Sentences with phrase «understand than the old one»

On the surface, the new food pyramid, introduced in 2005, didn't seem any easier to understand than the old one.

An independent review found that California's old standards are pretty similar to the CCSS.2 The new standards cover fewer topics at each grade but require a deeper understanding than the old state standards.

It is much easier to understand than my old style of bullets and a brief summary.

Not exact matches

Whether it's for a coffee date, a catch up with an old friend or even an interview, going to Starbucks or Philz is an experience, and entrepreneurship means understanding how to create a feeling, rather than simply sell a product.

What it does mean, is that once kids are old enough to understand the finer points of language (and according to Bergen, that's probably younger than you imagine), there's no cause for guilt if you use (and they pick up) some less - than - demure language.

Those findings might be more scientific than the old»em o kids are dark» stereotypes, but honestly they're not all that far from the common understanding.

understand, however, that trends are clearly moving towards embracing flexible work as a way of doing business, rather than doing business the same old way.

My grandmother, a sweet old lady who grew up in the»30 and» 40's, used terms to describe people she didn't understand (which means anyone different than her) in ways that would make you blush.

There are many inaccuracies, because after more than 10 years the bureaucracy has not understood that technology can displace the old way of creating wealth without the traditional banks, which control or control the banking and securities, so we are at doors to new ways of doing business.

As you grow older you hopefully grow wiser, and you begin to understand from your own honest self - analysis that our problems are greater, more complex and more mysterious than any answer.

To be clear, you explained why this happens (although I dispute your comments about females becoming «ripe» — «But understand that females at hotter areas become ripe at earlier age and if body was built well enough and had her monthly period coming early age than she is ready minimum 9 years old...»), but I'm more interested in whether or not it is accepted legally, morally or according to islam.

Don't know how old she was that Musa married to at... But understand that females at hotter areas become ripe at earlier age and if body was built well enough and had her monthly period coming early age than she is ready minimum 9 years old... There are still in some small cities, villages and remote areas families are having their daughters marrying at such age to men that could reach upto 80 years old...!

I understand the urge to refute the Bible, but this discovery says nothing other than the fact that we haven't found bones older than the 10th century B.C. Does that mean there are none?

igaftr, yes you are right cats and all the animals in the world including you is part of the universe, eveything is God, it took Him 13.7 billion years for us to arrive what we are now, meaning the true reality of our existence, you are probably less than 50 years old, so how can you expect to equate yourself or pretend to understand Him, God Who is 13.7 billion years old.

Lutheran theology's antinomian tendency makes it perhaps more vulnerable than the other Reformation traditions in spite of the countervailing forces of its sociology and its doctrinal tradition, although here and there an older methodology, which understands that the Gospel does not negate the commandments, lives side by side with neo-Lutheranism and makes possible at least a tentative no to the likes of the task force.

12:30) Wiser was the queen of Sheba, who of old came to Solomon to hear his wisdom; wiser were the Ninevites, who repented at the preaching of the prophet Jonah — wiser than the fools of this generation, who do not understand what is happening before their eyes.

Rather than make assumptions about what my personal understanding of this old testament story might be, why don't you ask what it is.

It is indeed to be considered «free thinking» to always curiously trying to understand the origins of life and the universe through science rather than just accepting a 2,000 year old (or more) fairy tale.

Anyone who sounds aggrieved or — in the case of Solnit's enemies — more high - minded and principled can always summon an avenging army of supporters from the vast population of Internet - dwellers unwilling to spend more than five seconds trying to understand the dispute at hand, but endlessly willing to get a quick hit of that old self - congratulation.

If we do have an understanding of the conversation then the definitions of these «packed» concepts are subjective and we wind up debating terms like «following Jesus» which means something entirely different to me than it did to my 92 year old grandmother.

It is not possible simply to collate hesed and agape into a single understanding, even though they are closely interrelated — and even though the New Testament language of agape clearly owes more to the meanings of love in the Old Testament than to the ordinary meanings of the word in the Hellenistic environment.

1) Creationism is not the oldest theory of origins.You do understand that there are older religions than Christianity, right?

My understanding was that the Word is none other than the Torah, (the Old Testament).

It is possible, of course, that Jesus and the apostles were also mistaken, and that their affirmation of all these challenging Old Testament texts reflects nothing more than their limited horizons of understanding.

While it theologically doesn't make sense, the Christian Church does allow for a place to fulfill psychological needs (the need to belong, to understand, to name but two examples), and, to follow up with Kenneth's suggestion, it should be trying to tackle real world questions rather than simply rehashing old scripture.

I know you are going to argue the consenting adult issue but a 17 year old raised by gay parents will have a very different understanding of relationships than will a 17 year old raised by Christ's standards.

You said, «I know you are going to argue the consenting adult issue but a 17 year old raised by gay parents will have a very different understanding of relationships than will a 17 year old raised by Christ's standards.»

