If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if management's
underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by a forward - looking statement.
If
underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward - looking statements.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may vary materially from those described as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or planned.
If
underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward - looking statements.
If one or more of these risks materialize, or if
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected.
Not exact matches
Yet their conclusions, in most cases, will rest precariously on
assumptions and guesses about
underlying Party mechanics and motivations that can neither be
proved nor disproved.
The reason this has
proved to be such a problem in process thought has less to do with the peculiar nature of Whitehead's concept of God than with an
underlying assumption about prehension.
My
underlying assumption is that all is normal and will remain so until
proven otherwise.
To the extent that demographers talk about the
assumptions underlying the UN medium variant, which now shows world population reaching 9 billion, by 2042, there's a growing consensus that the
assumptions may
prove too optimistic (i.e. population may grow more rapidly than projected).
An
assumption underlying your paper seems to me to be that the case for CAGW is
proven.
A number of other
underlying assumptions in this process have also
proven faulty.
The exposed population could grow by 3 million between 2000 and 2030 and an additional 1.2 million by 2060 to reach 32.4 million under scenario D. Scenario D
proved to be the highest - end - of - growth scenario for «richer economies», which is due to the
underlying assumptions made in the scenarios (see Table 1).
The IPCC then attempts to assert their models are robust and that therefore
proves the CO2 hypothesis however, an objective look at the models would say that it seems unbelievable the models are robust on the face of them considering the computational complexity and errors in the numerical processes as well as the number of
assumptions in the
underlying formulas.
If those predictions
prove accurate, the models — and more importantly, their
underlying assumptions — become more credible.
· The weight the trier of fact ultimately places on the opinion of the expert may depend on the degree to which the
underlying assumptions have been
proven by other admissible evidence.