Scientists continue to investigate past climate change events to better
understand modern climate change, including extreme drought.
Not exact matches
Yet, if I
understand your views regarding the
modern state of Israel and its current conflict with its neighbors correctly, I do have some real concerns — particularly in light of the current political
climate (the U.N. vote on Palestinian statehood) as well as a growing trend among certain Christian polemicists against Israel (see Gary Burge and Stephen Sizer).
I confess that I have become somewhat blasé about the range of exciting — I think revolutionary is probably more accurate — technologies that we are rolling out today: our work in genomics and its translation into varieties that are reaching poor farmers today; our innovative integration of long — term and multilocation trials with crop models and
modern IT and communications technology to reach farmers in ways we never even imagined five years ago; our vision to create a C4 rice and see to it that Golden Rice reaches poor and hungry children; maintaining productivity gains in the face of dynamic pests and pathogens;
understanding the nature of the rice grain and what makes for good quality; our many efforts to change the way rice is grown to meet the challenges of changing rural economies, changing societies, and a changing
climate; and, our extraordinary array of partnerships that has placed us at the forefront of the CGIAR change process through the Global Rice Science Partnership.
«All previous research that's been done trying to
understand this very rapid colonisation of the Pacific tried to grapple with the migration in terms of
modern climate,» says Ian Goodwin of Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
Before we can
understand what past
climate change meant for more animals — «there needs to be a lot more work on
modern animals,» Secord says.
It was, however, only after the advent of the computer that a
modern understanding emerged of how fossil fuel use would impact the
climate.
Our new
understanding of
climate and sea - level change sheds light on something that has long puzzled archaeologists: How did
modern humans colonize the far reaches of the globe so quickly after their exodus from Africa?
Quite possibly the
modern low in public
understanding of
climate science was the November 2009 hacking of the East Anglia e-mails.
At first, White was convinced that humans would
understand the obvious implications of his ice - core data: The consequences of human - caused
climate change «would basically cripple any kind of
modern society.»
«We can't just rely on
modern climate data to
understand the past.
In addition, our deficient
understanding of aerosol forcing also hinders our ability to use the
modern temperature record to constrain the «
climate sensitivity» — the operative parameter in determining exactly how much warming will result from a given increase in CO2 concentration.
Making your money stretch further is one of the challenges of college life, particularly in the
modern economic
climate, and at Ewritingservice.com we
understand such matters well.
In recreating the
modern experience of fragmentation and spectacle, both art and film explore issues of human perception and
understanding of reality that were part of the intellectual
climate of their day.»
FINALLY CONQUER that embarrassing IGNORANCE of
modern art history by
understanding which artistic movement was «the last stand of the isolated artistic self in a
climate of conformity and increasing objectification created by techniques of mass control.»
«Against the backdrop of the current global political
climate, exhibitions like Iran
Modern are essential to fostering a better
understanding of Iran's history.»
«Generally accepted
modern understanding of the global carbon cycle indicates that
climate effects of CO2 releases to the atmosphere will persist for tens, if not hundreds, of housands of years into the future.»
[Response: I would agree with much of this comment, though I'm far less sanguine about our
understanding of D - O events, and I'm far less convinced of their relevance to
modern climate.
The implications of our findings are that the
modern observations of ocean - driven warming along the western Antarctic Peninsula need to be considered as part of a natural centennial timescale cycle of
climate variability, and that in order to
understand climate change along the Antarctic Peninsula, we need to
understand the broader
climate connections with the rest of the planet.
I believe that the cultural cognition of present day
climate change discussions can not be conducted without
understanding of how these underlying philosophies affect
modern attitudes.
Unless your graphs concern
modern climate I have great difficulty
understanding their relevance.
In 2018, the G20 must turn toward delivering the Paris promise by expressing countries» alignment in
understanding climate action as a core component of
modern prosperity.
Replete with great graphics and much humor, Steve Goreham reveals the mountain of failed eco-predictions, rank green hypocrisies and outright fraud that currently masquerades in the guise of
modern environmentalism and «
climate science»... The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism is an easy - to - read, easy - to -
understand expose of all the key facts behind the dirty «green» politics of the greatest pseudo-science racket of our age.»
To
understand this just think in post normal science and «
modern» specialization: How in the world a «
climate scientist» or an «ecologist» watching 8 hours a day at a computer screen can know about nature.
But as I have outlined above, few have a deeper
understanding of the basic science of
climate than I. Almost all big
modern telescopes use my sodium guidestar to correct for atmospheric turbulence.
Festinger's analysis of cognitive dissonance helps us
understand the
modern phenomenon of
climate change denialism.
It is still not well
understood how model biases in simulation of
modern climate affect
climate sensitivity.
To better
understand these discrepancies, a recent study published in Geophysical Research Letters investigates the drivers of changes in deep ocean circulation across a range of
modern and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~ 21000 years ago)
climate simulations from the latest Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP).
This paper opened my eyes to the educational opportunities in addressing misinformation - an approach I adopted in the chapters «
Understanding Climate Change Denial» and «Rebuttals to
Climate Myths» in the textbook
Climate Change Science: A
Modern Synthesis.
The Inquisition Of
Climate Science, available in hard cover and as an e-book that can be read on Kindle, iPad and computer, is a must - read for anyone who wishes to understand the full scope of the denial industry and their modern day persecution of climate s
Climate Science, available in hard cover and as an e-book that can be read on Kindle, iPad and computer, is a must - read for anyone who wishes to
understand the full scope of the denial industry and their
modern day persecution of
climate s
climate science.
Anne, that might be the case if there were not an adequate
understanding of the natural forcings (levels of solar activity and vulcanism) causing the MCA and of anthropogenic forcings (greenhouse gases) largely causing what you call the
Modern Climate Anomaly.
The success of
modern environmentalism hinges on victories in the political arena, and will depend to some extent on how well we are able to
understand with those who disagree with us, to communicate why we want to keep our children's children from despising us for «wasting all the future's fuel and probably screwing up the
climate.»
I guess the politically - aggressive climatologists and their apologists need to work harder, learn some
modern mathematics, to
understand the real nature of
climate.
All of these types of studies are crucial to the
modern understanding of CO2 and
climate.
In contrast, generally accepted
modern understanding of the global carbon cycle indicates that
climate effects ofCO2 releases to the atmosphere will persist for tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of years into the future.»
6 December, 2016 − Observations of Antarctic ice pack from expeditions a century ago are helping
modern scientists to
understand the impacts of
climate change.
The knowledge of
climate and its variability during the past centuries can improve our
understanding of natural
climate variability and also help to address the question of whether
modern climate change is unprecedented in a long - term context (Folland et al. 2001; Jansen et al. 2007; Hegerl et al. 2007; Mann et al. 2008 and references therein).
Simply put, I think Encharter
understands the
modern business
climate and helps one navigate through a field that we all traditionally want to avoid as much as taxes and death.