But I worry that the question of pets in heaven could distort
our understanding of eternal life as described in Scripture and Christian tradition.
The bodily resurrection of Christ is basic to Paul's
understanding of eternal life, but this very concrete faith that gives rise to his hope that we will join Christ in a resurrection like his becomes less and less comprehensible the more one reflects on the eternity it promises.
«as far as views of the world and existence, i would much rather «put all my eggs» in the basket of my understanding» = > I thought you had
no understanding of eternal life?
By harvest he means
the understanding of eternal life; the disciples mean a literal harvest and point out that it is still four months from harvest time.
Not exact matches
What part
of —
Eternal Life — you don't
understand?
However, I do
understand the concern
of the professor that the conversation extend beyond the person's family into the subject
of salvation and
eternal life.
Finally, read the commentary
of the Apostle John on the discussion between Jesus and Niccodemus, «For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should never perrish, but have
eternal life,» and then you will see and
understand what God's love looks like.
For the
life of me, I don't
understand this need to be
eternal children, calling on «daddy» for help whenever
life gets hard.
Then they will
understand that physical death is the beginning
of eternal life in paradise.
This is a simplification
of the complex Hindu
understanding of history as determined by the past
lives of others: that we are all stuck in an
eternal cycle
of suffering perpetuated by reincarnation.
By focusing on the inner dynamic
of God's
eternal life as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, Barth is able to avoid two errors: a static
understanding of eternity, and one completely divorced from all temporality.
Without a Triune God there would be no
understanding of people having one day, an
eternal life!
Craig that was exactly my
understanding however if we believe that in that traditional sense a person could lose there
eternal life by there actions by not walking in the Lord which i do nt think is right as
eternal life is a free gift from God not based on works.Jeremys definition is that we are saved by faith in Jesus Christ to
eternal life.I believe the term salvation has the meaning to be saved not necesarily to
eternal life but saved from ourselves Christ gives us the power to be transformed into his likeness or to be Christ like.In the
eternal picture our actions determine how we are rewarded from God although its not the motivation
of the reward but because we love the Lord.regards brent
First, the person may stop resisting, and submit to what the Holy Spirit is saying, and so, having
understood that they are a sinner and in need
of salvation because judgment is coming, they will believe in Jesus Christ for
eternal life.
My disagreements with the five points
of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or
understanding of Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition
of certain biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification,
eternal life, forgiveness
of sins, etc, etc..
I don't disagree (if I am
understanding you correctly), but we must make sure we
understand the difference between how to receive
eternal life (believe in Jesus Christ alone for it), and the logical and theological foundations for that truth (deity
of Jesus, death and resurrection
of Jesus, sinfulness
of humanity, etc., etc., etc.).
To the best
of my
understanding, the deposit
of faith clearly affirms the following: that God desires the salvation
of all and offers the real possibility
of salvation to all; the offer can be accepted or rejected and, if accepted by faith, such faith is recognized as the gift
of God; if the offer is knowingly, freely, and definitively rejected, even at the very last moment
of life, one goes to hell, which is
eternal; but the deposit
of faith does not tell us clearly that anyone is in fact eternally damned.
If we can
understand how Jewish people were saved prior to the death and resurrection
of Jesus, then we can begin to answer how other people around the world may be able to receive
eternal life before they have heard about Jesus.
When our conclusions regarding regarding troubling passages in the NT contradict the clear, positive statements out
of the mouth
of Jesus in John 3:16, 18, 5:24, and elsewhere, regarding
eternal life being a simple matter
of faith we need to keep seeking until our
understanding of those passages agrees with that He said.
But when we
understand that the gospel contains both truths, about how to receive
eternal life and properly
live this
life, then we can stop arguing about the role
of faith and works in the gospel and see that both have their proper place with proper results.
Essentially, when it comes to the role
of faith and works, it is critical to
understand the important distinction between the free gift
of eternal life to all who simply believe, and many
of the other benefits
of the Christian
life which can be gained through following Jesus daily.
A deep
understanding of the reality
of eternal life should shape our character now to be as courageous — albeit imperfect and conflicted — as Bonhoeffer himself.
Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no
eternal consequence upon them they
live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws
of God even even when we do nt know or
understand his laws.brentnz
This would then have nothing to do with whether or not the unregenerate person could
understand the offer
of eternal life through faith in Jesus Christ, and believe in Him as a result.
One
of the central ramifications to the Calvinistic
understanding of Total Depravity as total inability is the idea that people are not even able to believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
The way
of the master is an evangilism method in which an individual takes a few questions and asks them to another individual who is trying to get a realistic
understanding of who God is and how Jesus Christ offers us the gift
of salvation and
eternal life.
The connection
of Christ's resurrection with our hope
of eternal life is
understood when we see that it is Jesus, the man who gave his
life trusting the divine love, whom we know as the risen and present Christ.
But Christianly
understood death is by no means the last thing
of all, hence it is only a little event within that which is all, an
eternal life; and Christianly
understood there is in death infinitely much more hope than merely humanly speaking there is when there not only is
life but this
life exhibits the fullest health and vigor.
