The key claims are these: first, actuality in a process metaphysics is not the paradigm case of reality, and, second, a full
understanding of actuality requires reference to potentiality.
Is this doctrine grounded in a religious apprehension of the togetherness of the universe, leading to
an understanding of actuality as complete togetherness — «togetherness of otherwise isolated eternal objects, and togetherness of all actual occasions» (SMW 251)?
Not exact matches
humberto - you do
understand that accepting the concept
of a god is contradictory to any belief or
actuality of «free will».
Insofar as «form,» thus
understood as a real ground, brings a natural entity, or more exactly, its «matter,» to its requisite definiteness, it must be regarded as the ground
of the
actuality of the entity.
Hence, if we wish to
understand the meaning
of manhood we must look to the movement from potentiality to
actuality; we must seek to
understand something
of what psychologists would call «the dynamics
of personality».
Whitehead insisted that «this final phase
of passage in God's nature is ever enlarging itself» (PR 530 — italics mine), that it is «an unresting advance beyond itself» (PR 531 — italics mine), that «the
actuality of God must also be
understood as a multiplicity
of actual components in process
of creation (PR 531 — italics mine) and that «in every respect God and the World move conversely to each other in respect to their process» (PR 529 — italics mine).
Now, in what sense is an occasion's universe —
understood as a community
of settled, or completed,
actualities — immanent in the occasion itself?
We agree that the distinction
of actuality and potentiality is crucial for
understanding the extensive continuum in its relation to past, present, and future.
My view
of the possibility
of regional inclusion
of standpoints rests on the
understanding that this potentiality for division precedes the
actuality of division by actual entities.
Thus the
actuality of God must also be
understood as a multiplicity
of actual components in process
of creation» (PR 531; italics added).
Then it is no longer enough to say that Jesus Christ is the interpretative key for our
understanding of the totality
of experience; our
understanding of worldly
actualities also enriches and completes our grasp
of who he is.
As his mind turned increasingly to philosophy, the physicist in him sought to
understand the whole
of reality and not only man, whilst the aesthete in him interpreted all reality by extrapolation from human experience, thus finding aesthetic value in all
actuality.
They recovered the classical experience
of reason as the potential infinity
of human questions, showing how this dynamic «ratio» as a desire for
understanding is healed and transformed by the paschal - metanoetic experience
of faith in the Sophia - Cod
of compassion and love.4 Aquinas, for example,
understood God as «intimately present within everything that exists since God is existence» and that Cod's omnipotence — Aquinas wrote very little about it — regards not
actualities but possibilities, and is best manifested in forgiveness and compassionate mercy.5
The «relatin rationis»
of God to all created events in the universe is another way
of stating this noncoercive Divine Presence or Mystery grounding all cosmic and human
actualities, beckoning human freedom towards noncoercive world and self
understanding and acting.
Neither man, however, had what Plato, also enthusiastic about mathematics, did have, a sagacious
understanding of the difference between mathematical concepts and concrete
actualities.
This deficiency, as it must seem to us, was in
actuality related to Israel's major attainment in the
understanding of personality.
How can this universal
actuality of sin against God in whose image we are created be
understood?
But if the Trinity be
understood in a purely economic sense, so that the distinctions correspond only to aspects
of God manifested in His activities
of creation, revelation, inspiration or the like, then there are no eternal relations
of self - giving within the divine life
of Absolute
Actuality.
Even if my speculations are fully warranted by Whitehead's
understanding of the extensive continuum, it should be clearly
understood that these considerations argue only for the possibility
of life after death, not at all for its
actuality.
In the recognition, that contemplation and reflection are the distance
of eternity away from time and
actuality, there is indeed a truth: the knower can
understand that truth, but he can not
understand himself.
- He... is
understood to be continually in process
of self - creation, synthesizing in each new moment
of his experience the whole
of achieved
actuality with the plenitude
of possibility as yet unrealized.
Here we can best
understand Whitehead's point by analogy with works
of the imagination, since this fourth way calls upon the resources
of conceptual possibility to heal the wounds inflicted by
actuality.
