Sentences with phrase «underlying share in a business»

Not exact matches

We believe that adjusted diluted net income per share, adjusted net income, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating income margin and adjusted EBITDA are useful measures for investors to review, because they provide a consistent measure of the underlying financial results of our ongoing business and, in our management's view, allow for a supplemental comparison against historical results and expectations for future performance.

The profit illusion created by Jarden's corporate strategy has driven shares up over 230 % in the past five years, to the point where the company's underlying business simply can not justify the share price.

What I am interested in is acquiring as much ownership as I can in a broad collection of wonderful businesses; firms that reward me, my husband, and our family with our share of the sales and profits from the underlying productive enterprise.

We believe it is useful to exclude non-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization and share - based compensation expenses, from our Adjusted EBITDA because the amount of such expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations.

If a stock price is somehow chronically low in relation to the fundamentals of the underlying business, buying 100 % of the outstanding shares removes the veil, and closes the gap between price and value.

Below the 20 % ownership figure, however, only our share of dividends paid by the underlying business units is included in our accounting numbers; undistributed earnings of such less - than - 20 % - owned businesses are totally ignored.

«The appended financial statements reflect «accounting» earnings that generally include our proportionate share of earnings from any underlying business in which our ownership is at least 20 %.

Although both categories share the same underlying platform business model, there are very basic differences in how exchange and maker platforms function.

He learned from Ben Graham that the key to successful investing was the purchase of shares in good businesses when market prices were at a large discount from underlying business values.

«The appended financial statements reflect «accounting» earnings that generally include our proportionate share of earnings from any underlying business in which our ownership is at least 20 %.

Below the 20 % ownership figure, however, only our share of dividends paid by the underlying business units is included in our accounting numbers; undistributed earnings of such less - than - 20 % - owned businesses are totally ignored.

Certain capital gains made by Australian companies on the disposal of their shares in foreign companies with underlying active businesses, subject to conditions

Regarding deductibility — my opinion is that investing in shares of a company (or ETF) that won't pay direct dividends, but the underlying business will make income which will be «distributed» in the form of capital gains makes that investment deductible.

While the underlying operations are very diverse (i.e. railroads, utilities, carpet manufacturers, and even Dairy Queen), the businesses tend to share a common characteristic in that almost all maintain leading market share for either their industry or their geography.

This was pretty unexpected... in fact, seeing the shares down (23) % last year was quite the disconnect vs. the underlying business itself, which boasted a huge turnaround in sales & profitability.

I believe these risks can be countered with: a) a greater level of pre / post-acquisition financial disclosure (as in i) above), allowing investors to better evaluate the underlying intrinsic value of an acquisition, and b) paying acquisition consideration in newly issued shares, rather than cash — vendor / employee ownership of EIIB shares would create far better alignment in newly - acquired businesses.

In short, by presenting a detailed case study of a highly specialized court that operates under government auspices, this Article argues that formal state law can outperform informal group norms by satisfying the business needs of close - knit merchants while simultaneously contributing to the shared values that underlie the success of their future transactions.