybody oohs and aahs and takes pictures of it and talks about «Oh, look at the whale,» and then the whale goes back under water for like 45 minutes, and it's the most boring thing in the world.

Many things under way at Other Lab relate to a DARPA project on programmable matter (DARPA being the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the famous federal government research laboratory in which far - fetched ideas are pursued until they become not - so - far - fetched.

Despite a long line - up of popular shows like Narcos and Stranger Things, Netflix the company has been under some pressure — and so has its share price — primarily because of fears about what the future might hold.

«I loved to get them a lot of things to put under the tree at Christmas, because it was just so much darn fun to watch them when they were little, opening the gifts and enjoying them,» said Davis, who lives in Mesa, Ariz..

Things change so fast online that a marketer's skills can become entirely obsolete in under a year.

And a march to get the entire country to unite under one cause — it is the ultimate show of prominence and support and just rage toward the things that have been happening in our country for so long.

As history teaches us, it is one thing to deceive the press and quite another to do so under oath.

Even though algorithms decide so much of a citizen's life — what ads a person sees, what political messages they hear, what kinds of loans they can get, how they fair in the criminal justice system — these things are all under the sway of algorithms, and most consumers don't feel empowered to push back because they don't know the math.

However much time they have — and in my opinion they are unlikely to have much more than 2 - 3 years in which to get credit growth under control, but there is no science to this so I can not know for sure — as Beijing moves forward in its struggle to rebalance the Chinese economy, we should keep three things in mind:

«I could see that there were many things I could do that would be valuable for the organization — cash flow projections, budgets under different scenarios, sensitivity analysis — but time is always at a premium so I ended up spending my time on the must - do things like annual reports and AGLC audits.

«It was a big momentum deal, so when the bottom comes out from under it, you have to go back to the well and start the whole thing,» he says.

If you're not good with numbers, hire an accounting firm to keep track of things for you, so that you can show investors that you've got everything under control.

And you may vote a certain way or not but that doesn't matter, you've got 27,000 employees and I think the fact is that you're operating under a Federal Trade Commission consent decree from 2011, that's a real thing and it goes for twenty years so when someone said «do we need more regulations, do we need more legislation?»

So, if you're interested in collecting things and continuing to keep your home lovely at the same time, try turning the collections into passive income by selling some of the things you find (especially the ones that are being sold under their value, and you would know, because you are paying attention).

«A march to get the entire country to unite under one cause — it is the ultimate show of prominence and support and just rage toward the things that have been happening in our country for so long,» Delaney Tarr, a 17 - year - old senior at Stoneman Douglas, told Vox last month.

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

Shamgar, is your claim that, if the church was under greater persecution, we would all agree about these things because the people holding to one side of each of these debates aren't true believers, and so they would leave under persecution?

They have, during the DNC, the issue specifically here is that Mormonism is still relatively unknown so the AA is a chance to educate people on the insidious things the mormon church stands for but tries to brush under the rug.

your claim of «they change the definition» tries to under - cut the argument itself «at the knees» so to speak... but let me remind you that you changed your self - definition from drunk and unsaved to «drunk with the new wine» and saved (get the Acts reference, i'm kinda proud of that one; — RRB --RRB- things change and when we know better we do better.

So do your religious thing but when they start telling you what religion you will be allowed to worship under or what school you can send your kids to then or what perscription you can take.

So I have [this song saying], «You are not possessive, You are not invasive, You are not controlling» All these things that I've kind of been taught that God was, and I no longer believe that God is, so I was trying to chip away at the block of marble and see, like, what is under herSo I have [this song saying], «You are not possessive, You are not invasive, You are not controlling» All these things that I've kind of been taught that God was, and I no longer believe that God is, so I was trying to chip away at the block of marble and see, like, what is under herso I was trying to chip away at the block of marble and see, like, what is under here?

You have only to look at the things that have happened and continue to happen under communism to see that an atheist state is not so very desirable.

And even that is under debate in my head and in our community because I somehow believe that this «Jesus» so embraces a universal comprehension of all things and all people, with no one excluded because of race, religion, sex or politic, that Jesus implodes to the point of disappearing, or, becoming the all in all.

Some of us, in a not so dim and distant past fell under the spell of such psuedo - magisterial systems and supposed them to be true and accurate in all things.

Quantity under given dimensions is also what extends a thing in space so as to make one part of that thing separate from the other parts.

The thing that's so insidious is that this «poisons the well» on another person by innuendo or outright labeling, especially if someone's behavior under stress * seems * to support the conclusion pronounced against them.

For this reason the legend must be told in such a way that two things are apparent: how the saint was so holy that he controlled his surroundings; and how his life, from infancy, was under divine guidance and protection and hence was lifted out, by God Himself, from the mass of human misfortune.

He said: «The roof leaks, so my office under one of the corners gets flooded whenever it rains very hard and some of the stone work is coming off the outside of the building, so just things that need fixing.»

I loved the premise, the strain of darkness under the jokes, Titus has my heart forever, and Kimmy, well, she is just so believable, so earnest, so real even though the whole thing is utterly unreal.

Both seem to have imbibed the Enlightenment's desacralizing tendencies so thoroughly that any notion that God «imparts spiritual things under visible ones» (Calvin) scandalizes them.

due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.

This is, of course, no more than we should expect, if we take the New Testament's Paschal triumphalism to heart: «Now is the judgment of this world, now will the prince of this world be cast out» (John 12:31); «I have overcome the world» (John 16:33); he is «far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion» and all things are put «under his feet» (Ephesians 1:21 - 2); «having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it» (Colossians 2:15); «he led captivity captive» (Ephesians 4:8); and so on.

Also, exploration of how best to characterize particular Christian congregations» construals of the Christian thing will have to rest in part on the results of exploration of whether their practices involve truth claims and, if so, whether they are true and under what circumstances.

But let's not operate under false pretensions: David says lots of things about God on this blog, and so do we all in the comments section.

The thing is you can't put this under a glass and when you get a chance to see it, you can't come back and tell everyone of your non-believing friends «it real so believe».

After all, under the capacious canopy of the papal office, so many disparate things find common shelter.

So then everyone of us shall give account of himself to God... Phil.2: 9 - 11 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him and given him a name which is above every name That at the name of Jesus every knee shall bow of things in heaven and things in earth and things under the earth And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father.

So God took every created thing, and placed it under Christ.

Se» x is not criminal behavior, so it doesn't fall under the umbrella of such things as assassin - for - hire, etc..

Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.

The «give me everything free so I can sit on my lazy butt» generation needs to learn a few things from immigrants who suffered under Marxist dictatorships.

In arguing with atheists online - probably not the smartest thing to do, I'll admit it, BUT - I do feel duty bound to fall on the sword with someone like Richard Dawkins - on ocassion, because they rend such a huge YouTube'ism under their so called scientific opinions.

And, the more we try to control the more likely we are to live in complete rebellion to the one who is in control, who has all things in His hands and who constantly calls us to surrender to Him so that we can experience the joy of living under HIS Sovereignty rather than having to constantly discover that we have none of our own!

I go on the internet on occasion and read things that come up under the search «evidence for God», not because I need some, but because so many on here say, «show us the evidence and we will believe.»

One thing is clear, the President had learned something from his Philadelphia speech on race last spring, when he made the error, as some so infelicitously out it, of throwing his own grandmother «under the bus.»

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.