Not exact matches
To the best
of our knowledge, and based on all evidence that we're aware
of, neither the signers
of the Shanker Institute manifesto, nor leaders in the Obama / Duncan Education Department, advocate a «nationalized curriculum» that would «
undermine control of public
school curriculum and instruction at the
local and state level» and «transfer
control to an elephantine, inside - the - Beltway bureaucracy.»
While most legislators would agree that
local control of public
schools is important, this bill would take all
control over the creation
of charter
schools out
of the hands
of local officials and give it to an unelected state commission — while simultaneously
undermining the financial structure
of traditional
schools which are under
local control.
The CEA lobbyist formally objected, though, declaring the bill would
undermine the state constitution's guarantee
of school board «
local control.»
«The fact that the Orange County
school board has the authority to grant charters without the consent
of local school boards undermines the concept of local control and makes a mockery of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), said AUHSD Board President Annemarie Randle - Trejo.&r
local school boards
undermines the concept
of local control and makes a mockery of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), said AUHSD Board President Annemarie Randle - Trejo.&r
local control and makes a mockery of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), said AUHSD Board President Annemarie Randle - Trejo.
control and makes a mockery
of the
Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), said AUHSD Board President Annemarie Randle - Trejo.&r
Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), said AUHSD Board President Annemarie Randle - Trejo.
Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), said AUHSD Board President Annemarie Randle - Trejo.»
This from the Democratic governor whose «Commissioner's Network» program has
undermined local control, handed public
schools over to the disgraced Jumoke / FUSE charter
school chain in Hartford and Bridgeport and devastated a number
of urban
schools by implementing a «money follows the child» system that has left troubled
schools without the resources they need to even serve the students that have remained in those
schools.
Not only has the Malloy administration
undermined the very people public
schools were created to help, his efforts have cut deep into the fabric
of Connecticut's historic system
of local control.
From the moment Stefan Pryor arrived in Connecticut, the Malloy administration's education policy has been consistently designed to destroy
local control, belittle and demean teachers, reduce parental involvement,
undermine our public
schools and divert scarce public resources to out -
of - state consultants and carpetbagging staff.
Although the three organizations are funded primarily from
local taxpayer funds and are supposed to be advocating for
local public
schools, all three have spent the last three years lobbying for Governor Malloy's restrictive, centralized and top - down Corporate Education Reform Industry agenda... An agenda that
undermines local control of education, seeks to limit the rights
of parents, denigrates teachers and turns Connecticut's public
schools into little more than Common Core testing factories.
Do they stand with Connecticut's students, teachers, parents, public
school advocates and taxpayers or will they continue to turn our public
schools into little more than testing factories and money pits for an industry that is gorging itself on scarce taxpayer funds while
undermining the role
of teachers, parents and the
local control of public education.
Plaintiffs alleged in their lawsuit that HB7069 took away some
of the constitutional powers to make decisions about public
schools and
undermined local control of public
schools.