It can be difficult to
understand religious ideals that call for covering.
Not exact matches
By comparing the
religious structure and historical evolution of Buddhist soteriological
ideals with those of Christianity, we might better
understand the bases of Christian beliefs about salvation.
If religion is
understood in its elemental sense, and not merely in its sectarian expressions, it is entirely practicable for the public schools to educate religiously without violating any
ideals of
religious freedom, without partisanship for any historical tradition, and without transgressing the principle of persuasion, not compulsion, in all matters of faith.
I'm not
religious, or a Christian, but surely everyone
understands that the current Western model of Jesus is an idealization in the image of the worshiper's
ideal... right?