Sentences with phrase «underlying science of climate change»

The Trump administration's proposal to repeal the Clean Power Plan is based on flawed analysis that understates the plan's benefits, part of this administration's unfortunate pattern of dismantling sensible policies and rejecting the underlying science of climate change.

When discussing various observers» attitudes towards some body of objective data, such as the data underlying the science of climate change, those who evaluate the data without undue ideological bias might better be described as «impartial» rather than as «objective».

That neither the stolen correspondence nor the minor IPCC errors undermine the underlying science of climate change hasn't checked the onslaught.

In his speech, Kerry noted that the president «has repeatedly questioned the underlying science of climate change and attempted to reignite the debate over whether the threat is real.»

Not exact matches

Trump has already nominated a handful of people to fill these slots, including former Governor of Texas Rick Perry, who has questioned the science underlying climate change, as energy secretary.

Trump has questioned the science underlying climate change — at one point suggesting that it was a Chinese hoax — and pledged to pull the United States out of the Paris climate agreement.

Jarraud rejected climate sceptics» arguments that the science underlying predictions of man - made climate change was flawed.

Other researchers disagree with the friendly tone of many of the Trump letters, given the president - elect's policy positions — which include questioning the science underlying climate change and proposing to build a wall along the US border with Mexico.

A new study led by Susan Solomon, a federal climate scientist and co-leader of the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessonclimate scientist and co-leader of the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessonClimate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessons, too.

Rather than focussing on the important but inherently incremental developments in the science behind the issue, the media would do us all a favor by maintaining a consistent message regarding the underlying issue (i.e. human action is causing climate change, and climate change has the potential to do great harm to our way of life) and focus on how ordinary people can take steps in their own lives to help address the problem in ways that don't require inordinate sacrifice.

I've had a number of requests from friends / collegues for some «popular» reading on climate change where the underlying science is good, but something a bit lighter than TAR Summary for policymakers.

the ACS has on its website a Climate Science Tool Kit (http://www.acs.org/climatescience) that provides a broader, in - depth view of the underlying science of how human activity can bring about climate Climate Science Tool Kit (http://www.acs.org/climatescience) that provides a broader, in - depth view of the underlying science of how human activity can bring about climate Science Tool Kit (http://www.acs.org/climatescience) that provides a broader, in - depth view of the underlying science of how human activity can bring about climate science of how human activity can bring about climate climate change.

Dana, I think you are pushing in the right direction with this; heat content is a much more direct measure of the underlying changes to the climate system than average air temperatures and climate science communicators should make heat content their first response to the suggestion that global warming is something that waxes and (allegedly, recently) wanes.

Re: «Once the UNFCCC treaty was a done deal,» The fatal flaw underlying today's orthodox IPCC «climate science» is the UNFCCC equivocation by redefining «climate change» from the historic scientific definition of a «change in climate» to:

Roger Pielke Jr., professor in the Environmental Studies Program at the University of Colorado, takes a close look at the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the underlying scientific research, and the data to give you the latest science on disasters and climate Climate Change, the underlying scientific research, and the data to give you the latest science on disasters and climate cChange, the underlying scientific research, and the data to give you the latest science on disasters and climate climate changechange.

It was the concern about this linkage that seemed to underlie much of what I perceived to be the Administration's intervention in managing communications by the Climate Change Science Program.

One of the most influential groups in attacking the science, economics and diplomatic foundations underlying the climate crisis is: The Global Climate Coalition — the main lobbying arm of the oil, automotive and heavy manufacturing sectors in the arena of climate climate crisis is: The Global Climate Coalition — the main lobbying arm of the oil, automotive and heavy manufacturing sectors in the arena of climate Climate Coalition — the main lobbying arm of the oil, automotive and heavy manufacturing sectors in the arena of climate climate change.

More pointedly, the UCS report discusses a case, originally reported in The New York Times, in which the White House allegedly force - edited an Environmental Protection Agency draft report's treatment of climate change, distorting the underlying science in the process.

The overriding theme of what came into clearer focus as a result of «climategate» is that disagreements about climate change are not so much about the science, but rather about a clash of underlying values, ideas (e.g. related to risk perception) and ideals.

to that level, it might turn out to be the case that the Heartland documents supply evidence that Heartland is, in fact, engaged in coordinated attempts to discredit legitimate science and mislead both the public and decision makers about the underlying scientific facts of human - caused climate change.

«But much of the underlying science was correct, and there would be significant changes to climate it if did undergo a catastrophic collapse — although the film made those effects much more catastrophic, and happening much more quickly — than would actually be the case.»

Now, the case for replacing the bulk of the existing subsidies and regulations addressing greenhouse gas emissions with a carbon tax — our preferred policy response to climate change — is quite strong regardless of how one feels about the underlying science.

Needless to say this has been deeply disturbing to an «ordinary Joe» (with 5 grandchildren) who has made an effort to understand the science and the politics that underlie the climate change «debate», especially since my country has become such an important player in the fossil fuel business with its tarsands and pipeline industries that affect us all, so I've tried to find out more about Judith Curry's recent contributions to the debate, not so much the hair - splitting, angels on the head of a pin, esoteric dissections of graphs and stats that I see here on your website but the ethical stance that you take on the larger issue of «killing» the IPCC and all it represents.

Gadget Guy: -LSB-...] And none of the problems have been with the actual science that underlies climate change (which is what the Working Group 1 Report is all about).

Contrarians highlight anomalies and unresolved scientific questions while ignoring the strong evidence supporting the underlying science and current projections of climate change.