Sentences with phrase «understand classical terms»

Not exact matches

Taking note of the altered world - consciousness of human beings in this century, according to which Being is to be understood in strictly interpersonal terms, Mühlen suggests, first of all, that the classical expression homoousios, as applied to the Son's relationship to the Father, does not necessarily mean that the Son is of the same substance as the Father but only that he is of equal being (gleichseiendlich) with the Father (VG 13).

I. Black Theology and Classical Theism The term «black theology» is here used to refer primarily to those contemporary African - American and native African systematic theologies which understand that the Christian witness to the...

As normally understood, a classical Turing machine reads one symbol at a time, and in terms of its current state and the symbol read takes an action, which may be to erase, print a new symbol, or move to the right or left one space, after which it goes to a new (or the same) state.

Thus Cyril C. Richardson has criticized the classical formulations of the Trinity as imposing an arbitrary «threeness» upon our theological thinking, and proposes instead a basic twofold distinction between God as Absolute and God as Related.1 This is for Richardson a basic paradox, an apparent self - contradiction, for if we try to bring these aspects into relationship, we compromise God's absoluteness.2 Charles Hartshorne accepts this same twofold distinction, but he removes the contradictory element by understanding it in terms of the abstract and concrete dimensions of God's nature and experience.3

However, this correlation is distinct from that in the article, as it can be understood in terms of classical electromagnetic theory.

By placing behavior in terms of «the dog should do or feel xyz,» it relieves humans of the burden of understanding behavior in terms of antecedents and consequences, as well as understanding how classical conditioning affects a dog's feeling of safety in the environment.

Neither, however, fully unravels the possession / appearance dichotomy inherent in the discussions of ethos that follow Isocrates, referring, in the first instance, to a modern lawyer's self still understood largely in classical terms and, in the second, to the textual features that construct the ethos of a discoursal self while still wavering somewhat between the poles of the dichotomy.