Sentences with phrase «under your copyrights then»

All Pictures have been taken from different sources, If any Graphic / Image is offensive or under your Copyrights then please E-mail us via contact page to get it removed.

Not exact matches

Then, Sony was the maker of the Betamax recorder and Universal City Studios and Walt Disney Productions were arguing for protection under copyright law.

Then in italics under that in 12 point put «Copyright 2010 by (Author name)» You can put your publisher name under that if you want, but do not say the copyright is by the pCopyright 2010 by (Author name)» You can put your publisher name under that if you want, but do not say the copyright is by the pcopyright is by the publisher.

If you notify us through the procedure we provide on A&A Printing sites for making claims of copyright infringement that a third party has made a Printed Books & Digital Books available for distribution through the Program (or for distribution in a particular territory through the Program) that you have the exclusive right to make available under the Program, then, upon your request and after verification of your claim, we will pay you the Royalties due in connection with any sales of the Printed Books & Digital Books through the Program, and will remove the Printed Books & Digital Books from future sale through the Program, as your sole and exclusive remedy.

Then you can choose whether to list the copyright under both or just one of those.

Some contracts now define «in print» as being related to a certain amount of revenue per year rather than just availability from the publisher: «that if the book goes out of print then the copyright does go back to the author immediately under the current system.»

If such a crowd are not all «users of the service» and in fact you, the restaurant proprietor, are the only true user, as the interactive operator of the computer, then you would be performing public display for the benefit of your patrons, which is a right under copyright that has not been licensed to you.

My linked example — the guy wrote the code, then he founded the company, and instead of replacing his name with the company name in the copyright statement, it appears that the company name was simply placed under a separate (additional) copyright statement in each file.

Is this protected under fair use, and if it is then why could someone not copy a copyrighted anime and change only the story under fair use?

If you sign over the copyright of a piece of code, then under US copyright law you have essentially lost any authority over the code and any inherent right to use it.

The take - down provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is under attack on two fronts, both involving videos posted to and then removed from YouTube.

At such time, CSI will then apply, on behalf of the label, for a licence from the Copyright Board of Canada under Section 77 of the Canadian Copyright Act.

Under the Thai law then, registration of copyright materials was not available.

Then, consistent with the charge to award fees under section 505 as necessary to vindicate copyright rights, the district judge then sliced 50 % from the remaining amoThen, consistent with the charge to award fees under section 505 as necessary to vindicate copyright rights, the district judge then sliced 50 % from the remaining amothen sliced 50 % from the remaining amount.

The BC Laws website claims that copyright in the «electronic version» of the laws specifically is owned by the Queen's Printer, and then states that «All statutes and regulations are under copyright by the Province of British Columbia.»

If any elements of the game are protected by copyright, then you can not reproduce those elements (17 U.S.C. § 106) unless your reproduction falls under a fair use exception (17 U.S.C. § 107).

The person submitting the DMCA takedown must state which work they believe has been infringed upon, and then they have to state under threat of perjury that they are the copyright owner or represent the copyright owner.

It would of course change the facts: If the courts were to make pleadings available electronically, then I think the analysis to be undertaken would be very similar to that of CCH v. LSUC and that there be a relatively good basis for arguing that courts fall within the definition of a «library» under the Copyright Act and therefore take advantage of the exceptions applicable to same.

For example, if a website based in the US is viewed in Japan, then a copyright claim could be filed under Japanese law in a Japanese court.