Sentences with phrase «undermine public confidence in the judiciary»

Sensationalist and ill - informed attacks can undermine public confidence in the judiciary, but our public can have every confidence in our judiciary, a confidence which I believe must be shared by the Executive.»

And Bashman also terms the panel's view that Allen «undermined public confidence in the judiciary» as absurd.

[3] Conduct that compromises or appears to compromise the independence, integrity, and impartiality of a judge undermines public confidence in the judiciary.

Judges should not accept governmental appointments that could interfere with the effectiveness and independence of the judiciary, interfere with the performance of the judge's judicial responsibilities, or tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.

Not exact matches

The Commission went on to state that «If these claims go unanswered, or are not dealt with, confidence in the judiciary will be undermined as the public becomes convinced that the courts as now constituted are incapable of correctly resolving some of the most pressing legal issues of our day» (p. 11).

According to a new paper on judicial integrity, direct campaign contributions undermine the public's confidence in the judiciary.

This serves to undermine judicial impartiality, fundamental to ensuring the stability of Turkey's legal institutions, and has consequently diminished public confidence in both the judiciary and the government.

But the decision of the inquiry committee to resign en masse has reinforced the perception the proceedings have gone badly awry, and are undermining public confidence in the fair and effective regulation of the ethics of the judiciary.

But «[e] ven if judges were able to refrain from favoring donors, the mere possibility that judges» decisions may be motivated by the desire to repay campaign contributions is likely to undermine the public's confidence in the judiciary.»

We agree wholeheartedly with the Committee's finding that Justice Camp's behaviour has undermined public confidence in the justice system so deeply that he should be removed from the judiciary.

In defining the appropriate degree of involvement of the judiciary in public debate, there are two fundamental considerations.The first is whether the judge's involvement could reasonably undermine confidence in his or her impartiality.The second is whether such involvement may unnecessarily expose the judge to political attack or be inconsistent with the dignity of judicial officIn defining the appropriate degree of involvement of the judiciary in public debate, there are two fundamental considerations.The first is whether the judge's involvement could reasonably undermine confidence in his or her impartiality.The second is whether such involvement may unnecessarily expose the judge to political attack or be inconsistent with the dignity of judicial officin public debate, there are two fundamental considerations.The first is whether the judge's involvement could reasonably undermine confidence in his or her impartiality.The second is whether such involvement may unnecessarily expose the judge to political attack or be inconsistent with the dignity of judicial officin his or her impartiality.The second is whether such involvement may unnecessarily expose the judge to political attack or be inconsistent with the dignity of judicial office.

It undermines public confidence in the federal judiciary at a moment in history when that confidence is needed urgently.

Only 15 per cent of respondents felt that lawyers» use of online social networks negatively affects the public's confidence in the integrity and professionalism of the legal profession, while almost 40 per cent of respondents felt that judges» use of online social networks negatively affects the public's confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, thereby undermining judicial independence.