You know, understanding the world through observation and rational conclusion, rather than through believing everything that an old book of myths tells us.

and relight old fires of hatred and pain, I would worry about the safety too of the good American Muslims, although it was radicals to have a Mosque where 3,000 were killed seems to me to rub salt in wounds for many, I don't really understand what happened to the plans of statues and tributes to those lost in 911, other than a money factor.It seems like this Mosque will be viewed as a Trojan horse, no religion would want a house of worship to be a reminder of hatred.it should be a place reminding the world of peace and love if it's a place of worship, and in that location it will not bring a feeling of peace.

When this world began to become more complex, pluralistic and morally ambiguous and it also became clear that influences other than those which could easily be understood on Main Street decided the course of events, both the old teachings and the institutions that taught them began to seem less relevant.

A revised philosophy of mechanism, understood from a contemporary image of a machine, must recognize that a good model is the best vehicle for describing nature, rather than old images of machines, which are not complex enough to represent adequately a reaction of a complex entity with its environment.

M.d religion is about man there is alot of man in the evangelical church as well as other churchs however the Holy spirit is the one we lean on to teach us Gods word he reveals the scriptures just as though Jesus was teaching his disciples in his day.Often after speaking in parable his disciples would ask what he meant and he would give them insight into the messages.I find for me if i struggle understanding a topic i ask the holy spirit to help me if you havent received him just invite him into your life if you have already confessed Jesus as your Lord and savior.We can not live a christian life without him.He is the one who empowers us to live righteously rather than according to our old nature.In the last year or so he has been showing me extraordinary insight into the word its new its fresh he is amazing.brentnz

Since His love - in - operation is His essential nature — He is love, which is His «root - attribute», not aseity, as the older theology claimed — the other things said about Him (transcendence, immanence, omnipotence, omniscience, omni - presence, righteousness, etc.) are to be understood, as I have already argued earlier, as adverbially descriptive of His mode of being love rather than set up as separate or even as distinct attributions.

But this thesis is far more helpful in understanding the spread of Protestantism in Africa (for which this act of biblical translation has been fundamental) than Catholicism in Africa (where as late as the 1950s, there was no full African translation of the Old Testament for Catholics).

Either way it results in christians being saved, and either way the focus is on departing from old works, and either way it is concerning chastisement and punishment rather than damnation, but I do think it is important to fully understand.

Which if you don't understand is ridiculous, as we have more than enough proof on both the fact that the earth is a sphere and that the earth is 4.3 billion years old.

This new vision can then be understood to be more faithful to Christ than was the old.

So far, I have presented most of the major theories about how to understand the Violence of God in the Old Testament, and rather than just blurt out why my view is, I am going to lead you through the theological and Scriptural reasoning that I went through to get to my view.

I propose that since Jesus reveals the Father to us, that since Jesus is the exact representation of God, that since Jesus says that if we have seen Him, we have seen the Father, that rather than seek to understand Jesus in light of the God of the Old Testament, we seek to understand God in the Old Testament in light of Jesus.

If you can not understand that the earth is 4.5 billion years old than you can not understand basic science.

The issue i have is that christians stay at the cross and never go any further in there belief that is tragic and if the songs and teachings only lead them to the cross then that is a crime.The cross represents our death as we were crucified with him and after that death we rose with Christ.Sadly many christians are still at the cross still struggling with there demons and flesh life and asking for forgiveness continually pleading the blood.They do nt understand because they are babes in Christ The reality is that Christ died and rose again our life is not in the Cross but is in the risen Christ and in him we are more than conqueres.Lets celebrate our new life in Christ not the death of our old life in Christ.brentnz

Then too in the old South (outside of Virginia) there was much more understanding of art than of science.

Most of the time they are the ones who say there is no God because they find it ridiculous to believe there's an old man up in the sky with a robe on looking down on all of us but they at the same time they don't understand how that belief is very limited because my friend, it's a lot more than that.

Thus, we come to the unbridgeable gap between the New Testament theologian and the theistic existentialist, and we find that it is an old issue returning in a new form: is the historical Jesus necessarily anything more than an example we seek to imitate in his worship of the Father (Harnack) or in his breakthrough to true existential self - understanding (Jaspers)?

The Lord, who is proclaimed in the gospel as God's definitive and focal activity in manhood for our wholeness, takes us into himself, makes us one with himself, lives in us as we live in him, to the end that we may be knit together in «a bundle of life» in a much deeper sense than the Old Testament writer of that wonderful phrase could ever understand.

«As I've gotten older, and I've read more books and talked to more people,» says Brian Fremeau of Football Outsiders, «the history of college football that I have come to understand more fully has produced such a rich culture, richer than what I would call the â $ ˜ sterile» culture of professional sports.

I can understand that to some extent as we do seem to be getting hit with the same old bad luck on the injury front, but I think we have a lot of reasons to look forward to our next match, especially as our opponents Man United are in a much worse situation than we are.

Is a year - and - a-half older than Bumgarner, and I'm not sure I understand your point about command going to a higher level.

Of course if you are a nine year old schoolkid then I understand why you wrote as you did; kids of that age not being mature and not knowing better than to make fun of an unimportant speech impediment.

Add to that the fact that the 23 - year old was very rarely used in the centre forward role before becoming a Gunner and you can understand why the manager has called for Arsenal fans to be patient with him, but Welbeck seems to have settled in to the club much quicker and easier than we could have hoped.