Sentences with phrase «understand only the feelings»

A preschooler can understand only the feelings, wants, and desires she is having now.

Not exact matches

But understanding the reasons behind the human need to avoid fault and feel validated is only the first step in reversing the credit - and - blame cycle.

I did that for a while, and it was only after I had done that for a little bit and felt like I'd honed my skills and I understood the kitchen, the professional kitchen, that I felt like I could then leave it to [go back and] pursue the writing part because I now had the knowledge and the expertise to do that.»

With years of experience in a particular industry, «these types of entrepreneurs are not only very well positioned to feel what is needed in the market — as they understand it perfectly — but they are also usually pretty good at executing their business as they easily earn their customers» and partners» trust because of their credibility and legitimacy,» claims Soussan.

While the proposed variance wouldn't have affected me much, or even at all, it felt good to not only understand where other people were coming from, but to try to help them.

A survey released last month by the Association of National Advertisers and Forrester Research of ANA members, a group dominated by brand advertisers like P&G, found only 28 % felt they understood programmatic well enough to use it, while another 10 % understood it but still wouldn't use it.

They felt like a secret code only people in the finance industry understood and I started to ask questions.

According to a 2016 Blue Star Family survey, only 12 percent of veterans feel the public understands the sacrifices they and their families have made.

I try to follow Warren Buffet advice and only invest in what I understand (most of the time) but even with good investments I still feel I may have too much in the market right now.

Only 8.2 % of those surveyed felt that at least 75 % of their organization could confidently name their personas and key attributes, revealing an enormous opportunity to help internal stakeholders understand buyers to be more relevant and customer - centric.

So, I guess I can understand the credulity of everyone who only understands what they're told and don't feel like learning anything about math or logic.

I understand that doing the research feels a bit like you lack faith because you don't want to undermine your preconceived beliefs, but that is the only honest thing to do as hiding your head under your pillow does nothing but show how little faith you actually have.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

You feel an exciting sense of satisfaction at hearing that you are not the only one; you are actually heard and UNDERSTOOD.

He will understand that, like Abraham, only a father who feels awe before the true source can deserve the filial awe - and - reverence of his sons (cf. Noah and his sons).

I think that the key, among other things, to understanding the opinions and positions of others is imagination.Try to imagine the Muslim who has lost their whole family to «collateral damage», the gay who has lost their family to rejection... let's lay down our obstinate doctrines that are so quick to offer «the only solution that WE can live with» and walk in their shoes, feel their pain and realize that our medicine is not a «one size fits all»....

Not only are you gaining a better understanding of their opinion, but you're also giving them an opportunity to feel heard and to possibly convey their thoughts in ways they've never been asked to.

In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events are present «in» other events - present not just abstractly (through «eternal objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation when he says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.

But in analyses it can only be understood as a process; it can only be felt as a process, that is to say, as in passage.

As a result of his understanding of what it means to possess knowledge, Hartshorne concludes God not only knows but feels.

@DAVE: man is only pompous when they believe they can understand what a «creator» is thinking and feeling... or how the «creator» did something.

Quoting Whitehead, he indicates what he thinks might be the reason for this lack of understanding: «The truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.»

Some how it's felt that values, morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!

We feel that an understanding of the origins, the development, and the meaning of the teachings, practices, and organization of a religious group to which the sociologist of religion tries to contribute, would not only not interfere with but would actually intensify the loyalty of the members of the group.

I not only feel that I understand...

Nonetheless, he is quite clear that the treatment of judgments must be understood only as one subdivision of propositional feelings since the prehending subject experiencing the proposition is not necessarily involved in judging the proposition (PR 258/395, 187/284).

Writes Dark, «It is only when we're blessed by a feeling of finitude that we can begin to perceive the holy, that sense of a whole before which our limited understanding is dwarfed... Only a twisted, unimaginative mind - set resists awe in favor of self - satisfied certainty... More humility might characterize our talk of God if we believe that the whole truth can never be entirely ours and that our attempts to nail God down are always well - intentioned human constructs at best and idols at worst.&raonly when we're blessed by a feeling of finitude that we can begin to perceive the holy, that sense of a whole before which our limited understanding is dwarfed... Only a twisted, unimaginative mind - set resists awe in favor of self - satisfied certainty... More humility might characterize our talk of God if we believe that the whole truth can never be entirely ours and that our attempts to nail God down are always well - intentioned human constructs at best and idols at worst.&raOnly a twisted, unimaginative mind - set resists awe in favor of self - satisfied certainty... More humility might characterize our talk of God if we believe that the whole truth can never be entirely ours and that our attempts to nail God down are always well - intentioned human constructs at best and idols at worst.»

