Sentences with phrase «understand other points»

Playing is linked to the development of resilience and the beginnings of empathy as children begin to understand other points of view.

Yet, at the same time she did it while respecting and even trying to understand the other points the religious members had.

We are to love one another and part of that is sidestepping our own perception and assumptions to better understand other points of view, including those we might not agree with.

It somewhere depends on you also, like we said this earlier also if you are honest, open and intelligent to understand others point of view then things will be easier for you also it will be sorted for you.

Not exact matches

In other words, you value friendliness and empathy, even when you're just getting your oil changed... Above all else, always be nice, and make an effort to understand and empathize with your buyers» and sellers» points of view.»

Asking more questions in your attempt to understand their point of view will also help diffuse the situation as you are showing a genuine desire to hear what the other person has to say.

Try to understand the other person's point - of - view, concerns and feelings by asking more questions.

He makes a point of sharing the type of information that will help others avoid mistakes that he made when he was just starting out, and of taking complex ideas (like big data or digital marketing technologies) and explaining them in a way that beginners can understand.

The supremely nationalist Chinese will come to understand nationalism from the other end: from that point of view, they are just another colonial power jockeying for someone else's wealth.

And when you do speak again, ask a follow - up question that helps you better understand the other person's point of view.

«In responding to this incident — indeed in responding to this election — we need to hear each other's stories, not slogans, we need to work towards understanding, not scoring points, and we need to find a way to move forward that respects and values each and every member of our community,» Superintendent Shawn Lewis - Lakin said in a statement.

While it's highly unlikely that any Kobo users will end up on a Canadian watchlist, the point remains: ship your data abroad, and it falls into other jurisdictions and other legal systems that you don't necessarily vote for or understand.

By listening, you can understand what others see from their point of view instead of your own.

Doing so helps clarify the other person's point of view, and shows that you care about understanding where they're coming from.

So understanding how people perceive moral tipping points is important because it illuminates how we as a society create different thresholds for rewarding versus punishing others.

The greatest source of contention is oftentimes a failure to take the time to understand each other's point of view.

Inspiring article to use longtail, we understand such keywords gives good traffic but at some point can it be negative (copied content) to use 7 - 8 longtail in same article as they can be on other sites also.

Note that the National Venture Capital Association has developed a comprehensive set of annotated draft agreements for its members, and this provides entrepreneurs with a useful starting point to understand the manner in which VCs approach corporate governance and other issues.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

It's at this point the business needs an operating plan, financial forecasts and other well - understood management tools.

This points out that everything that you explained as being only aplicable to god, which is an explanation given because no other explanation is seen, saying this is amazing so god did it, is nowhere near close to looking at these phenomena, observing and collecting the data on it and saying this is our best understanding of it to date.

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

More to the point, it would be an almost pointless exercise since Texas hospitals seem to have a tacit understanding that they will honor each other's futile care determinations.

My point is, it's great to allow others to develop and have their own «understandings and convictions» but what about when their convictions harm other people?

Evolution is just as real as gravity, and as others have pointed out, we do not have a «complete» understanding of either of these, but that does not mean that either gravity or evolution are «false».

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

i; m not sure i follow your little brother thing, but sharing ideas and a conversation with two differing view points is a debate, and if both parties don't try to kill the other one this is a world of understanding thru conflict, for a differing point of view is in confliction with the others.

Science writers Carl Sagan and Fritjof Capra have pointed out similarities between the latest scientific understanding of the age of the universe, and the Hindu concept of a «day and night of Brahma», which is much closer to the current known age of the universe than other creation myths.

All biblical evidence points to the fact that there was an understanding about the nature of the earth and many other topics far beyond the secular understanding of the time.

Then you admit your illogical ranting about how there was an uproar when the Bible was published in other languages has nothing to do with my point about the absurdity of requiring people to read the Quran in Arabic in order to properly understand it.

Good point, but now to fully understand the topic approach it from the other side, if God does exist then what value does scripture hold.

@tea: i still do not understand why all you jesus freaks insist on making darwin the point of your anti-evolution propaganda when he only placed the first stone; hundreds if not thousands of other sciectists have refined and attempted to debunk the progess of evolution along the way and all have failed to.

My point is I don't understand how all those people are saying they don't want to pay for others... how do I say this without CNN blocking my post?

Yet, as Mark points out, we all agree that love, etc. exist — primarily because we have a «shared experience» of them; i.e., we can «explain,» at least in basic terms that others can understand, what those things are.

Atheists compare what we perceive as fantasy to other fantasies so you can understand our view point.

don't point them to bertrand russels teapot analogy... it just confuses them more — and you stand the chance of them actually understanding it — thus depriving others the comedy they provide when they raise such arguments from ignorance.

I read through the comments section and I am now better able to understand Danica, Catie and all others», who felt betrayed by TLS, point of view.

I continue to learn about important distinctions between sociopathology and narcissism, and other such points relevant to expanding our understanding of the dynamics of abuse.

As we pointed out earlier, this situatedness inevitably will shape their understanding of themselves, their neighbors, larger social realities, and, among other matters, God.

My concern here is that WTS and other Reformed institutions are elevating Calvin's theological interpretation of God to the point that it is understood to be a comprehensive explanation of God, the only «right» way of thinking about Him and worshipping Him.

Peter seems to bounce from one verbal extreme to the other — at one point saying more about Jesus than he really understands, later denying that he even knows him.

Perhaps I may not even have understood some of these things, perhaps they are simply demanded by love for the others, for the Church, which means a certain member of the Church at a certain point of time.

This incident marked a major turning point in Buber's theological understanding, a turning away from otherworldly ecstasy and a turning toward the concrete other whom God has sent.

As I grew older I discovered that other churches had a wide range of understandings of what the Bible said at almost every point.

First, each of them has perfect self - knowledge and unlimited understanding of the other two persons; there are, accordingly, no points of disagreement between them as a result of ignorance or simple misunderstanding of one another's intentions.

I think that his approach to dismissing other points of view is holding our children back from understanding the scientific method.

The other side of this same point is that by ignoring the particular settings in which Scripture is read we risk losing the richness that varying perspectives may bring to our understanding of the truth of Scripture.

Is your point that you understand John 13:35 to be referring to people being known as Jesus» disciples because they love one another (disciples loving each other?)

This article does point out that people claim others are committing blasphemy for what they themselves don't even understand.

If you can't understand my explanation above and see that as an attempt at discrediting, without pointing out where exactly it's wrong, then there isn't much more I can do, other than hope one day you'll learn something.