Sentences with phrase «understanding human animal»

We invest in a huge amount of research, from cutting - edge advances in pet nutrition, to understanding human animal interaction and the benefits this brings to pets, people and society.

We understand the human animal bonding as we are pet owners too and therefore treat them as members of our family.

We animal lovers can spend so much time with each other, we lose sight of the fact that a whole big universe of people is out there - people who don't understand the human animal bond because they weren't taught the value of pets.

Not exact matches

He outlines three forms of consciousness: the simple consciousness of animals and humans; the self - consciousness of humans, which includes reason and imagination; and cosmic consciousness, which transcends factual understanding.

The fact that some animals can not reason or talk in language we understand should be as irrelevant to us as is the fact that some humans in relation to whom we have ethical obligations — severely retarded children, for example — can neither reason nor talk.

I did find that they were suppose to be animals that understood human language and hunters would chat to them.

The biblical understanding of having dominion over the earth is not rightly interpreted to mean that human beings are free to abuse animals.

Is Christian love to be understood as identical with a universal human phenomenon that is in turn continuous with the affection animals show for one another and for men?

This question might seem especially arcane to the non-theologian, but this disagreement on animal futures impacts our very theological understanding of creation, as Hart demonstrated with his discussion of the necessity of creation for humans to be able to «see» God.

Since the human developed out of the subhuman, and since this process of development was a continuous one, it is essential to understand what man has in common with other animals, as well as to describe the threshold that marked his appearance as something genuinely and decisively new.

Darwin's theory of evolution, as understood by most of the modern scientific community, has nothing to say about the «gap» between humans and «lower» animals, because no such gap is recognized.

The constitution of a society prescribes the forms of justice only when it provides for that kind of interaction among individuals, and between individuals and the physical environment, which creates the human mind, and which sustains that scope of understanding, power of action and richness of appreciation which is distinctively human in contrast to the lower animals.

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

madtown, The evolutionary process that effect His will is not interventionary in its process, it follows the law of nature, God is not Human, we are only part of Him, our wisdom is infinitesimaly small, The reason is beyond us, just like History, it is only after thousands or millions of years that we understood why it happened, for example, Why the dynasours got extinct, millions of years ago, to pave the way for smaller animals and ultimately humans, Thats why to apply the present human logic on history is illogically simpliHuman, we are only part of Him, our wisdom is infinitesimaly small, The reason is beyond us, just like History, it is only after thousands or millions of years that we understood why it happened, for example, Why the dynasours got extinct, millions of years ago, to pave the way for smaller animals and ultimately humans, Thats why to apply the present human logic on history is illogically simplihuman logic on history is illogically simplistic.

I agree with you that the human mind has great capacity as we were given certain gifts that allow us to understand the creator which the rest of the animal kingdom does not possess.

Another — one that acknowledges that human beings are, as William Hazlitt once put it, poetical animals, that we are deeply affected by beauty and form — would be to cultivate in Christian circles an understanding of true beauty.

Robin Fox is an English anthropologist who has authored, with the equally delightfully named Lionel Tiger, The Imperial Animal and many other works making the case for the «nature» side of the interminable nature / nurture controversy over how best to understand why human beings do what they do.

Unfortunately, proving that CAR activists are mistaken on their understanding of human - animal relations does not necessarily translate into support for trapping.

In light of humanity's privileged position, it is perfectly legitimate to understand that humans have authority over creation and animals.

He / she / it, is just another atheist who can't understand that having or practicing a religion is one of those traits that separates and differentiates us HUMAN beings from animals.

For example, in one of the better chapters, entitled «Human Justice and Animal Fairness», the reader is introduced to Maasai systems of gift - giving, game theory as applied to chimpanzee behaviour, canine sensitivity to fairness, rules of play among wolves and rats, before a brief detour into Martha Nussbaum's development of Rawlsian justice theory leads us to an extended discussion of Aquinas» understanding of justice as a virtue, acquired and infused.

I favor the interpretation that in the beginning, God didn't create physical light, but rather the «Light of Understanding» in humans who were still not much more than animals.

