18 is explicitly invoked as the boundary age in Article 1 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, so it is binding to a large number of signatory countries all over the globe
under treaty law.
Not exact matches
The web site and all the content contained therein are, among other things, protected as a collective work or compilation
under applicable U.S.
law and other
laws and
treaties.
This Constitution, and the
Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all
Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
This Constitution, and the
laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all
treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or
laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
Under the Constitution, a
treaty, like a Federal statute, is part of the «supreme
Law of the Land.»
The Geneva Convention allows them to be «detained or prosecuted
under the domestic
law of the detaining state for such action; subject of course to international
treaties on justice and human rights such as everyone's right to a fair trial.»
they can also litigate it: internal
laws generally favor countries who signed unfair
treaties under duress.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in
Law and Equity, arising
under this Constitution, the
Laws of the United States, and
Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between a State and Citizens of another State; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands
under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
«If the government had proposed a
treaty change to include the charter of fundamental rights into British
law, that would have triggered a referendum
under the EU bill.
The agreement for the most part does not obligate the United States
under international
law — though it does include some procedural components that are legally binding and that the administration says are supported by prior
treaties.
The current debate about the
treaty's stability began in October 2007 when the U.K. announced that it would file a claim
under the
Law of the Sea extending the seabed boundaries of their Antarctic territory based on the extent of the continental shelf.
Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited
under the
laws of australia and by international
treaty.
These
treaties establish both minimum standards for protecting works
under domestic
law and for extending protection to the works of other
treaty members
under the principle of national treatment.
This site is protected
under both U.S. Federal copyright
law and international
treaties.
The new arrangement means Canadian banks would report «relevant» information on accounts held by U.S. residents or citizens to the Canada Revenue Agency, which would share it with the IRS
under existing tax
treaty rules — making it consistent with Canadian privacy
laws, said senior government officials.
Except as otherwise indicated, our Websites and Content, and all rights thereto, are the property of AWP USA Inc. and / or our affiliated companies and are protected
under U.S. copyright, trade secret, trademark and patent
law as well as international
treaty provisions, with all rights reserved.
We retain all rights not expressly granted, and nothing in these Terms of Use constitutes a waiver of any rights
under copyright or other intellectual property
laws or any other federal, provincial or local
law, regulation, ordinance or
treaty.
Nothing in these Terms constitutes a waiver of any rights
under copyright
laws, trademark
laws or any other federal, state or local
law, regulation, ordinance or
treaty or a waiver of moral rights.
Kabounce and Stitch Heads and the Kabounce and Stitch Heads logos are trademarks of Stitch Heads V.o.F. protected
under international
laws and
treaties.
This website is
under the copyright protection of the Intellectual Property
Laws of the State of New York, the United States and International
Treaties.
Under certain provisions of the
Law of the Sea
treaty, countries can extend claims to seabed resources beyond the standard 200 nautical mile limit if they can make a case that such features are a natural prolongation of the sloping edge of the shelf.
A proposal for bringing international environmental
law under one legally binding
treaty at the United Nations will be up for a preliminary vote later this week at the U.N. General Assembly.
Ratified
treaties are
law under the Constitution.
The State Department's legal theory is that international agreements lacking new and material legal obligations are not
treaties under United States
law, and therefore need not undergo the Senate's advice and consent process.
But if the error had been retained, the U.S. might have been bound by the manacles of international
law into something important enough to be considered a
treaty under the U.S. Constitution.
Instead of serving up an all - encompassing formal
treaty that requires ratification of a certain mix of countries to take effect
under international
law, an agreement's legal force on emissions could stem from domestic
laws countries pass to implement the emission - control efforts they pledge.
CG and RG, COP21Paris is not a
treaty under US
law.
The standard way to employ sanctions
under current international
law is to put tariffs on the imports from countries that are not complying with a
treaty's provisions.
However, the
treaties must be implemented in the
laws of individual countries if they are to have an effect «The diversity of plant varieties is
under threat.
Dismissing the Paris
treaty as a paper tiger because its emission reduction and funding commitments are not «binding»
under international
law is whistling past the graveyard.
