Sentences with phrase «understanding of their natural cycles»

For effective management of these species, a solid scientific understanding of their natural cycles and the processes that influence those cycles is necessary.

All due to a better understanding of the natural cycles of the Earth.

Not exact matches

Catholic schools have a wonderful opportunity to invite trained NFP instructors to teach this part of the programme which will enable girls to gain a fuller understanding of their bodies and their fertility, while at the same time assisting young men better to understand and appreciate the miracle of fertility, the special role played by the woman, and the implications for her physically, psychologically and spiritually as the natural cycle plays out in her daily life.

In order to understand Earth's recent temperature record, it's essential to understand the impacts from these natural cycles, says Byron Steinman, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Minnesota's Large Lakes Observatory in Duluth and lead author of the new study.

«This finding is a major advance in understanding the natural carbon cycle, gained by applying a new understanding about how the «overturning circulation» of the Southern Ocean works,» said lead author Dr Andrew J Watson from the University of Exeter.

The $ 465 million OCO - 2 mission is designed to help scientists better understand Earth's carbon cycle, identifying natural and manmade sources and sinks of CO2 with great precision.

«Physicians have come to understand that, in many respects, suppressing the ovarian cycle with birth control pills is more natural than having 500 ovulations in a lifetime,» said Dr. Steven Goldstein, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City.

I understand this allows time for natural testosterone production to have time to return to normal after cycle in the case of any suppression after.

You're body is used to all these endogenous artificial testosterone, you know, your testosterone to estrogen ratio is getting messed up and so you do have to use what's called post cycle therapy when you're on pro-hormones and we won't get into the post cycle therapy as much on this podcast «cause I know we're kinda pushing for time but the problem is that if you don't cycle pro hormones, it can be tough on your liver, it can be tough on your own endogenous production so it's something that you do wan na make sure that you do, that you understand how to cycle properly and I have to be careful of course, giving out recommendations like that on this show just because so many people who are listening to this are competing in event like triathlons and marathons and thing of that nature where they're gonna be drug tested and stuff like this would be a big no - no anyways, you know, or they're going after more natural means and let's face it, prohormones can be kinda damaging to your body and the reason for that is because a lot of these side effects: acne and hair loss, breast tissue enlargement, or you know, what we affectionately call bitch tits in dudes, prostate swelling, you know, a lot of these hormonal imbalances that get created from dumping exogenous sources of hormones into your body and creating like a hormone milieu that can be a real real issue from a health standpoint.

It's also important to demystify the process so that students will understand how their initial uncertainty is a natural part of the learning cycle.

«Understanding this web of life and natural cycles allows children to identify their place in the world.

Ranging from sculpture that inhabits physical space in unusual ways in order to better understand and demonstrate force, motion, energy and matter, to works depicting the patterns of the earth and its cycles of change, the artists in this exhibit explore natural phenomena in ways both literal and conceptual.

Dust and Water are vital natural phenomena, which can be understood as ecological orders describing the cycle of creation and extinction.

A more reasonable natural variability / forcing argument might go something like this: 1) There is natural variability of climate due to solar activity 2) Climate is changing now 3) Forcing can result in climate change, but the response of the C cycle to forcing is poorly understood 4) Forcing is happening now 5) Forcing and / or solar activity could be to blame for current warming trends Is this unreasonable?

The implications of our findings are that the modern observations of ocean - driven warming along the western Antarctic Peninsula need to be considered as part of a natural centennial timescale cycle of climate variability, and that in order to understand climate change along the Antarctic Peninsula, we need to understand the broader climate connections with the rest of the planet.

You can read further details in any O level geology textbook should you wish to increase your knowledge of these natural processes, so basic to our understanding of the carbon cycle.

To understand the true significance of this temperature change, we must distinguish between natural weather cycles (such as the changing seasons), transitory climate variations (such as a temporary drought), and long - term climatic change.The earth's climate varies naturally for many reasons.

The temperature trend since 1998 is understood to result from natural climate variability, combined with reduced solar irradiance during the downward part of the solar cycle after its 2001 maximum.

Jack Greer says: February 3, 2011 at 5:43 pm quote The current scientific understanding of Earth's carbon cycles that, at this time, natural carbon emission sources weighed against natural carbon sinks should result in a net reduction in atmospheric CO2 levels.

The current scientific understanding of Earth's carbon cycles that, at this time, natural carbon emission sources weighed against natural carbon sinks should result in a net reduction in atmospheric CO2 levels.

And those who argue «it's just a natural cycle» can never seem to identify exactly which natural cycle can explain the current warming, nor can they explain how our understanding of the fundamental climate physics is wrong.

Natural cycles do have causes and we are far from understanding all of them and their effects.

You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand that there are natural cycles and that they milk them to scare us so they can tax and control us and get us to pay subsidies and allow tax credits so they, and their contributors can get rich off of windmills, solar panels, ethanol and whatever schemes they have to save the world from a made up problem that does not exist.

Beyond realizing the scientific objectives identified above, a natural outcome of this work will be to build a community of marine scientists who understand the processes regulating trace element cycles sufficiently well to exploit this knowledge reliably in future interdisciplinary studies.

Understanding the interactions of the atmosphere with the land and ocean is key to understanding the natural cycles of atmospheric gases and requires going beyond the earUnderstanding the interactions of the atmosphere with the land and ocean is key to understanding the natural cycles of atmospheric gases and requires going beyond the earunderstanding the natural cycles of atmospheric gases and requires going beyond the earth's surface.

our models for instance don't seem to even attempt to explain and illustrate by recreating many of the natural flucuations of the last say, 9000 years — they lack understanding of many of the known cyclics and how they and the less - understood undiscovered cycles effect and interact.)

And, finally, it will tend to validate your hypothesis that our planet's temperature moves in 30 - year warming / cooling cycles on a slightly tilted axis, as a result primarily of natural forcing factors and variability, the mechanisms for which we still do not fully understand today.

To understand why «this current» global warming is human caused and not natural cycle, one needs to get an idea of what the natural cycle is and what are the basic mechanisms that cause climate change in the natural cycle.

Until we understand the natural cycle of the roller coaster, and what controls it, we can not tell anything about the wind, let alone if air pressure affects it.

When you do not understand how to design systems that reinsert us into natural cycles by designing like nature does, you are stuck with assumptions about what «modern» responses are and only within «modern» types of actions.

Even Prof Jones admitted that he and his colleagues did not understand the impact of «natural variability» — factors such as long - term ocean temperature cycles and changes in the output of the sun.

The IPCC's attribution of «very likely» of man's contribution to recent warming is unsupported, and made only after ignoring what wasn't understood about natural cycles.