What's more, rescinding the plan does nothing to address its
underlying basis: the 2009 EPA
Endangerment Finding that requires the agency to take action under the Clean Air Act to curb emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Despite Boyce's insistence that the science be «left to the scientists,» Peabody Energy has attempted to do exactly the opposite, asking that EPA reconsider the
Endangerment Finding based on its judgment that the e-mails exposed serious flaws in the
underlying science.