Details vary by jurisdiction but, in general, a
treaty negotiated by the executive branch would usually require ratification by the legislature to give it effect
under domestic
law.
When considering a special meaning of the expression «waters falling within the sovereignty» of Morocco as including Western Saharan waters, the Court pointed out that agreeing to such a special meaning would be contrary to the EU's obligations
under international
law, ie self - determination and the relative effect of
treaties, stopping short of reprimanding the EU for potentially recognising Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara (Judgment paras 63, 71).
Canada is a party to the ICESPR and thus has obligations
under international
law to fulfill the commitments made
under that
treaty.
The treatment of dual citizens
under the EO either is contrary to statutory immigration
law or to a
treaty or to the U.S. Constitution and customary international
law.
The ESM
Treaty is a
treaty under public international
law concluded by the members of the eurozone to create a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the stability of the euro area.
This week, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear five appeals including a number of significant cases that will determine the rights of the Crown to «take up» Aboriginal lands
under treaty; the right of public - sector workers in Saskatchewan to strike; and the extent of solicitor - client privilege as it pertains to money laundering
laws.
Generally speaking,
treaty obligations stand on equal footing
under international
law.
In its judgment, the SCC explained that even though EU
law is not itself part of the constitutional canon, «both international
treaties and agreements, including European secondary legislation, may provide valuable interpretative criteria of the meaning and scope of the rights and freedoms that the Constitution recognises,» taking into account the interpretive decisions rendered «by the bodies of guarantee established
under those same international
treaties and agreements.»
The fact that the EUSFTA does not explicitly allow for cross-suspension (for instance, suspending the reduced tariff rates for certain categories of imported goods in the event of a breach of one of the environmental provisions), did not deter the Court from finding that a breach of Chapter 13 could constitute a material breach of the
Treaty and therefore authorising the Parties to suspend the agreement
under international
treaty law.
That the bill presents a case for judicial consideration arising
under the
laws of the United States and
treaties made
under their authority with the Cherokee Nation, and which
laws and
treaties have been, and are threatened to be still further, violated by the
laws of the State of Georgia referred to in this opinion.
In Chirac v. Chirac, this Court declared that it was unnecessary to inquire into the effect of the
treaty with France in 1778
under the old confederation, because the confederation had yielded to our present Constitution, and this
treaty had been the supreme
law of the land.
One of our suggestions was that looking at the enforcement of and compliance with decisions rendered
under international investment
treaties could prove a useful means of measuring progress on the rule of
law, since the way countries deal with their disputes provides evidence of accountability.
The Court's reference (Tsilhqot» in at para 136) to R v Marshall, [1999] 3 SCR 533 as support for the proposition that interjurisdictional immunity does not apply where provincial legislation conflicts with
treaty rights is also puzzling, as the applicability of provincial
law was not at issue in that case — Marshall involved a prosecution
under federal legislation, the Fisheries Act.
The constitutional
law, then, is that North America is
under indigenous sovereignty pending
treaty of relinquishment.
It is not through the invocation of a substantive electoral right contained in the
Treaties that Member States are restricting that the issue falls within Union
law — rather it is an implicit obligation contained in Article 14 (3) TEU as reflected in the 1976 Act that elections be universal and direct; it is a general obligation placed on Member States to ensure the democratic integrity of EP elections that catches electoral
law and subjects it to review
under the Charter.
Should a Member States «court of last instance nonetheless submit a question within the scope of EU
law to the ECtHR without being entitled to do so
under the acte - clair - doctrine, proceedings for infringement of the
Treaties could be engaged against that Member State based on Art. 258 f. TFEU.
This Constitution, and the
laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all
treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
law of the land; and the judges and other public officials in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or
laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
The large commercial software company states the following on their copyright and trademarks page «This work is protected
under United States copyright
law and other international copyright
treaties and conventions.»
Regarding the missing termination clauses in both
treaties, the rather general reference to the clausula rebus sic stantibus of Art. 62 VCLT by the court is rather disappointing, in particular knowing how difficult it is to argue a change of circumstances
under public international
law.
Notably, the Court itself has hardly ever given much weight to the wording of the
Treaties in developing the prohibition of restrictions
under the freedom of establishment in its case
law.