Sentences with phrase «understand than your comment»

The only thing harder to understand than your comment is understanding how it has anything to do with what Sabio actually said.

Not exact matches

To be clear, you explained why this happens (although I dispute your comments about females becoming «ripe» — «But understand that females at hotter areas become ripe at earlier age and if body was built well enough and had her monthly period coming early age than she is ready minimum 9 years old...»), but I'm more interested in whether or not it is accepted legally, morally or according to islam.

Even after reading your lengthy comment, Doug, I'm having a difficult time understanding how what you're up to here amounts to more than basic concern trolling.

From the comments I have read I am beginning to see why there are Christians who just proclaim non-believers are going to hell rather than trying to be tolerable and understanding.

This sort of comment reflects a tendency to revise the understanding of praxis: one's expectations of oneself as a theologian and of the actual possibilities of a transformative praxis as a whole are perhaps more humble and limited than they would have been 30 years ago.

Indeed, he understands the country better than many American academics do and has some illuminating comments to make about American religion: «Although the European media chooses to ignore it, the US has an extraordinary range of religious public intellectuals....

I like this comment you made: > I believe that John, in his Gospel, is trying to get people to see that Jesus is God, and is possibly trying to instill more meaning in the terms «Christ» and «Son of God» than the average person in the first century would have understood or immediately grasped.

Fortunately Mary, there are people out there who actually understand evolution, who have studied evolution and who have doc.umented and taught evolution, so that those of us with even a rudimentary education on the topic can dismiss your comment as nothing more than the desperate and childish attempt to cling to religion even as the rest of the world grows up and embraces reality.

These are one of my favorite treats, but I understand not everyone has the same taste, which is why I'd like to leave your comment here to inform others whose tastes might align more closely with yours than mine.

I read all of the comments and thoroughly read the recipe hoping to understand why you added coconut butter, rather than exclusively using cacao butter.

But if the comment was more generally speaking, than I understand.

Later in your comment, you seem to understand how smack - talk / playful ribbing of a rival / long - time opponent works: Both sides cherry - pick facts to either make fun of the other team, pump up our own team or make our team look better than the other guy's team.

Also, some fans need to understand that every academy graduate is not «the next» whoever... saw someone comment that «Gnabry is better than Sterling» and hoards thumbed it up.

not really much to come on here for other than abuse, or to read one negative comment after another... which as I guess some of you may understand isn't really what anyone much feels like when Arsenal lose.

Now I understand this is an Arsenal page rather than a matter for England, but Walcott's comments on giving a few of his secrets away is sure to worry many Gunners.

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

Some of the comments made by our great manager this month have been really laughable BUT i expected nothing different as he will not sign anyone of note AS USUAL!!!!! The Yaya Sanogo signing looks even more ridiculous in the gran scheme of things BUT that's wenger for you, i also hope he has a conscience and understands that we need to win something this year and if not the league title then we must at least finish second NOT 3rd OR 4th to show some improvement anythingt other than that and he should not renew his contract.

Ignore them as they are rubbish because instead of looking it from your point of view, trying to understand why of all people, you decide Denilson was a better fit in that team vs Liverpool, they go out and bash your article without so much of a thought with (Insert Name) is better than Denilson, or degrading comments.

I've simply stated the position he is playing in is not my cup of tea I prefer midfielders to have more in the locker, not really too hard to comprehend and it's not blinds fault he's being asked tp play the role he's playing in, on matic I've mentioned him twice on these blogs thats it in all my time commenting that's hardlybmr keep mentioning him and I reply to those calling him a defensive mid, I've merely pointed out he's got mire to his game than being a defensive midfielder, again not rocket science or hard to understand!

There are times when I feel like whatever paper she's discussing is out of my league in terms of understanding (or simply not available full - text), so I don't have much to say, although I appreciate her post and the comments of those who are smarter than I am.

@JimmyJames: Perhaps I understood your comment «The search was a direct result of Mueller's actions...» to say something other than what you intended?

Cookfair's attorney is Thomas J. Cerio of Syracuse, and he would not comment other than to say he understands his client is not a target of the investigation.

Richard Wiseman, professor in the Public Understanding of Psychology at the University of Hertfordshire, commented: «This is a huge rise, and the results are extremely worrying because getting less than seven hours sleep a night is below the recommended guidelines, and is associated with a range of problems, including an increased risk of weight gain, heart attacks, diabetes and cancer.»

-- Namco Bandai understands that fans want more Tales game in English — Time and money get in the way — Namco Bandai has taken steps to alleviate the issues above, and hopefully we can now look forward to seeing more Tales games worldwide — It's been difficult to fit the game on the 3DS card due to size restrictions — Voice data in particular was challenging to put on the card and feels they solved the problem while keeping the quality high — «Every part of the game, with the exception of the animated cut - scenes, has been redone in 3D» — Yoshizumi believes this makes the game seem more real / immersive than before — Character models rebuilt to improve performance — Rest of the game has been ported over seamlessly — Some changes made to «in - game parameters» to compensate for control differences — No other additions, no new weapons / artes — No communication features (StreetPass, SpotPass)-- Namco Bandai have talked about a sequel, but haven't yet come up with something that would be good enough for a full game — Yoshizumi says he appreciates the comments he receives on Twitter from worldwide fans, and he hopes that more Tales games can make it over in the future — Load times have been improved on significantly — Steadier frame rate (may have been referring to the world map specifically)-- Skits will remain unvoiced

John Corbett, who apparently understands Christian men about as well as Hollywood does, commented at the film's press junket about his character, «I thought I could make him a little different than your typical pastor... I thought I could make him more likeable.»