If you feel like you're constantly giving everything you've got, only to feel shame when achieving perfection proves impossible — Kim knows your struggle, and she's the perfect understanding guide to show you a grace - filled way out.

The reason that Atheists are putting up signs is because we really do feel sorry for the religious people... Only my fellow Atheists would understand where I am coming from with that statement..

In Cobb's version, there is an understanding that despite an indication that presentational immediacy may be equivalent only to one type of perceptive propositional feeling (the direct authentic perceptive feeling), other material suggests that «delusive» perceptions (a variation of direct authentic) are involved as well (PR 122/186).

If the only reason you can't believe in God is based in the fact that you're all offended that the universe isn't all puppies and rainbows, then you didn't understand the contents of the Bible or its intended lessons and you just instead subscribe to New Age feel - good modern church cultures.

A common sense approach would have been to say that now that we understood that human thought and feeling are part of nature, we should no longer suppose that nature consists only of material objects in relative motion.

The disappointment I feel is immense that so many on here are walking away, ramming their own understanding of the scriptures down people's throats as if their interpretation is the only one that counts and judging «homos» as «sinners» and «going to hell» blah blah blah......... Let me help you with that, YOU ARE NOT GOD!!

It is only slight exaggeration to state that he feels the traditional Western religious and philosophical understanding of God to be such a mass of errors and inconsistencies as to require removal in toto from the body of metaphysical thought.

The German - American thinker Eugen Rosenstock - Huessy agreed that speech is always a two - step, and that the listener's role is never merely receptive or passive: «Language is not [only] speech, it is a full circle from word to sound to perception to understanding to feeling, to memorizing, to acting, and back to the word about the act thus achieved.»

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

One has only to recall the dread which modern people have of cemeteries, particularly at night, to understand how the Egyptians felt about this.

Rarely, and then only in contemporary writings, do Hindus or Buddhists refer to Christianity or Judaism, arousing defensive feelings which lead us to suggest that they would not have said what they did if they understood our religion better.

Alexander is treated only briefly, by relating his pervasive «principle of unrest» to the first category of explanation, and by suggesting the resemblance of his term «enjoyment» in Space, Time and Deity (1920) to Whitehead's concept of «Feeling» and Bergson's understanding of «intuition» (PR 28 / 42f.

we believe in «mind» but we never see it, we only feel that it is our mind and not some chemical activity in the brains; we believe in air but we never see it, and do not understand why we need air to live.

Remember that He is the only one who understands fully why you feel what you do.

Perhaps by acknowledging them and understanding them better, we can reduce our sense of isolation and guilt and prevent these feelings from festering into a basically destructive relationship — not only for the clergy spouses but for all members of a parsonage family, and for the church as a whole.

Calvin thus perceived in the crucifixion not only the price of redemption, but also the archetype of faith as he understood it: seeing God even in the midst of agonies of body and soul, when every natural feeling cries out that God must be against me.

My first assumption is rather conventional, namely, that God's own feelings toward a given existential situation in the world are effected through an integration of the divine primordial and consequent natures within the divine being; what could be and should be is somehow reconciled with what de facto is the case but in a way that only God fully knows and understands.

I often feel the weight of the remnants, but it is only because understanding my Self through God is a process.

Assignments of this sort assume a willingness on the part of both partners not only to understand the feelings and activities of the other but also to work out a lifestyle fair to both.

There is so much we do not yet understand, but i have felt no rebuke from God, only HIS LOVE.

I wondered when we would know better how to help children more widely in schools and homes to understand their feelings, and when we would be able to help parents understand theirs, so that the boys and girls now growing up might know not only about tanks and bullets but about the most powerful of all weapons for both good and evil — the human feelings that propel us, if we do not understand them, into hating in place of loving, into killing instead of creation.

I have long felt that reading «with a view to do» was the best — and perhaps the only — way to understand Scripture.

He feels that the relativism of knowledge was implicitly contained in a confusion in scientific theory from the time of Galileo: «The idea of a science and of an experience entirely relative to the human understanding was therefore implicitly contained in the conception of a science, one and integral composed of laws: Kant only brought it to light» (CE 251).