Sentences with phrase «understanding these points much»

The book itself is loaded with examples which make understanding these points much easier.

Not exact matches

By having an expert on your team, you'll know your customers and understand their language and pain points, which will make you a much more empathetic, trustworthy and credible partner.

I understand this to a point, but now I seriously don't want to give them any more work, not because of the quality of their work, but because they are simply too needy and it takes up too much of my time and energy to manage them.

As the hon. member before me pointed out, much of the world has lauded that, understands that and has given Canada credit for it.

Work with Investors and Raise Capital They are also able to always clearly answer the key questions: ▪ How much capital the need to raise ▪ What does success look like in 12 months ▪ Who is on the team and why ▪ Use of funds ▪ Who is in charge ▪ The go - to - market strategy ▪ How to recruit talent So for those who still feel compelled to build startups, a good starting point is to understand what it takes, and what the expectations are.

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

I believe god is love, I think we have little ability to understand much beyond that at this point and those who would define and codify god are arrogant fools doing harm in this world, I believe that the absence of love in anything is proof that it doesn't come from god, fire and brimstone does not come from god, unconditional love and acceptance does.

Science writers Carl Sagan and Fritjof Capra have pointed out similarities between the latest scientific understanding of the age of the universe, and the Hindu concept of a «day and night of Brahma», which is much closer to the current known age of the universe than other creation myths.

I understand and agree with many of their points, but the behavior is much like PETA.

I also understand that those who don't share your point of view (like JT and LouAZ) feel it necessary to discredit your thought by calling you names and acting like 2nd graders themselves; but, you should expect as much from commentors like that.

As much as christians spew on about how the mormons are not real christians, they fail to understand that the Book of Mormon still takes on its roots from the same bible they foolishly believe in... nothing like hypocrites to enlighten the mind and prove our point further.

Your point would be much better respect and understood if you just focused more time on humanitarian efforts rather than being anti-Christian.

You are making it needlessly hard, or are perhaps just plain too stupid to understand such a simple fact as: there's no point debunking myths that virtually no one and no one at all with any real clout believes in anyway, but MUCH point in debunking myths that large numbers of people, including powerful politicians, believe should be the guiding principles for the country's entire political culture and laws.

My disagreements with the five points of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or understanding of Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition of certain biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, etc, etc..

The whole point of these lessons we're supposed to learn is the idea that one day we become fathers, that we will grow up and have the same knowledge and experience of our fathers, sometimes more than but in terms of our relationship with god, we're supposed to accept that we're eternally children, that as much as we learn, grow and generally build upon past knowledge, we'll never attain the level of understanding or power that god has, this being is on a completely different level.

If you can't understand my explanation above and see that as an attempt at discrediting, without pointing out where exactly it's wrong, then there isn't much more I can do, other than hope one day you'll learn something.

Yet much can be done in the way of making clear the understanding of man's spiritual nature, his high destiny which points beyond this life for its fulfillment, the meaning of the Kingdom for this life and the next, the Christian concepts of judgment and salvation with eternity in their span — in short, the goodness and power of a God who, having given us this life, can give us another in which to attain to his nearer presence, enjoy a richer happiness, and do his will more perfectly.

In response, the proponents of «happiness» as the goal of life could point out that this term can be understood in much richer ways.

well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?

The Hebrew understanding of the covenant with God showed its distinctiveness much more clearly at the point of the divine initiative.

I regret is that I didn't realize what was happening to me sooner and do the research sooner to understand my experiences (at one point I thought that I needed an exorcism) as these adverse experiences led me down a path that has created much delusion, confusion, instability and loss of control of my life.

My point in the article is that we can only truly love ourselves when we first come to understand how much God loves us.

I believe that the contemporary student generation's concern for freedom in higher education and their recognition of the slavishness of much of what goes by the name of liberal studies points toward the need to restore the lost element of leisure in the life of learning and to renew the conviction that understanding contains its own rewards.

By the same token, we've got to understand that we can be much more effective in getting our point across and realizing our goals if that prophetic language comes with a degree of understanding and respect.

You said «My point is that your tiny sliver of Existance, much less your limtied understanding of our physical world and all the laws of physics is hardly enough to refute the Existance of its Creator.»

My point is that your tiny sliver of Existance, much less your limtied understanding of our physical world and all the laws of physics is hardly enough to refute the Existance of its Creator.

At this point, I'm inclined to think that the inconsistency is due to you not really understanding what it is that you believe (an inevitability, I suppose, when you try not to think about it too much).

(That Jesus declared all foods clean — Mark 7:19 — is not so clear, particularly when one considers that the Jerusalem church apparently never understood this to be the case and that Peter only got the point much later.