Commenting on the figures, Rudolf Eliott Lockhart, chief executive of the Religious Education Council of England and Wales, said: «While it is fantastic to see increasing numbers of students opting to take the full course GCSE in Religious Studies, a reflection of the attraction of an academically rigorous subject that helps prepare students to understand an increasingly diverse modern world, we should not ignore the troubling news that declining entries for the short course mean that more than 100,000 fewer young people have studied the subject at GCSE level this year than in 2010.

Lortie - Forgues, Tian and Siegler (2015) repeated the question with students of the same age in 2014 — 27 per cent got it right, leading the researchers to comment: «Thus, after more than three decades, numerous rounds of education reforms, hundreds if not thousands of research studies on mathematics teaching and learning, and billions of dollars spent to effect educational change, little improvement was evident in students» understanding of fraction arithmetic.»

But science is about the HOW and the WHY of the physical world and there's no getting around math in determining, for example, how the moon's gravity interacts with the Earth anymore than I can write this comment and make it intelligible without some basic understanding of the «math» of writing — grammar, syntax, etc — how words fit together to convey ideas.

Paulster2 said «you can cause damage to the crank and rods themselves» but I don't necessarily understand why so I thought I'd ask a question rather than just adding a comment

So am I correct in my understanding that the only problem with my answer is that it should have been posted in comments rather than as an answer?

My wife commented that she has «Navigation envy» since my screen is so much easier to view and understand than her car.

By posting or uploading any Content on the Website: (i) you understand that if your Work is in aliterary categoryincluded on the Book Country Website, and complies with these General Terms of Use, your Work may be made accessible to users of the Website and members will be able to review, comment on it and rate it; (ii) you represent and warrant that (A) the Content does not contain any libelous matter or matter otherwise contrary to law or violate any rights of privacy or other personal or property right whatsoever and (B) you own or control all rights in your Content, that such Content is original and does not, and will not, infringe the copyright, trademark or any other right of any person or entity, and that any «moral rights» in the Content have been waived; and (iii) you grant to us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty - free, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable right and license (A) to display the Content on the Website, and (B) with respect to Content other than your Work, to use, display, reproduce, distribute, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, perform, make, sell and export such Content, in whole and in part, on the Website or in any formats and through any media, as we see fit, and you shall have no claims against Book Country for such use or non-use.

The author Jane Steen is particularly clear in her comment on the need for independent authors to understand themselves as professional members of the industry rather than as renegades:

Example: Many people (myself included) don't appreciate 1 - star reviews on the Kindle DX that include only comments such as «I can't understand how anyone could pay more than $ 300 for this thing!

It baffles me when people make comments like this — you love animals more than people - but you support Trump — a hunter who sport hunts with his family on a regular basis and has no regard for the environment (where animals actually LIVE) I wish so bad I could understand your logic, as the hypocracy is literally killing me..

Some people don't understand the deep grief experienced with this loss and will many times make comments that are more hurtful than helpful.

Commenting on today's news, Chris Carnicelli, CEO, Generali Global Assistance said «As travel insurance and its myriad benefits become better understood, people are choosing to insure trips at a lower price point than they did in the past.

Look @dboyman comment then you can understand my thoughts on Sony needing to show me more than trailers of how the online experience is supposed to be.

If they really understood the science, then the occasional outbursts by denialists would generate no more notice than a fart in polite company — a little embarassment for the offender, but no overt comment.

Any correspondence to go out will be circulated prior to transmission I hope I have captured what was agreed — please comment if your understanding is different than mine Cheers, Dave

RGATES Yes thanks, That much was already clear from your earlier comments though, and doesn't relate to my question — which has I fear has itself become unclear due to my attempts to rephrase it... Anyway, so we understand that there can be factors other than greenhouses gasses warming the earth, but that's not what I'm asking about.

I don't understand your comment that some bands are emitting at a higher temperature than they should be; (296 versus 288).

You understand what I wrote, but rather than disagree with my comment, and take your own position, you make your usual attempt to continue asking questions.

Yet we have commenters — most — commenting on it who don't understand this (or don't want ot, or their skepticism is getting in the way of even being able to intelligently entertain the idea) yet who are profession opinions routinely on this site as if they have more knowledge on the subject than the world's leading climate scientists, or are simply better scientists than them.

Hi - Dan I put some links in my other comment, more than just my understanding - Andrew montford response (and others) to Cook's 97 % consensus - He was part of it, isn't everyone.

He put a simple piece of evidence out there without providing any context for understanding, other than the general bent of his other comments.

If I understand your comment correctly, then I think a simpler scheme, which might have slightly more than a snowball's chance in hell of getting passed by the legislature in my country (USA), would be double taxation as I shall describe.

I understand you have misunderstood my capacity to interpret your comments and your figures and you have given me more credit than you should.

That was my earlier comment here about the permafrost study: it's just another study telling us what we already know, namely that we are in deep trouble, that the closer we look at AGW and the better we understand it, the more we see that it is worse than we expected and getting worse faster than expected.

It wasn't aimed at doing so, merely at understanding those who imagine that well - established scientific research can be overturned by debates in blog comments threads, based on talking points rather than evidence.