It is likely also that of all animals only human beings have had the equipment with which to foresee death and to try to understand it.

«We're doing a lot to understand the components of fishes, like omega - 3 fatty acid, and their impact on human, environmental and animal health.

Whatever, we need to understand that human beings are definitely not monogamous animals instead of allowing silly religious ideas to continue to propagate.

The findings may have wider implications for our understanding of animal, or even human, reproduction, she adds.

Stephanie Mitchell / Harvard staff photographer Understanding similarities in the cognitive and moral capacities of humans with animals can make humans...

To better understand their findings, the team examined the animal model for APS1 (i.e. mice with the same genetic defect as human patients with the syndrome) and found that male mice spontaneously developed an inflammatory disease in their prostate glands — a so - called prostatitis — and reacted to transglutaminase 4.

Scientists believe that a better understanding of how sperm length influences fertilization success in non-human animals such as the zebra finch may point us in new directions for investigation in human fertility research.

A number of recent news stories have had a similar kind of message: animals viscerally understand certain mathematical operations better than humans do.

«Understanding the links people have to armadillos and how this bug is transmitted between animals and human beings is an important question,» Truman says.

Understanding similarities in the cognitive and moral capacities of humans with animals can make humans better conservationists, speakers told journalists at an event organized by AAAS» program of Dialogue on Science, Ethics, and Religion.

The researchers hope the study will lead to a better understanding of how skilled livestock are in their aptitude to solve problems and interact with humans based on their cognitive abilities — and to an improvement in animal welfare in general.

Hackett said, «Studies of human immunology are usually not the first choice for research in basic immunology, but it is very important now to understand how humans differ from animal models.»

The study provides a new understanding of how, billions of years ago, the complex cell types that comprise plants, fungi, but also animals and humans, evolved from simple microbes.

If we are looking for the real engine for infection — the driver of the disease factory, if you like — we have to understand what human - to - human transmission is, and how it turns an animal disease into a human one.

Future work will, I hope, shed light on the neural underpinnings of these disorders and allow us to better understand why humans are such social animals.

The ability to study such complex neurological responses in a simple animal like the worm helps scientists understand the more complex systems that exist in humans.

These animal models have added huge volumes to our understanding of human and animal biology, and will continue to add to our knowledge for many years to come.

Understanding how the virus operates offers a pathway to designing antiviral drugs as well as new vaccines to control bluetongue and related viral infections in animals and humans.

That kind of monitoring helped scientists understand the factors that trigger flu viruses to jump from animals to humans — and it may one day lead to a similar understanding for Ebola.

«Moreover, a comprehensive understanding of human - animal co-sleeping has significant implications for human sleep, human - animal relations, and animal welfare.»

Rami Tzabar said the program «was inspired by a chance meeting with one of the contributors, the MIT linguist Shigeru Miyagawa, who talked about using animal behavior as a way of understanding the evolution of human language.

Rami Tzabar and Angela Saini of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) won the Gold Award for radio reporting by exploring how animal models of vocal communication may be useful in understanding how human language might have evolved.

He says it's also important to understand the protein's biological role in cellular signaling and normal animal development as well as to consolidate its role in human cancer development, progression and drug - resistance.

Dr Perry said: «Our results should provide new avenues for understanding the neural basis of cognition in all animals, including humans.»

«Neither am I suggesting that animal research is irrelevant to understanding human conscious feelings of fear.

«The idea is basically to understand how humans or animals make long - term decisions,» says Jan Balaguer, a PhD student at University of Oxford and member of Google DeepMind.

«Understanding the evolution of malaria parasites in bats and other animals, and how they fit into the tree of life, is key to understanding this important human diUnderstanding the evolution of malaria parasites in bats and other animals, and how they fit into the tree of life, is key to understanding this important human diunderstanding this important human disease.»

But when placed in a closed environment, Komodo dragons interact with their surroundings much in the same way humans do — at least on the microbial level — and researchers are using this knowledge to help them understand the health of animals in captivity.