The ultimate reality upon which our hope depends is therefore the
eternal truth and power
of God, breaking into the flow
of historical events, qualifying it, transforming it, yet always to be
understood as giving meaning to
life through its relation to that which is beyond the time form
of the world process.
Of course, who would believe in Jesus for
eternal life without
understanding that Jesus is God?
You need to
understand the fact that the fear
of having committed the unpardonable sin is the manifestation
of your concern about your salvation, about your
eternal security, about
eternal life.
There are many who believe they have
eternal life, but may not in fact have this free gift
of God, because they do not
understand what how God gives
eternal life to us.
I do not believe that to receive
eternal life, one must grasp and
understand the divinity
of Jesus.
These sorts
of examples are found all over the place in the Bible, and the consistent message and expectation
of biblical authors is that anyone and everyone can hear and
understand the Gospel, and having heard, believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
For example Frank constantly emphasizes the
eternal purpose to the extent that anyone who does nt grasp and
understand it as he does has missed the whole point
of the bible and body
life.
They argue that pistis / pisteuo should be
understood in the context
of the client - patron relationship
of the 1st century, turning God into a patron who'll rip
eternal life from your hands if you stop believing.
For the Christians, the point
of human
life is not to
understand what is
eternal or to learn how to die or to free oneself from concern for personal being.
Yet
of two things the Christian can be confident: that the way
of brotherhood and mutual
understanding is God's way, which if followed leads to justice, security, and peace; and that if man does end his collective
life upon earth, God will still reign in his
eternal Kingdom.
But if the Trinity be
understood in a purely economic sense, so that the distinctions correspond only to aspects
of God manifested in His activities
of creation, revelation, inspiration or the like, then there are no
eternal relations
of self - giving within the divine
life of Absolute Actuality.
Most Calvinists
understand the word to be in the passive voice, and translate it as such so it appears that people who believe in Acts 13:48 are totally passive in their reception
of eternal life: They were ordained by God to believe, and so they did believe.
As such, it is critical to properly
understand issues related to
eternal life, assurance
of salvation, the role
of faith and good works, and all related issues.
The third scenario would seem to be where the two tendencies continue, each on its own path, in a dynamic but notnecessarily destructive tension, with secular rationalists seeking to discredit the motives and actions
of the Church leadership in the post-Vatican II era, while those who affirm a hermeneutic
of continuity urge that the Good News be
understood as primarily concerned with
eternal life rather than secular interests.
Anyone with a little bit
of sense
understands that in the context
of Matthew 27:42, the word «save» does not mean escape from hell and entrance into heaven, or receiving
eternal life.
For to doubt
eternal life is to dismiss the promises
of God, to be dis - obedient to the Word
of God, to put our trust in our own
understanding and senses.
Thee good soil represents someone who; * admits and
understands that they are indebted to God because
of their sinful nature * that sin equals
eternal damnation hellfire * they turn to Jesus as our own saviour to abide in his covenant to fully repent
of sins and become holy enduring right to the end * remember Jesus said you can not serve the world and God, or money and god you can not be a master to both * the path to
eternal life is very narrow and strait and only few are able to find it you have to let go
of your desires and dictates
of the flesh and always embrace and find happiness serving god set your eyes on Jesus... crucify your desires..
If one believes all the right things, and can sign on the dotted line
of the best doctrinal statements that the church has ever written, but their
life is full
of hatred, greed, and selfishness, I would argue that while they may have
eternal life, and while they may believe some good truths from the gospel, they really have not
understood the most essential parts
of the gospel.
First
of all, it should be pointed out that an inability to hear and
understand the message
of Jesus is not necessarily the same thing as an inability to believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
If Christianity continues to tell you that WHEN you get your act together — God will finally open his arms, the representatives
of this faith are not
understanding the premier principal
of God — through Christ he loves you NOW — but when his love begins to radiate into your personal
life - your very personal
life - you will make choices reflecting that reality — all other things, people, dogmas, Biblical interpretations — all
of that through the long centuries
of man — will be a drop in His
eternal ocean and in that first
eternal moment — won't matter - your needs now matter — Christ addresses need — with Himself — demands — with parabolic events — and refusal — with the end result
of free will — even the will to reject Him — when He would have done anything for you to not be rejected.
Yet it remains the fact that there is a movement forward, and the Christian declaration is that in this, the hand
of God is to be discerned as He leads His children to a deeper
understanding of His nature and
of His purpose for them, thereby enriching their
lives and giving them the assurance that if they seek Him they will find
life eternal.
Once we come to
understand that the salvation word family almost never (if ever) explicitly refers to
eternal life but instead refers to some sort
of deliverance from the calamities
of life such as danger, suffering, sickness, and premature death, or to some sort
of negative experience at the Judgment Seat
of Christ, we can readily teach along with Scripture that salvation is conditional upon what we believe and how we behave.