Both of them are now believers, which is their choice as adults, but they fully understand my position on religions and we sometimes have some wonderful discussions on the subject, but I usually just get them confused because I know so much more about the Christian faith than they do because I have studied it from a secular point of view.

If you really don't understand that we have multiple theories of gravity and that they all have flaws, then you've pretty much just proven my point that you have no idea what you're talking about.

And he needed no less, Gleick might have added, what three centuries ago Giambattista Vico was calling fantasia, that faculty of imaginative understanding so conspicuously lacking in the Enlightenment absolutists who, as Isaiah Berlin has pointed out, did so much to create the rift between the sciences and the humanities.

It is in this way that I should wish to understand the point of that eschatological motif which is so much a part of the biblical picture.

We have a much greater understanding of addiction today than we did back then but as you've pointed out in numerous postings, the church really doesn't know how to cope when addictive cycles in Christian contexts.

Granted that from the point of view of understanding the faith of ancient Israel these are not critical questions, we of typically Western frame of mind, who put so much significance upon delineation of fact, can not but regret this kind of frustration.

At key points in the book, Wright shows that much of the way people understand the world stems from the presuppositions of modern and postmodern worldviews.

I understand your point around the egg whites, just be careful as cooking egg whites at elevated temperatures (required for frying, roasting, and baking) for extended or multiple periods of time can cause it to turn rubbery; and from what I understand half the point of folding them whipped into the mixture wasn't just for binding but also to make the texture more light and airy, thus my point about avoiding as much extra exposure to heat after they have «firmed» up.

At this point, I do not understand keeping Fultz out much longer.

If I was undecided before now, now I am certain Wenger's been right all with his approach of not signing prima donnas who think that they are bigger than the team, it's refreshing to see a player with as much enthusiasm as Sanchez but at some point discretion and good sense has to prevail, afterall he and Ozil are Barca and Madrid rejects, I would take RvP and Fabregas over him and Ozil, players we didn't have to pay over the odds for, players who despite the circumstances of their exits understood the team comes first.

I understand your point, however, had AP's horrendous contract ended one year earlier the Franchise Tag would be a much, much, much smaller number.

Was not analyzing the Manchester ss and don't really care much there but from a footballing point of view and from the words of MR wenger I understand the logic I do nt read what the media thinks neither My comment above addresses the issues we face in comparison to the two previous seasons adding in our re enforcements The 22 million question «Are the Arsenal capable of achieving 85 point come next May???» I believed we were strong last year and said it here that the team was strong and together and used the very words that MR wenger used cohesion but as the season unfolded the cracks showed up at the very beginning when we lost to west ham and it got worse as we lost pole position and every thing around us came tumbling down by February last season here comes another important question did they know and understand what happened do they know what to do this term to avoid the very same faith well we wait and see Irregardless of what happens I will support Arsenal and will keep analyzing every match my way until May so Good luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beating

My point is DT aterta used to play as DM and deep lying playmaker at d same time It was too much for him and some arsenal fans don't understand what Wenger does Now d work aterta did is now shared bw Coq and Caz Dt shift is what has given arsenal our consistency.

I agree with Rob that it would be harder for those unfamiliar with world soccer in general to understand how much a player of his talent can contribute to an overall game without relating him to an American sporting position (cliches like quarterback or point guard) which really don't do what he does justice.

Again, this is a team game, his head blown and he is about money now which can be understood at this point of his career going on 29 wich is pretty much 30 even if CR7 makes statistic lies, stilll; he is not 23 or 25.

The way I understand it, he didn't mean to say that Mayweather was «shot» per se, but that Pacquiao has regressed much more than Mayweather at this point.

That figure is the starting point in negotiations: teams will likely balk at the idea of giving Martinez that much money over the amount of years it will require, but they now understand that only the serious suitors have a real chance at signing Boras» client.

Ignore them as they are rubbish because instead of looking it from your point of view, trying to understand why of all people, you decide Denilson was a better fit in that team vs Liverpool, they go out and bash your article without so much of a thought with (Insert Name) is better than Denilson, or degrading comments.

Mourinho may have had a point in arguing that his replacement of Marcus Rashford with Anthony Martial was ultimately what won United that game, whether the crowd liked it or not, but what supporters found much harder to understand was his allegation that there was not enough love around the place for Romelu Lukaku.

He did not like this very much at first, but he was 3 years old at that point and could understand when we told him it was time he slept in his own bed.

If parents can delay gratification and open their minds to radical acceptance and understanding needs from the child's point of view, aka reflective function, the child will have the opportunity to learn as much self - regulation and self - agency as possible.