Unless Griffin demonstrates that we are not justified in not broadening our «
understanding of experience,» he has not demonstrated what he needs to demonstrate: that others can not justifiably reject his argument — can not justifiably reject his basis for maintaining that no
actuality can be totally devoid
of power
of self - determination.
We are instead inclined to suppose that
actuality,
understood under the category
of becoming, is not only the momentary becoming
of what is completely determinate, but that it is, moreover, shot through with a multiplicity
of indeterminate possibilities.
Faith, then, can be
understood as a total valuational response to the qualitative structure
of another
actuality prior to any clear specification about what is in fact good or bad, trustworthy or untrustworthy about the other
actuality.
The nineteenth century saw the reality
of the «historical facts» as consisting largely in names, places, dates, occurrences, sequences, causes, effects — things which fall far short
of being the
actuality of history, if one
understands by history the distinctively human, creative, unique, purposeful, which distinguishes man from nature.
Hence, the insoluble problem
of all dualisms,
understanding how two totally different kinds
of actualities can causally interact, is avoided.
If so, perhaps our only way
of understanding it is through the language and vision
of Buddhism, for only here may we encounter a coincidentia oppositorum which is manifest at the center
of actuality.
We can still speak
of interpretation because, on the one hand, the mystery contained in the book is made explicit in out experience and its
actuality is confirmed here, and because, on the other hand, we
understand ourselves in the mirror
of the word.
When Hartshorne speaks, then,
of metaphysical factors common to all possibilities, we
understand him to be referring chiefly to factors any conceivable
actuality (more accurately, any concrete singular or particular) will exhibit, not to factors which characterize possibilities or abstractions as such.
Perception in the mode
of causal efficacy
understood as the interrelatedness
of the universe as it impinges upon the individual without the specificity and clarity
of presentational immediacy could yield an experience
of an unqualifiable unity at the base
of all existence as one perceived the
actuality of concrescence.
The middle concept sees the divine
actuality primarily in terms
of God's becoming, although
understood nontemporally.
At that time
actuality was
understood purely in terms
of the concrete determinateness which an occasion had achieved, not in terms
of its concrescence.
23 The kingdom
of heaven, as Whitehead
understands it, is the perfected
actuality of God as incorporating within himself the ongoing process
of the world.
Perhaps, it is best
understood as that pneumopathology, that infection
of the spirit, that inhibits and interrupts and acts on the transition
of the modes
of being from potentiality to
actuality revealed in the mode
of «time and temporal existence.»
As Felt points out, the problem is to show how epistemological and ontological aspects
of particular
actualities can be
understood together.
But its positive strength is (1) to provide an
understanding of God's identity as an individual through abstractions alone («This does not imply that God is a merely abstract entity, but only that what makes God God and no other individual is abstract «15), and (2) more specifically, to identify God as the sole individual with strictly universal functions, defined with relation to
actuality as such and with respect to possibility as such.
«If we
understand the exhibition as a form
of communication, it does not simply comment on
actualities in our society such as widespread discrimination, bias or deliberate misinformation, but rather it presents a complex view
of the real, with no one dominant view, a reality formed by a vibrant and brilliant multitude
of perspectives» said Delahunty.
He (along with a few
of his other Cubist colleagues) also played with trompe l'oeil, but he
understood this wasn't the same thing — a device rather than an
actuality or contending force.
To think about the
actuality and future
of photography means to
understand it as a subjunctive, in which within the framework
of the exhibition and publication various artistic practices are discussed.
I received interesting comments from AGW proponents and sceptics alike which showed an astonishing range
of differing interpretations and
understandings of the greenhouse effect none
of which bore much relation to the
actuality.
There are many interesting comments from proponents
of human caused climate change (AGW or anthropogenic global warming) and from sceptics which show an astonishing range
of differing interpretations and
understandings of the so called Greenhouse Effect none
of which bear much relation to the
actuality.
From my experience watching the climate science issue advance over the years, what I continually see is people, like yourself who have clear expertise in a specific area, believing that they
understand the entire breadth
of the climate change issue when, in
actuality, they
understand very little
of the other broader elements
of the global climate system that come into play.
In other words, no recruiter would want to hire an individual who does not labor enough to
understand the
actualities of a problem / issue.