Sentences with phrase «understands if this relationship»

Not exact matches

My guess is that most CMOs and CEOs never thought they would be looking to teenagers for advice on their brand or how to create a relevant, dynamic and lasting relationship with their brand, but if that is your audience, then it certainly makes sense to understand how teenagers» brains work.

If you want to drive sales growth and repeat business, it boils down to understanding and then implementing one strategy: Content builds relationships, relationships build trust, and trust equals sales.

We believed that the relationship between natural capital, or what nature provides for free, and production could be understood only if the corporations and foundations that focused on development embraced the idea that nature and human well - being are inseparable.

If there's one thing software company Ebsta understands, it's customer relationship management.

A mature sales relationship is one where the client understands that you are a busy professional and that if they miss you and leave a message, you will get back to them as soon as possible.

If you are looking for an advisory - based relationship, the first thing to understand about your financial professional's credentials is whether he or she is a fiduciary — and whether he or she is a fiduciary all the time.

«If your boss doesn't like you, they'll likely keep it to themselves, as they understand the need to keep the relationship professional and to not play favorites in the office,» says Michael Kerr, an international business speaker and author of «The Humor Advantage.»

«If people begin to be turned off by Trump, the Cruz campaign will probably have a better strategic understanding of the implications and how to capitalize upon them,» said Bud Jackson, a Democratic specialist in digital grassroots campaigning, when asked to review the relationships.

But if we do not recognize the important relationship here, we fail to understand the full importance of what has been expelled when the demonic bondage of communism has ceased.

It is not as if matter has been invested with some divine quality in its own right — that would indeed be a magical understanding — rather it is the dynamic, Spirit filled presence of the Christ in an enfleshed relationship with his People that constitutes the principle of sacramental life - giving empowerment.

If you want to deepen your relationship with God and better understand Scripture, take one (or all) of these courses.

If, as Hauerwas has eloquently argued, Christians place their hope in the Kingdom of God, and seek to embody that Kingdom by living faithfully as church, then they need to have some understanding of the relationship of God's Kingdom to political power.

If you think these men a sheltered life and don't understand human relationships and fatherhood it is because you haven't bothered to understand their mission within the church.

We need not conceive such a reversal of consciousness as purely imaginative or visionary, as witness Marx's dialectical understanding of the integral and necessary relationship between consciousness and society, and Marx's revolutionary understanding of society was a consistent enlargement — if reversal — of Hegel's dialectical method.

-- if i am understanding you correctly the story of Cain and Abel is not factual and is only illustrative of relationships between men and between men and God (but only godwards?)

Your relationships will grow stronger and deeper if you mindfully practice loving understanding with your friends each day.

Please, if you have such a relationship, understand that many feel toward you THE SAME WAY you would feel if someone told you that had a deep, personal relationship with Julius Caesar.

Thus, the true manifestation of acceptance and understanding in the relationship of pastoral care is not some simple positivity, as if one felt two degrees better today and four degrees tomorrow.

This is especially so if one understands by the Single One not Kierkegaard's man, who finds truth by separating himself from the crowd, but Buber's man of the narrow ridge, who lives with others yet never gives up his personal responsibility nor allows his commitment to the group to stand in the way of his direct relationship to the Thou.

If we are praying to get some thing or some result for ourselves or others, then absolutely be prepared for disappointment, but when prayer is just an ongoing conversation with the compassionate, understanding deity bubbling out of a growing relationship with the said deity then you don't give a shit about the results because they are no longer the point.

(7) He sets the tone by paying attention to the contributions of others, perhaps of reflecting what they are saying with, «Let's see if I understand what you mean...» (8) He helps build group - centered (as contrasted with self - centered) contributions by his linking function in which he points to the relationships among various individuals» contributions to the discussion.

These consequences can be avoided if we revive the authentic Biblical understanding of the personal relationship between God and man.

If you want to know / understand how God wants us to be human and so with this thought, please listen to every bit of Jeremy Myers and move into relationship with Jesus Christ and your fellow citizens of the world meant for you / us.

If God is understood as independent, as the dominant Western worldview asserts, then death remains ultimately outside God's experience and God's relationship to death is an external one.

If we accept the message, if we focus our understanding of God and life around this message, if we live toward God and in right relationship with others with Jesus as our compass, then for us he is indeed the ChrisIf we accept the message, if we focus our understanding of God and life around this message, if we live toward God and in right relationship with others with Jesus as our compass, then for us he is indeed the Chrisif we focus our understanding of God and life around this message, if we live toward God and in right relationship with others with Jesus as our compass, then for us he is indeed the Chrisif we live toward God and in right relationship with others with Jesus as our compass, then for us he is indeed the Christ.

In this sense, the extent of our salvation can be increased by the death of Jesus if we understand salvation as our final relationship with God.

