Not exact matches
It's truly a shame that you disparage science and the search for
understanding, and then go on about a loving being who is invisible &
magical, even though you have no evidence at all for such a
thing.
I accept that you believe in some
magical being to explain those
things you don't
understand.
It is easier to convince someone about
magical things if they have less
understanding of science.
The
thing is that most investors don't
understand that the
magical yield is generated by writing options which is far from being a successful strategy all the time (remember the 18 months with NO dividend FTN had?).
Sure everyone is careful to avoid these
things, but if you don't clearly
understand your methods (intimately) and treat statistics or signal processing as «
magical black boxes» you are going to misinterpret results, especially with very weak signals.....
Entity recognition (
understanding, finding and cross-referencing individuals and organisations in documents) is already well established, and software like Autonomy («the leader in meaning based computing») can do
magical things in terms of identifying relationships between «
things» and deriving meaning from raw information (think «facts»).