This understanding of practical theology arose on the American scene out of liberation theologies.
Not exact matches
What
practical theology must provide is an
understanding of how faith can guide action in contemporary circumstances.
The current interest in
practical theology may be seen as a return to the earlier effort to develop a comprehensive, integrated
understanding of the life
of faith in contemporary society.
Lovin enters into the ongoing discussion
of what theological education should be and how «
practical theology» is to be
understood and included.
Theology understood as a
practical discipline should not» be confused with those
theologies that make the question
of «faith» the starting point
of theological reflection.
I
understand theology to be a
practical discipline — not in the sense that
theology is concerned to provide solutions to particular problems, but in the sense that the grammar
of Christian discourse takes its cue from the ways in which lives are formed.
I have argued that
practical theology can and should be the center
of theological studies (both in the seminary and the university) and that this
practical theology needs a clear
understanding of the nature
of practical moral thinking (
practical reason).
(This version
of First and Second Goods and their respective modes
of fulfillment is adumbrated in the moral
theology of Alfonsus Liguori and the
practical philosophy
of Bernard Lonergan, each
of whom
understood himself as part
of the natural law tradition.)
While I recall reading about the post-Schleiermacher tendency to
understand practical theology as made up
of numerous dimensions — the liturgical, moral, pastoral, spiritual, ecclesial and catechetical — within a clerical paradigm, I experienced it as a number
of nonintegrated, specific disciplines
of ministerial studies separated from other isolated disciplines dispersed throughout a confused theological curriculum.
No doubt it failed finally for the same reason it lasted as long as it did, because it was a
theology, gigantic and rigid and intricate, taking authority from its disciplines and its hierarchies even while they rendered it fantastically ill suited to the
practical business
of understanding and managing an economy.