They argue that pistis / pisteuo should be understood in the context of the client - patron relationship of the 1st century, turning God into a patron who'll rip eternal life from your hands if you stop believing.

Even If I have a warm personal relationship with Jesus, I also need an account of what's so special about Jesus to understand why my relationship with him is so important.

Even if you don't believe in God, hopefully you understand that you can't abuse relationships with everyone and everything forever without reaping negative consequences.

If Ifelt unsure about someone I would try to build relationships, understand others we may feel indifferent about.

While I agree with respect to being close minded, I don't understand how people with diverse, if not irreconcilable, religious beliefs can hold a long term relationship together.

CNN: My Take: If you hear God speak audibly, you (usually) aren't crazy Tanya Marie («T.M.») Luhrmann, psychological anthropologist and the author of «When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God,» explains that hearing the voice of God isn't as unusual as many would believe.

It helps both pastor and couples if these realistic goals of the prewedding sessions are clearly understood by both: (1) Building or strengthening the minister - couple relationship is the most important single goal!

If she had, she'd understand the intimacy level involved is far more intense than many «vanilla» relationships.

And if people do not understand maybe it's because they do not have a relationship with Jesus Christ.

Just because Wars had been waged in the name of religion doesn't make the point of it Wrong,,, otherwise why does it say (He who loves me, keeps my commandments) almost at the same time as it says (I give you a new commandment, love...) in short, Yes, Jesus is what matters, but to know Jesus I need His word, the Bible, I need a relationship with Him, I need to understand What He wants me to be Like (Be Holy as your Father in Heaven) which is not just an old testament quote, but a new Testament as well,,, at the end, if Religion was so pointless and to be hated, why Would God ask us to test the spirits, why does he tell us (by their fruits you would know them.)

The answer to your set of what ifs is that having lost a biblical understanding of ritual and the importance of concrete acts and relationships, we become preoccupied with ideas, which is to say, we become gnostics — which is to say, we become what the (conservative Protestant) American church largely is today.

We must give an answer if we are to understand the relationship between the altar and the table.

This only happens occasionally in the book but prevents the reader sharing in the deeper revelation and love of God that is occurring at that point in salvation history, especially in light of the New Testament, and raises the question that if the person in Scripture who is experiencing this unique relationship with God didn't really understand God, then how can we?

When a late Isaiah represents God as saying, «I dwell... with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite,» (Isaiah 57:15) the question rises in the mind of one who understands from within what the implied experience means: If God so cares for persons one by one and so dwells in them with creative power, is it not impossible that the relationship will be summarily terminated at death?

If God is really actively engaged with and in the world, adapting the divine intention to it, taking into the divine life what occurs there, and hence seriously affected by it quite as much as sustaining it creatively and working within it to accomplish an enduring purpose, then indeed God must be understood in a fashion that is most suitably symbolized by what we know of relationship at the human level — granted, of course, that we say this with an O altitudo, to use Sir Thomas Browne's phrase.

Thus Cyril C. Richardson has criticized the classical formulations of the Trinity as imposing an arbitrary «threeness» upon our theological thinking, and proposes instead a basic twofold distinction between God as Absolute and God as Related.1 This is for Richardson a basic paradox, an apparent self - contradiction, for if we try to bring these aspects into relationship, we compromise God's absoluteness.2 Charles Hartshorne accepts this same twofold distinction, but he removes the contradictory element by understanding it in terms of the abstract and concrete dimensions of God's nature and experience.3

If we are ever to understand modern exegesis and critique it correctly, we simply must return and reflect anew on Luther's view of the relationship between the Old and New Testaments.

The Protestant emphasis on the need for a personal relationship with God, if not balanced by an emphasis on the need to belong to a community of others who are also rightly related to God, can lead to an excessively individualistic understanding of human society.

If you have not yet come into a relationship with the living G - d, you will never «get it» or understand.

We must understand that if Christians and non-Christians differ over marriage, that difference does not lie in their understanding of the quality of interpersonal relationship needed to enter or sustain a marriage, but rather in a disagreement about the nature of marriage and its place in the Christian and national community.

Now if Jethro, the Midianite - Kenite, never served in such a relationship to Moses, it is difficult to understand how and why tradition (in tendency always disposed to magnify the stature of Moses) would create an account giving so decisive a role not simply to another man, but to a non-Israelite.

(4) Participants can discover and practice styles of communication that reduce polarization and increase understanding — owning and expressing one's own needs rather than trying to convert the other, listening with understanding, etc. (5) If the group learns these bridge - building skills, it can break out of the win - lose struggle and achieve a degree of difference - respecting, collaborative intergroup relationships.

In my way of looking at things, how can we really understand relationship with God, loving God, if we do not love our neighbors?

He has met His standard or proof, if it doesn't meet yours and you think that is a sufficient defense, I don't think you fully understand your position in the relationship.