Not exact matches
So all you can legitimately claim is that based on your imperfect partial
understanding of some the world's
religions none
of those
particular religions seemed to be true.
In fact
religion is commonly
understood as consisting precisely (from our viewpoint) in such relatively trivial and non-essential elements — as for example, the precise acceptance
of particular historic doctrines, the reverencing
of sacred books, or the performance
of specific ritual acts.
erience that ONLY my friends who are not attached to a
particular tradition, and
understand the phrase «
religion in the abstract,» will usually have read more than one
of those book, taken more than one seriously, or shown any intellectual honesty or maturity about the subject at all...
I feel this piece is insulting, and shows very little
understanding of what people who don't ascribe to a
particular religion really «feel» (since this seems to be a bad word with this guy).
It's my experience that ONLY my friends who are not attached to a
particular tradition, and
understand the phrase «
religion in the abstract,» will usually have read more than one
of those book, taken more than one seriously, or shown any intellectual honesty or maturity about the subject at all...
By these methods it is possible to
understand the rules and regulations
of religion and to discover their proper application in
particular instances.
It is a time when new leaders emerge who articulate a set
of commonly shared beliefs and
understandings — a new worldview — which the vast majority
of the population accept because it makes sense in terms
of their own experience, regardless
of their
particular denomination or
religion or formal belief or affiliation.
We may end up with some generalizations, but we should move from the
particular to the general, not from ideas about
religion in general to the
understanding of and response to
particular traditions.
I hope that this brief summary
of Islamic economics, and in
particular Ibn - Khaldun, will help to promote the idea
of interfaith dialogue,
of mutual respect and
understanding for other
religions.
A
religion is thus
understood as the
particular expression
of a universal mode
of human reaction to Ultimate Reality.
Furthermore, it must be kept in mind that the historian
of religions is engaged in the religio - scientific inquiry
of religions for the sake
of «
understanding,» and not for the service
of the propagation
of any
particular faith.